Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Angry Joe & SkillUp banned for life...

views
     
TSnakal_mode
post Jul 9 2020, 03:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
QUOTE(ray123 @ Jul 8 2020, 02:17 PM)
YongYea was also critical of the game and how the new characters were unlikable. Where's the pile-on?
*
ResetEra don't have anything nice to say about YongYea either.
TSnakal_mode
post Jul 9 2020, 03:31 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
QUOTE(RViN @ Jul 9 2020, 03:25 PM)
From reading seems like Joe's whole "they banned me because they don't like critical reviews of TLOU2" is pretty much a red herring he's using to distract from the real reasons, ie the misogyny and the assault allegations.

Its funny how his supporters in here use the evidence for this (ie that other critical reviewers like YongYea weren't banned) as somehow being evidence supporting him. If they were banning people for being critical then others who are critical would also be banned, but they aren't. So ... maybe there's more to this than that?

Its like some people can't see what's directly in front of them, and would rather invent something to explain what they see. shakehead.gif
*
In case you want to know the one that posted the allegations deleted it and decided to "step away" from Twitter after Angry Joe sent her a letter through his lawyer.

At least make sure you get the information correct.
TSnakal_mode
post Jul 9 2020, 03:33 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
QUOTE(nasiputih @ Jul 9 2020, 03:27 PM)
got links for these "ie the misogyny and the assault allegations."
*
The allegations is here.
https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=4984492

The backpedalling is here.
https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=4985697
nasiputih
post Jul 9 2020, 03:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
256 posts

Joined: May 2014

QUOTE(nakal_mode @ Jul 9 2020, 03:33 PM)
then at the moment, these are unfounded allegations.
we can ban pipu for unfounded allegations?

ukeke is a sexy girl. get her!
TSnakal_mode
post Jul 9 2020, 03:49 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
QUOTE(nasiputih @ Jul 9 2020, 03:44 PM)
then at the moment, these are unfounded allegations.
we can ban pipu for unfounded allegations?

ukeke is a sexy girl. get her!
*
According to those MeToo movement supporter, feminazis, liberal extremist, and believe all women supporter, yes, because you need to believe all women who say they are molested or assaulted even without evidence.
SerioseCat
post Jul 9 2020, 03:50 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
503 posts

Joined: May 2008


I hereby state the amount of fucks I give to Resetera Forum :

And the amount of fucks I give to AngryJoe :
Currylaksa
post Jul 9 2020, 05:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,616 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(nakal_mode @ Jul 9 2020, 03:31 PM)
In case you want to know the one that posted the allegations deleted it and decided to "step away" from Twitter after Angry Joe sent her a letter through his lawyer.

At least make sure you get the information correct.
*
Note that those aren't proofs of his innocence (although the reverse is also true)

A C&D doesn't necessarily progress to actual lawsuit if accuser continues with the story. Even if a lawsuit by small chance occurs, it usually degenerates into she-said he-said.

An accuser may have been intimidated into withdrawing from social media out of fear and fanbase threats.
TSnakal_mode
post Jul 9 2020, 05:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
QUOTE(Currylaksa @ Jul 9 2020, 05:08 PM)
Note that those aren't proofs of his innocence (although the reverse is also true)

A C&D doesn't necessarily progress to actual lawsuit if accuser continues with the story. Even if a lawsuit by small chance occurs, it usually degenerates into she-said he-said.

An accuser may have been intimidated into withdrawing from social media out of fear and fanbase threats.
*
She debunked her own lies.

She claimed Angry Joe took away her phone and forbid her to contact others when she has been posting photos of her in the event all night long.

The story she posted also shows that she is the one that led Angry Joe on instead of Angry Joe forcing her.
RViN
post Jul 10 2020, 11:12 AM

There Is Only One United
*******
Senior Member
5,827 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Selayang, Selangor


QUOTE(nasiputih @ Jul 9 2020, 03:27 PM)
got links for these "ie the misogyny and the assault allegations."
*
Did you read the post I quoted?

QUOTE(nakal_mode @ Jul 9 2020, 03:31 PM)
In case you want to know the one that posted the allegations deleted it and decided to "step away" from Twitter after Angry Joe sent her a letter through his lawyer.

At least make sure you get the information correct.
*
Well its a moot point. ResetEra justified their actions by using claims of misogyny and assault allegations (read the links already posted). Whether they are true, or not true, proven or unproven, they exist, and that's the justification used for the ban. You can agree or disagree with that, but you can't turn around and say they banned him because of his critical review on TLOU2, considering others who had the same opinions about the game were not banned.

You can say its unfair that he was banned for that, but you can't say he was banned for not liking the game, that's proven to not be the case.

That was the simple point that was made in my post, but you guys are going on some tangent, basically proving the final sentence I wrote in my earlier post wink.gif .
Zarazagoza
post Jul 10 2020, 11:27 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
246 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
QUOTE(nakal_mode @ Jul 9 2020, 03:33 PM)
after reading this, i have to remind myself never to compliment the ladies thru personal messaging lest i want to be chopped as sexual predator.
TSnakal_mode
post Jul 10 2020, 12:05 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
QUOTE(RViN @ Jul 10 2020, 11:12 AM)
Did you read the post I quoted?
Well its a moot point. ResetEra justified their actions by using claims of misogyny and assault allegations (read the links already posted). Whether they are true, or not true, proven or unproven, they exist, and that's the justification used for the ban. You can agree or disagree with that, but you can't turn around and say they banned him because of his critical review on TLOU2, considering others who had the same opinions about the game were not banned.

You can say its unfair that he was banned for that, but you can't say he was banned for not liking the game, that's proven to not be the case.

That was the simple point that was made in my post, but you guys are going on some tangent, basically proving the final sentence I wrote in my earlier post  wink.gif .
*
Then maybe you should also explains the "bigoted remarks" part.

Fact is, he was banned after he uploaded his Last of Us 2 review, not after allegations was made against him way back in June which the accuser backpedaled and deleted.

If you insist that he was banned for the allegation, this just made it even worst because the "bigoted remarks" means he was banned partly because he defended himself against false allegations.

So man are not allowed to defend themselves against false allegations anymore else it is "bigoted remarks"?
RViN
post Jul 10 2020, 12:19 PM

There Is Only One United
*******
Senior Member
5,827 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Selayang, Selangor


QUOTE(nakal_mode @ Jul 10 2020, 12:05 PM)
Then maybe you should also explains the "bigoted remarks" part.

Fact is, he was banned after he uploaded his Last of Us 2 review, not after allegations was made against him way back in June which the accuser backpedaled and deleted.

If you insist that he was banned for the allegation, this just made it even worst because the "bigoted remarks" means he was banned partly because he defended himself against false allegations.

So man are not allowed to defend themselves against false allegations anymore else it is "bigoted remarks"?
*
Did you even read the post you quoted?

Also do you understand what the word 'bigot' means? Holy non-sequitor batman.

QUOTE(nakal_mode @ Jul 10 2020, 12:05 PM)
"If you insist that he was banned for the allegation"
*
"You", as in me? ... Once again, did you read the post I quoted? Since when am I going around insisting what reason he was banned for as if I did it.
This is like shooting the reporter for reporting something someone else said.

Why do I even bother engaging with people who clearly have the comprehension ability of a toddler. I should know better by now than to wade into these screaming autistic incel threads. I can only blame myself doh.gif
TrialGone
post Jul 10 2020, 12:33 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
603 posts

Joined: Sep 2017
QUOTE(ray148 @ Jul 8 2020, 01:35 PM)
Good. AngryJoe is fucking trash anyway. Dude always drunk when playing a game on stream and pass it off to his friends constantly yet always try to give super lenghty review as if he knows better. He's also a gun nut who defended the use of AK47 when there were mass shooting too.

user posted image

Seems idiot here keep using "SJW" when that abbreviation was in fact coined by the gamergaters themselves --- which 99% consists of racist, transphobic, homophobic, incels white male.
Keep being stupid /k.
*
That.... Is stupid. If the guy is intolerant but does no harm or impacting people's life, that's his own opinion. That is how tolerance with the intolerance can work, just carry one with ur life. U can disagree with him, argue with him but to strip him of citizenship is a little extreme (aka ban). U don't have to tolerate with the racist but AJ is reviewing a game and just said he doesn't like it and got banned???

Also using Hitler analogy is so whack since they are committing genocide not expressing opinion. Big difference.

6 Pages « < 4 5 6Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0235sec    0.22    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 03:29 AM