You don’t actually need to look at the IP logs to realize that an account registered in April and talking about things that happened months before that is obviously a dupe account do you?

You don’t actually need to look at the IP logs to realize that an account registered in April and talking about things that happened months before that is obviously a dupe account do you?

I am actually impressed with her and like her style when we exchange topic about vaccine and stuff. LOLOL..

View of my in law's house from Tanjong Golf Course. A round of Golf and brought along my nanny, driver, PA etc. Something Ladytarot99 would say probably?

Probably a dupe. Just sayin

Not me la dumbo.

Yes, no issues at all. That’s why I’m somewhat perplexed why people would get so butthurt over something like this.

empire referring to you or LT 

Not me la dumbo.

You don’t actually need to look at the IP logs to realize that an account registered in April and talking about things that happened months before that is obviously a dupe account do you?

Probably a dupe. Just sayin

Why does this piece of information linger in your mind tho?

Son. i got bad news..ur reading comprehension needs to be brushed up

View of my in law's house from Tanjong Golf Course. A round of Golf and brought along my nanny, driver, PA etc. Something Ladytarot99 would say probably?

kasi chan la macha bossku..

dont end ladytarot's fantasy postings like that..

This is my personal opinion - and I believe it was quite clearly articulated.

Originally, I was of the opinion that it wasn't obligatory - since this is the internet, and I shouldn't have to offer an explanation to justify anything to anyone.  However, as @bearbearwong pointed out in a later reply, "men of substance" should not let a challenge go unanswered (apologies for the paraphrase) - and on reflection, he does have a point.

As an example, I off-handedly mentioned a certain sum of money that my wife keeps stashed away in cash form (in the larger context of an on-going discussion), in the house safe. @fun_feng then essentially said (pardon the pun play) "show me the money". Now, since I was the big-mouthed idiot that brought up the subject, then I feel it is incumbent on me to back up my claim - which, as per a gentleman's agreement (to which @fun_feng has indeed honoured, much to his credit), occurred as promised.

However, if I were talking about matters of finance and sharing my (admittedly layperson-level) know-how, and someone rocks up and challenges me to prove to him that I should be taken seriously - by showing him my bank balance, or the stash of cash, or how many gold bars I have in the vault, or whatever, then, for all intents and purposes, he can take a hike off the edge of the nearest cliff.

I hope this explanation has helped to further clarify my stance.

I must admit i have my reservation and doubt, thank you for clarifying things..

The good doctor is indeed legit, and as they say

He talk the talk, he walk the walk