So it is 2 possible.

1. Badly, the global exchange connection burst at the same time they switch on Private IP for most 30M customers, so not Private IP fault.
2. After switch on the Private IP, the device that handle for Private IP burst for too much users to be handle, QoS setting misconfigured for multi user.
3. TM staff own account have higher QoS than normal customers.

Still thinking which one is it, sadly no Time on landed house, else who want to perform testing to find it out...

---
Quick copy paste from other thread.
For UniFi portal and self-test, it is their side problem, 500 lol...



Still finding...

This post has been edited by BenYeeHua: Dec 17 2021, 12:23 PM

My best guess is TM are earning money by asking more money for CDN traffic that hosting in Malaysia, they refused.
So they moved CDN back to SG, leaving Malaysia CDN to those content provider that willing to paid the traffic money, in case they want to provide good server to Malaysia users.

So, the ball kicked back to TM, and TM have to bare the cost for paying lot of traffic going to SG.
And us, as UniFi user, are paying to TM to pay those exchange for traffic to SG.

That's why we have expensive traffic cost compare to others, TM are not having cheap traffic for local MY CDN, so they ran to SG CDN.
In the end, TM have to pay for SG exchange, to provide service for MY user to use those services provider that hosted on SG CDN.

Just like Netflix on US, are asking by Comcast to pay the unbalance traffic from Comcast users and Netflix as content provider, they want double the money from both side, like Foodpanda or Grabfood, paid by customer and restaurant.


So you should ask, why TM not willing to sell cheap but reasonable local traffic to local CDN, find a balance point to reduce the cost, but willing to pay for expensive traffic to exchange with SG?
(as it is cheaper for you to pull the local cable to increase the bandwidth, instead of going to another exchange on SG, except they are lazy to pull the local cable la..)

No, packet drop start on TM local private range IP that hosted on SG, so TM are packet dropping now.

And no, IPv4 also the same packet drop...

This post has been edited by BenYeeHua: Dec 17 2021, 01:51 PM

So it is area depended?
Melaka, loading take like 1 mins with heavy packet drop, others thing are the same.

This post has been edited by BenYeeHua: Dec 17 2021, 02:34 PM

Hmm, so Sarawak are special now with their line routed back to here, maybe QoS priority are higher than normal UniFi user.

Anyways, most thing that hosted on SG are giving me a crappy experience for me now, because heavy packet drop.

No, it will force free upgrade for 30 days trial, and your plans will still be the same as now.

During Streamya era, before I talk to them about CCTV and Public IP switch, opening lowyat caused connection reset, guess port not enough or CloudFlare seen as DDOS user.
Then after switch back Public IP, all went back to normal, just like UniFi.

And now, UniFi are forcing Private IP, I hope this case don't show up anymore.
---
For that IP range, good and bad QoS, I can say it is true.

Someone that I know have a agreement on TM WiFi(yes, that one you can use at any TM WiFi AP), they will give you a private local account for you to use.
After they detect your usage are 100% 24 hours, the private company that sign the contract with you will change the QoS from Business QoS level back to Streamyx level quietly.

This is how TM let you feeling good outside as a potential customer(that using data, but found TM WiFi and trial for it), but feeling bad as Streamyx customer.


Also a very old time, 60.48.x.x is best to China mainland(80ms), HK(70ms) and TW(50ms).
But now, it is China mainland(300ms), HK(50ms) and TW(80ms).

This post has been edited by BenYeeHua: Dec 17 2021, 09:58 PM

Depend on location, mine home town at N.Sembilan, pulling around 2016 long time ago, then pull extension and extension then give everyone 30M max only, get fiberhome, and having unable to PPPoE issues sometimes, then fixed after maintenance.
Even through it is 30M only, at least it is Fiber, thunder here can be crazy and going through phone line copper, my computer's network card and phone burn like 3 times already, while the ADSL modem safe from it.

Here Melaka much older and all under Huawei Modem.

For router, wait, VDSL fiberhome router?
If yes, then great.

In a very rare case, nothing changed, but mine case are too high sensitive and modem keep disconnect the PPPoE session lol.
As long as it is fiber, I can ensure that the quality is much much much and much better than ADSL/VDSL.

Just look outside of my neighbor's fiber cable, it is dropped nearly to the ground(5 m from ground), still no complain from them.

This post has been edited by BenYeeHua: Dec 18 2021, 11:18 AM

Good to you, for that cctv setup, except you don't have @unifi at your old SSID, you can just copy paste the SSID and password to new modem.

Hope you already taken a photo on your PPPoE password as your own backup.

This post has been edited by BenYeeHua: Dec 18 2021, 06:53 PM

You are second one say about this since yesterday, can be Android hang socket bug.

Force stop Facebook, turn off then on your phone WiFi, open FB again, if normal, yes, Android old bug.

New bug like 1.5 month ago, after update it become like that, just, nah, forget about it, it is Google!

Did you know that...
One plus OxygenOS have too much bug and give up by Oppo?

Now it is replaced by ColorOS, OxygenOS is dead, so...

Some phone having bad antenna for high band 5Ghz, you can try check did your 5Ghz are channel 138, not channel 36 etc

Certain phone compatible with many channel and bandwidth(like 80mhz and 160mhz), but it don't means it is optimized for it, and facing speed drop and interference issues.

Can try these 2.

1. Saying you VPN back to your home for accessing local CCTV, no IPv6 available for your office because of security issues.
2. Purchase a cheap RM 30-50 CCTV that only allowing open port to access

Or, funny DIY but they don't understand.
3. Using a Android phone or linux virtual machine which using webcam as the CCTV, and open port for it to access.

Still, last time I asked CS when they switch me to Private IP, they don't allow me to switch back Public IP, guess it is only allowed for >100M plans users, even through 100M plan user are getting Private IP la.

Fun fact, anyone with a taman/apartment that limited you to 30M plan only, you might be upgraded to 30days trial of 100M already this month, if you speed test can reach 100M dl 50M up(with 5Ghz WiFi or lan cable), then you better maintain the plans before they downgrade you back to 30M.

This post has been edited by BenYeeHua: Dec 22 2021, 03:12 PM

Yes, unless they still reject your upgrade by seeing your speed test running as 100M.

Because your area is low budget area, so they limit you to 30M to ensure all of you would not break the total bandwidth that can carry on this fiber signal, as this signal are for whole bigger area that including expensive taman with 800M.

My old town taman outside 1 KM got 800M for 3 floor house, then they pull extension with only 30M for 1-2 floor house in this taman.

Unlike China, China is shared total bandwidth, like 10G for the whole signal on fiber, then they give a virtually 50G to most subs/users, as not most users are running on 100% bandwidth, only 20%, so it will still be 10G total bandwidth but dynamic usage, then they can pull more fiber to improve the speed future la.

This post has been edited by BenYeeHua: Dec 23 2021, 09:11 PM

Yes, but it means, for 100 people that rich on house looking, are getting 800M plan access, for 1k people that not looking rich, only access to 30M, kind of funny because most rich looking house are empty, they all gone to outside because my home town city are dying and reviving as by food city because got KTM upgraded.
So I am unsure total bandwidth for this area using for 50% or not.

Some cheap chipset like Realtek or old Qualcomm only can running 100M, running 1G and it might disconnect randomly per 12 hours by spinning fan wind, even with 1 meter long cable, unsolvable case...

Yes, just like you don't pay the bill and cut out after 24 hours, then after you paid for it, it will restore just within 10 mins, very quick one.
Up to 2 days just for in case they have system error, or the port is unstable, because lot of users just cut the line and leave the house, but the address still holding the line by their account, so TM don't know did your area really can running 300M good or not because of this troublesome users.

Can confirm, packet drop for SG CDN server too(they failed for downloading data from HK), have to connect JP CDN server to workaround it.
All HK line are overloading now, including tencent and baidu.

This post has been edited by BenYeeHua: Dec 25 2021, 03:25 PM

The problem is going back to HK, SG to HK also overloaded, so even you are connected to SG, if the data can't obtain from HK, then it is pretty much useless.
For example, Tencent from MY to China also break, they kick me offline at 1 PM, then switched on backup line already.

So far most HK link break, including hkix, which is rare...
A website using CDN at US also failed to going back China, interesting, should be related, I think.

But equinix are fine, just it is using for China Mobile only.

Hmm, I means, lot of provider going to China are having issues, but I can't verify la, people put the server behind CDN to hide where is their main server, so I can only guess he put it on HK or TW, because he is at mainland.

https://tieba.baidu.com/ should be good case for hkix, Bilibili also one, but you will connect to SG, unless you write HK IP to host.

Wait.

Don't tell me, it is another round packet drop for Melaka, JB users only again...

This post has been edited by BenYeeHua: Dec 25 2021, 04:09 PM

The problem is, how many website are using IPv6???

Wait, so only me is using HKIX going to HK???
So it is really explain why some TM users are having issues, but others are not.


---
And ya, after you said that, it is dropping on internal IP, so it can be TM side on HK dropping packet, before going into hkix...

Why you are talking like 98% website also using CloudFlare???

This post has been edited by BenYeeHua: Dec 25 2021, 04:32 PM