Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

10 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Top Glove Share Buybacks, Keep Tab!

views
     
andrekua2
post Dec 5 2020, 01:28 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
13,494 posts

Joined: Jan 2012


QUOTE(Boon3 @ Dec 5 2020, 01:15 PM)
Distribute wealth? Do you really believe all such rumours. Lol. That's the easy way out, isn't it?

How about if I say the boss is way to determined and relentless in trying to maintain his stock's market cap?

Why not? Company got profit windfall ma. He wants his stock market cap to challenge Maybank. Understandable. Sudden extreme richness brings extreme wishes....

So could this be why his aggressiveness in buying back the stock, trying to maintain  certain top price for his stock?

No matter what... right now... the way the company is buying back the stocks is not good for the shareholders. Current prices indicate a paper loss of close to 100 million. If the stock reaches a low of 6, losses will be over 200 million.

If one is the shareholder, one has the right to ask.. Wtf.

If you want to reward is, give us cash.

The way the company is conducting its buyback, the shareholders rewards dimishes!!
*
Personally I think the boss is preparing his move for next takeover. All those shares can be used to offset his next big purchase just in case if they are still interested to stay related with gloves. It would not reduce/dilute his shareholdings in TG.
TSBoon3
post Dec 5 2020, 01:53 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,942 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(immobile @ Dec 5 2020, 12:34 PM)
tq tq noted. like you have mentioned, TG been doing it quite aggressively. Tropicana bought into top glove share which means they are losing money atm

"Based on a back-of-the-envelope calculation, the property developer paid an average of RM6.97 per share for the lot." - from the Edge news
haha TG closed rm6.65 on friday
*
Quite clear Tropicana has the money but then it's not really that rich cos whatever money Tropicana has, it's limited cause tropicana own financial obligation is massive. Their QR shows they need to finance their massive loans which at the mement cost roughly some 30 million plus in interest per quarter. To buy more is sending Tropicana on a first class jet to Holland....
sjteh
post Dec 5 2020, 03:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: May 2010
QUOTE(Boon3 @ Dec 5 2020, 01:53 PM)
Quite clear Tropicana has the money but then it's not really that rich cos whatever money Tropicana has, it's limited cause tropicana own financial obligation is massive. Their QR shows they need to finance their massive loans which at the mement cost roughly some 30 million plus in interest per quarter. To buy more is sending Tropicana on a first class jet to Holland....
*
Maybe tan Sri persuaded trop directors to buy & promise TG stock will hoot to the moon & give dividend kaw2..
😂
TSBoon3
post Dec 5 2020, 05:27 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,942 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(sjteh @ Dec 5 2020, 03:54 PM)
Maybe tan Sri persuaded trop directors to buy & promise TG stock will hoot to the moon & give dividend kaw2..
😂
*
Maybe he is way too possessed that his stock should trade higher than Maybank's market cap.
SUSNew Klang
post Dec 5 2020, 05:36 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,998 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
Cash is king, should have waited for the price to fall further to flush out those using margin trading.
TSBoon3
post Dec 5 2020, 05:47 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,942 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(New Klang @ Dec 5 2020, 05:36 PM)
Cash is king, should have waited for the price to fall further to flush out those using margin trading.
*
Yup. In regardless of whatever theory one may have, as it is, clearly the execution of the buybacks is very poor.

One literally has a mountain of cash (1.2 billion) ... and yet the buyback is showing losses of close to 100 million.


icemanfx
post Dec 5 2020, 08:09 PM

20k VIP Club
*********
All Stars
21,458 posts

Joined: Jul 2012


QUOTE(Boon3 @ Dec 5 2020, 05:47 PM)
Yup. In regardless of whatever theory one may have, as it is, clearly the execution of the buybacks is very poor.

One literally has a mountain of cash (1.2 billion) ... and yet the buyback is showing losses of close to 100 million.
*
However, those who sold to sbb have a mountain of RM 1.2bn cash.

If vendors didn't sell, this paper loss would be their's. Smart and wise move by vendors.

This post has been edited by icemanfx: Dec 5 2020, 08:19 PM
icemanfx
post Dec 5 2020, 08:13 PM

20k VIP Club
*********
All Stars
21,458 posts

Joined: Jul 2012


QUOTE(New Klang @ Dec 5 2020, 05:36 PM)
Cash is king, should have waited for the price to fall further to flush out those using margin trading.
*
With enough cash on hand, flushing our margin players could occur. A dog eat dog bone scenario.

This post has been edited by icemanfx: Dec 5 2020, 08:18 PM
TSBoon3
post Dec 6 2020, 12:05 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,942 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(Boon3 @ Dec 4 2020, 06:03 PM)
Update for the week ending 4th Dec 2020

user posted image

Total number shares bought from 9th Nov to 4th Dec... 175,800,100
Sum paid for these shares = RM1,267,158,283.99

Average price for these shares is ... 7.20795

Closing price of Top Glove on 4 Dec = 6.65

Marked to market, the total market value of these shares bought back is RM1,174,344,668.00


Current marked to market prices losses is RM98,087,618.99
*
Ahhh..... let me say this on the marked to market prices of these shares bought back.

From the Star biz:

QUOTE
there is no requirement for treasury shares to be marked to market with changes between the cost and market price to be recognised in the profit and loss account.


Source: https://www.thestar.com.my/business/busines...glove-share-buy

There lies the issue with buybacks...

Companies doesn't need to report the end result from their buyback actions.

If right now, TG gives these share buybacks as a reward to its share holders, how many share holders are wise enough to realise that the way the shares were bought back, they had actually received 98 million less in dividends.

Yup... this is the way it is.

So before one goes yippee kay yay over buyback shares as dividends, do realise that perhaps an outright cash dividend is simply much better!



icemanfx
post Dec 6 2020, 12:58 PM

20k VIP Club
*********
All Stars
21,458 posts

Joined: Jul 2012


QUOTE(Boon3 @ Dec 6 2020, 12:05 PM)
Ahhh..... let me say this on the marked to market prices of these shares bought back.

From the Star biz:
Source: https://www.thestar.com.my/business/busines...glove-share-buy

There lies the issue with buybacks...

Companies doesn't need to report the end result from their buyback actions.

If right now, TG gives these share buybacks as a reward to its share holders, how many share holders are wise enough to realise that the way the shares were bought back, they had actually received 98 million less in dividends.

Yup... this is the way it is.

So before one goes yippee kay yay over buyback shares as dividends, do realise that perhaps an outright cash dividend is simply much better!
*
Most retailers miss the forest for the tree; as long as they are making money, they don't care or bother with macro picture.

This post has been edited by icemanfx: Dec 6 2020, 01:14 PM
HereToLearn
post Dec 6 2020, 02:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,282 posts

Joined: Sep 2019
QUOTE(Boon3 @ Dec 6 2020, 12:05 PM)
Ahhh..... let me say this on the marked to market prices of these shares bought back.

From the Star biz:
Source: https://www.thestar.com.my/business/busines...glove-share-buy

There lies the issue with buybacks...

Companies doesn't need to report the end result from their buyback actions.

If right now, TG gives these share buybacks as a reward to its share holders, how many share holders are wise enough to realise that the way the shares were bought back, they had actually received 98 million less in dividends.

Yup... this is the way it is.

So before one goes yippee kay yay over buyback shares as dividends, do realise that perhaps an outright cash dividend is simply much better!
*
Share this to the stock market discussion (98m less)
TSBoon3
post Dec 6 2020, 02:44 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,942 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(HereToLearn @ Dec 6 2020, 02:31 PM)
Share this to the stock market discussion (98m less)
*
No need la. Most there only see what they want to see. wink.gif
Kadaj
post Dec 6 2020, 06:48 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
586 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(Boon3 @ Dec 6 2020, 12:05 PM)
Ahhh..... let me say this on the marked to market prices of these shares bought back.

From the Star biz:
Source: https://www.thestar.com.my/business/busines...glove-share-buy

There lies the issue with buybacks...

Companies doesn't need to report the end result from their buyback actions.

If right now, TG gives these share buybacks as a reward to its share holders, how many share holders are wise enough to realise that the way the shares were bought back, they had actually received 98 million less in dividends.

Yup... this is the way it is.

So before one goes yippee kay yay over buyback shares as dividends, do realise that perhaps an outright cash dividend is simply much better!
*
In accounting point of view, if the company making some loss in normal business circumstance, the loss can reduce the taxable income which mean pay lesser tax.
In SBB circumstance, if company spending cash to SBB and making loss, how does it affect the financial book? Are they entitle to pay less tax?
If not, is the act of SBB in this case in the best practice and benefit the shareholders?
TSBoon3
post Dec 6 2020, 07:18 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,942 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(Kadaj @ Dec 6 2020, 06:48 PM)
In accounting point of view, if the company making some loss in normal business circumstance, the loss can reduce the taxable income which mean pay lesser tax.
In SBB circumstance, if company spending cash to SBB and making loss, how does it affect the financial book? Are they entitle to pay less tax?
If not, is the act of SBB in this case in the best practice and benefit the shareholders?
*
What I know is buybacks is not tax deductable.

Well.. based on current data, would you want cash or distribution of the shares bought back?
Kadaj
post Dec 6 2020, 07:38 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
586 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(Boon3 @ Dec 6 2020, 07:18 PM)
What I know is buybacks is not tax deductable.

Well.. based on current data, would you want cash or distribution of the shares bought back?
*
The money should be used for reinvestment and generating more profit or rewarding shareholders by distributing dividends rather than SBB with my 2 cents.
It's a very good lecture class in this topic.

Maybe EPF needs money very badly at the moment and TG providing support? haha
icemanfx
post Dec 6 2020, 11:50 PM

20k VIP Club
*********
All Stars
21,458 posts

Joined: Jul 2012


QUOTE(Kadaj @ Dec 6 2020, 07:38 PM)
The money should be used for reinvestment and generating more profit or rewarding shareholders by distributing dividends rather than SBB with my 2 cents.
It's a very good lecture class in this topic.

Maybe EPF needs money very badly at the moment and TG providing support? haha
*
If topg is to distribute these sbb treasure shares as dividend payment, is a reward to all shareholders.

TSBoon3
post Dec 7 2020, 09:08 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,942 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(Kadaj @ Dec 6 2020, 07:38 PM)
The money should be used for reinvestment and generating more profit or rewarding shareholders by distributing dividends rather than SBB with my 2 cents.
It's a very good lecture class in this topic.

*
Oh, yes. That's one of at the arguments on Wall Street currently. Many large corporations used money extensively for buybacks which ultimately left not much money for reinvestment and research. There was even an article on WSJ recently.

Clearly, if I was a Top Glove shareholder and seeing how badly executed/managed the buybacks, I for one, would demand cash dividend.
xAmdx
post Dec 8 2020, 01:42 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
487 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(Boon3 @ Dec 7 2020, 09:08 AM)
Oh, yes. That's one of at the arguments on Wall Street currently. Many large corporations used money extensively for buybacks which ultimately left not much money for reinvestment and research. There was even an article on WSJ recently.

Clearly, if I was a Top Glove shareholder and seeing how badly executed/managed the buybacks, I for one, would demand cash dividend.
*
IMO, there may be something which the owner and the shareholder is doing at the back to prevent the stock from going down further, end of the day TG was always on the spotlight during recent times. From the dorm issue, lockdown on multiple factory due to workers infected with covid, kena sue by gov for their issue.
I think they wanted to maintain the stock price at certain target so they can list their share on HK at a better price or maybe founder ambition to be top 500 company in the world.
TSBoon3
post Dec 8 2020, 01:55 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,942 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(xAmdx @ Dec 8 2020, 01:42 PM)
IMO, there may be something which the owner and the shareholder is doing at the back to prevent the stock from going down further, end of the day TG was always on the spotlight during recent times. From the dorm issue, lockdown on multiple factory due to workers infected with covid, kena sue by gov for their issue.
I think they wanted to maintain the stock price at certain target so they can list their share on HK at a better price or maybe founder ambition to be top 500 company in the world.
*
Yes, preventing the stock from falling, is a noble idea but what about the day when almost 100 million was splashed on buyback with price ranging from 6.20 to 8.00. Do see posting #2.


SUSNew Klang
post Dec 8 2020, 04:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,998 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
QUOTE(xAmdx @ Dec 8 2020, 01:42 PM)
IMO, there may be something which the owner and the shareholder is doing at the back to prevent the stock from going down further, end of the day TG was always on the spotlight during recent times. From the dorm issue, lockdown on multiple factory due to workers infected with covid, kena sue by gov for their issue.
I think they wanted to maintain the stock price at certain target so they can list their share on HK at a better price or maybe founder ambition to be top 500 company in the world.
*
What is the purpose of listing in HK?

TG is cash rich and splurging on SBB, should need to raise more case from HK. 😆

10 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0249sec    1.45    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 12:09 PM