making mountain out of molehill

then don't make molehills in the first place

Dumbest doublethink poster ever

They cannot handle jokes. Very sensitive group of people can easily get triggered.

So the far left has taken root in /k

Ok gesture is offensive .. OK

This only make me respect angryjoe even more

so its a karen platform why i never heard of these

Some even go dumb and claimed he never played the game even though Angry Joe streamed the whole thing live.

apparently the poster misrepresents what popper actually meant


(1:38 onwards)

No loss

of course, tak sedar diri ppl. They are the one that is on the pulpit in that poster shutting down people's freedom of thought and expression i.e. intolerant, they think they are the one being suppressed. To the point where someone that says they don't like a game because of certain characters = existential threat of free society that needs to be treated like enemy combatant. Strawberry gen x99

Funny.

This post has been edited by bonedragon: Jul 8 2020, 03:46 PM

Fair

Angry Joe spoke his mind and RF are entitled to their opinion as well.

Dont like comment, then delete and ban

This is a simplification of the issue. True Joe has a right to his opinion and Reset have freedom to choose what they want to host.

But by Karl Popper's observation which I quite agree, you can see which side is shutting down conversation and discourse and being intolerant to other ideas. They are the one rioting, doxing, cancelling and beating up people. So we have to see them for who they are. They are power hungry people who use the mask of moral superiority to put you down.

Lefties love to cannibalise each other lmao. They're like shark once they smell blood on the water, they're gonna come get ya.

Mana mana sama jer

Bangga land... Lu cabar... Dia suruh u tak suka u keluar....

Bangga sangat....

interested to know your thoughts on the bawah -
who determines who is "openly/extreme intolerant" that justifies destruction?
is supporting "Black Lives Matter" intolerant?
is supporting "All Lives Matter" intolerant?
is supporting "Blue Lives Matter" intolerant?
is supporting "India Lives Matter" intolerant?
is supporting "Single Lives Matter" intolerant?
Is supporting "MAGA" intolerant?

This post has been edited by nasiputih: Jul 9 2020, 03:29 PM

From reading seems like Joe's whole "they banned me because they don't like critical reviews of TLOU2" is pretty much a red herring he's using to distract from the real reasons, ie the misogyny and the assault allegations.

Its funny how his supporters in here use the evidence for this (ie that other critical reviewers like YongYea weren't banned) as somehow being evidence supporting him. If they were banning people for being critical then others who are critical would also be banned, but they aren't. So ... maybe there's more to this than that?

Its like some people can't see what's directly in front of them, and would rather invent something to explain what they see.

after reading the actual words from karl popper, the fake comic poster is truly misrepresenting/misleading and faking karl pooper, to justify destroying dissenting opinion.
karl said to defend the intolerant opinions, with rational counter-arguments and public opinions. NOT with suppression or destruction.

"Less well known [than other paradoxes Popper discusses] is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.—In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant."

This post has been edited by nasiputih: Jul 9 2020, 03:26 PM

got links for these "ie the misogyny and the assault allegations."