From reading seems like Joe's whole "they banned me because they don't like critical reviews of TLOU2" is pretty much a red herring he's using to distract from the real reasons, ie the misogyny and the assault allegations.

Its funny how his supporters in here use the evidence for this (ie that other critical reviewers like YongYea weren't banned) as somehow being evidence supporting him. If they were banning people for being critical then others who are critical would also be banned, but they aren't. So ... maybe there's more to this than that?

Its like some people can't see what's directly in front of them, and would rather invent something to explain what they see.

Did you read the post I quoted?

Well its a moot point. ResetEra justified their actions by using claims of misogyny and assault allegations (read the links already posted). Whether they are true, or not true, proven or unproven, they exist, and that's the justification used for the ban. You can agree or disagree with that, but you can't turn around and say they banned him because of his critical review on TLOU2, considering others who had the same opinions about the game were not banned.

You can say its unfair that he was banned for that, but you can't say he was banned for not liking the game, that's proven to not be the case.

That was the simple point that was made in my post, but you guys are going on some tangent, basically proving the final sentence I wrote in my earlier post .

Did you even read the post you quoted?

Also do you understand what the word 'bigot' means? Holy non-sequitor batman.

"You", as in me? ... Once again, did you read the post I quoted? Since when am I going around insisting what reason he was banned for as if I did it.
This is like shooting the reporter for reporting something someone else said.

Why do I even bother engaging with people who clearly have the comprehension ability of a toddler. I should know better by now than to wade into these screaming autistic incel threads. I can only blame myself