Uh , no . Not even close .
I know what X90H is capable of , I have calibrated 3 units of this TV since last year .
People who said they look identical are none but who took a simple glance in the store .
You are literally comparing a LCD TV with 32 zones of light control with 8 millions individually-lit pixels .
Meaning ? You have to divide the whole screen into 32 zones , any bright object which is smaller than 4% of the screen is going to cause blooming and thus reduced contrast and dynamic range surrounding the object.
Now consider both contrast and dynamic range are important factors in determining picture quality , LCD TV would need to reach at least 1000 cd/m2 - 1500 cd/m2 to achieve the same level of pop and dynamic range .
Even when they do , there are plenty of issues such as blooming and uneven bright uniformity due to current flawed implementation of FALD .
These effects are further alleviated when you're in a dark room , where true black shows its " true colors " by melting into the backtround , giving you a sense of depth like no others .
Add in the fact that a large majority of the OLED TV came from the flagship series featuring the best anti reflective coating & best picture processing , comparing it with an OLED TV is simply unrealistic .
This is not to say X90H sucks and in fact it is one of the best mid-range LCD we have gotten in the past few years .
Let's just say X90H is in a very good spot for the bang of your bucks .
I once saw a 950G in a bright showroom and I was very impressed.