Better these days, no plans to leave her anytime soon.

With your permission, can I sell your story to TVB?  ... But  not sure how much can fetch with no ending part. Lol.

MIL take no action, nothing can be done.

1 slap to keep the house, why not? Else sleep on street when house kena lelong.

Ask your MIL if the house was a gift to her for marrying your FIL? Tell the court then if it goes that far.

Wedding ring FIL wants to take back, ok lor if that can helps.

COURT'S POWER TO DIVIDE MATRIMONIAL ASSETS

Section 76 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 ("Act") empowers the Malaysian court, when granting a decree of divorce or judicial separation, to order the division between the parties of any assets acquired during the marriage.

In this regard, a distinction is drawn between those assets acquired by the joint efforts of both husband and wife and those acquired by the sole effort of one spouse.

Division of jointly acquired assets

The principles governing jointly acquired assets are set out in sections 76(1) and 76(2) of the Act, where the court is directed to incline towards equality of division, having regard to:

    the extent of the contributions made by each party in money, property or work towards the acquiring of the assets;
    any debts owing by either party which were contracted for their joint benefit; and
    the needs of minor children, if any, of the marriage.

Division of assets acquired by the sole effort of one spouse

On the other hand, sections 76(3) and 76(4) deal with solely acquired assets and the factors to be taken into consideration are:

    the extent of the contributions made by the party who did not acquire the assets to the welfare of the family by looking after the home or by caring for the family; and
    the needs of the minor children, if any, of the marriage.

Subject to the above considerations, the court may divide the assets or the sale proceeds in such proportions as it thinks reasonable but in any case the acquirer shall get a greater proportion.

WHAT CONSTITUTES MATRIMONIAL ASSETS?

For parties who are getting a divorce or contemplating one, it is pertinent to know just what kind of property will be classified as matrimonial property and thus subjected to division upon divorce. The Act is silent on what constitutes matrimonial assets but from a study of case law, the following have been held to comprise matrimonial assets:

    The matrimonial home and everything put into it by either spouse to be used jointly and severally for the benefit of the family as a whole;
    All landed properties acquired during the marriage apart from the matrimonial home;
    Cars, cash in bank accounts, jewellery, shares in companies including the family business(es) and even club memberships if acquired during the marriage;
    Contributions made to the Employees' Provident Fund during the marriage;
    Insurance policies, gratuity payments, employment and retirement benefits accumulated during the marriage by either or both spouse(s);
    Assets owned by one party before the marriage, provided that such assets have been "substantially improved" by the other party during the marriage or by their joint efforts (section 76(5) of the Act);
    Gifts from one spouse to the other, especially gifts of substantive value.

Assuming the FIL is successful with getting a RM400,000 loan in his daughter's name who is going to pay the loan? If she pays the loan is the RM1 million condo really going to be sold to her for RM400K?

Who is the legal wife here?

1st wife? If so, why give a damn... just walk away.

At this moment wife is extremely angry at the father as she views the entire episode as a betrayal. She told me she views it no differently than me borrowing or taking her money to help another woman. She couldn't care less if the father was homeless or starving. Same goes for the SIL and MIL.

As for why can't split? Well when one thinks that property belongs to her and her husband wants to use it to help offspring from another woman, I think naturally there are some emotions that will go on.

As for why no money still willing to pay that type of money for a surname?? This is something that beats me too.

She openly admits to leeching and she doesn't view it as anything amiss since she is married to me.... in fact she does take my money = her money very seriously.

Anyway a quick update to this.

After discussing their options with a lawyer.

MIL decided to do the following :-

i) Transfer the condo to both her daughters and will remove her name off the title.
ii) She will move out from that condo.
iii) She will get the 2 daughters to take care of her finances using rental from that condo.
iv) She will initiate divorce proceedings upon settling into a new rented house.

They do believe if he is kicked out that he would probably go back to the 1st wife's house.

Yup they are into ancestor worship which I think may have something to do with why he is so gung-ho on a child bearing his family name.

Haha... my wife only thinks everything of mine belongs to her. No such thing as half as she like the MIL they believe if they don't own everything of his then another woman can own it too.
Well as repugnant as it is a situation I will definitely have to stand behind her instead of staying neutral.
_______

I would imagine the situation with your father must have opened up some deep raw wounds, hope it has healed by now.
_______

You sure do feel strongly for him

Anyway just so you know MIL did tell him she was putting the 2 daughters' names on the title of the condo and only after that they would look into getting a mortgage on it. What she did not tell him was that she is removing her name off the deed as well.

He was agreeable to it and is still under the impression he will be getting his money.

As for getting him out, currently MIL has some knee issues and can't walk far. We are renting a single storey house paid 50:50 by both daughters and both of them will get moved to the rented house. Once he is out, locks will be changed and will get a contractor to start hacking to make the place inhabitable.

Once he is out of there and transfer complete, he will be told mortgage only for RM120,000 and will be told no money to give him as must pay stamp duty and legal fees plus the renovations needed to rent it out. If he doesn't put up a fuss MIL will just let him be, if he does then she will tell him the house they are staying in their 2 daughters rented for her so he has to get out. If he don't want to get out then we will find her another house and let him deal with the landlord.

As you put it earlier hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
_______

1) She doesn't want any part of the condo to go to him in an event of a contested divorce.

2) At this moment the 3 women couldn't care less if that's what happens to him as they view it that he has betrayed them and they are basically fed up with him.

3) MIL's upkeep is mostly through the 2 daughters giving her RM500 each every month. If she loses the condo then she will live with the 2nd daughter I guess?
Doubt my father would agree to that

He is a boy.

Yes quite unexpected that they took him in especially as it does appear that they aren't exactly well off.

He also told the MIL he wanted a divorce and he has already taken what he wanted to take and from now on he didn't want to speak to her or her 2 daughters again. Told her good luck in her life as no one will take care of her from then onward.

Looks like things are not turning out as planned, for your MIL and her Team A.

Your FIL has his Team B.

He is a boy.

Yes quite unexpected that they took him in especially as it does appear that they aren't exactly well off.

He also told the MIL he wanted a divorce and he has already taken what he wanted to take and from now on he didn't want to speak to her or her 2 daughters again. Told her good luck in her life as no one will take care of her from then onward.
He said he did not take the registration card. Just found it, turns out it is in my safe at the bank.

Yes we changed the locks, he returned the key and access cards which we told the management to cancel access in case it had been cloned. 

Well at the end of it I told my wife to give him RM5,000 and told him to use it to treat the issues with his knees, he threw the money back at her saying he didn't want any money from them.

TV? He admitted to taking it but said he had given it as a gift to his 1st(ex)wife. Told the MIL if she wanted it back to go get it herself as he was done doing things for her. I told my MIL to let it be we will buy her a new and better TV. She is still sulking that she did not get back her TV.

MIL lives with us. I was the one that told her to pack her bags and come live with us till we sort things out for her. She is in good nick of health.

It is unlikely the FIL would file for divorce anytime soon. Unlikely he has the financial means for any legal battles. Title of the condo is in the midst of being transferred. Should be done in the next 2 weeks.

Our lawyer had some interesting pieces of news, it turns out the house he is living at now is under his name and his name alone and he been owning that house for the last 30 years. Also discovered was he does own a condo as well and he bought it 18 years ago. MIL believes the condo was the one he bought for his mistress but according to the PI our lawyer sent the condo was a student ghetto. Caveats were immediately placed on both. A quick check on iProperty revealed the house he is staying at is worth RM850,000 probably less due to the condition and that condo should be worth around RM600,000 thereabout must check what is the size and condition.

They do believe if he is kicked out that he would probably go back to the 1st wife's house.

Yup they are into ancestor worship which I think may have something to do with why he is so gung-ho on a child bearing his family name.

Haha... my wife only thinks everything of mine belongs to her. No such thing as half as she like the MIL they believe if they don't own everything of his then another woman can own it too.
Well as repugnant as it is a situation I will definitely have to stand behind her instead of staying neutral.

I would imagine the situation with your father must have opened up some deep raw wounds, hope it has healed by now.
You sure do feel strongly for him

Anyway just so you know MIL did tell him she was putting the 2 daughters' names on the title of the condo and only after that they would look into getting a mortgage on it. What she did not tell him was that she is removing her name off the deed as well.

He was agreeable to it and is still under the impression he will be getting his money.

As for getting him out, currently MIL has some knee issues and can't walk far.We are renting a single storey house paid 50:50 by both daughters and both of them will get moved to the rented house. Once he is out, locks will be changed and will get a contractor to start hacking to make the place inhabitable.

Once he is out of there and transfer complete, he will be told mortgage only for RM120,000 and will be told no money to give him as must pay stamp duty and legal fees plus the renovations needed to rent it out. If he doesn't put up a fuss MIL will just let him be, if he does then she will tell him the house they are staying in their 2 daughters rented for her so he has to get out. If he don't want to get out then we will find her another house and let him deal with the landlord.

As you put it earlier hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
1) She doesn't want any part of the condo to go to him in an event of a contested divorce.

2) At this moment the 3 women couldn't care less if that's what happens to him as they view it that he has betrayed them and they are basically fed up with him.

3) MIL's upkeep is mostly through the 2 daughters giving her RM500 each every month. If she loses the condo then she will live with the 2nd daughter I guess?
Doubt my father would agree to that

Fixed

All it took was some coaxing, then an appointment with a certain pro at KLSMC, 4 hours and my wallet being RM5,000 lighter. Inclusive of a MRI, fluid and residual drain and gel injection.

Highly recommended.

Good for 5 years or so and next day was good to go for line dancing.