Only 22k kms???

Check your alignment other than -2° camber issue above.

Edit: Besides, aquaplane at > 100 km/hr may be helped with alignment adjustment whilst checking such.

This post has been edited by zeng: Jan 12 2022, 10:18 AM

In the absence of a current wheel alignment report for front and rear tires, IF the tyre lifespan can't exceed 50/60K km with a residual tread depth of 1.6-2.0'ish mm the tyre noise may be an indication of a wheel alignment issue.

This post has been edited by zeng: Jun 7 2025, 02:10 PM

Holyshit you have a messy and big wheel alignment problem on hand to handle bro, if ever it could be overcome.

No, it's not tyre brand/model/manufacturing/design problem.

The rear wheel alignment is not only bad, it is real real bad.

Read your rear Total Toes value (3.8/2.2 mm).

In order not to cluster this thread on CR1 tyres, I'll suggest you pose the question/problem of your tyre noise, accelerated tyre wear rate etc on a thread (Alignment Discussion - How to interpret wheel alignment numbers?) started by me as follows:

https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/5080912

Meanwhile Google and read up on topics like types of tyre wear pattern, cambers, toe in, toe out, rear torsion beam design etc.

This post has been edited by zeng: Jun 10 2025, 05:54 PM

No.
It's not the old spec or the new spec, ,(if any) OR tight wheel alignment specification range or the wide/loose specification range in itself that leads to the accelerated tyre wear rate that results in accelerated increase in tyre noise level.

It's the absolute values of rear tire toes (despite a certain margin of errors of measurement) that causes accelerated tyre wear > accelerated tyre noise increase in this case.

This post has been edited by zeng: Jun 14 2025, 04:57 PM