QUOTE(Duperaider @ Oct 30 2019, 06:59 PM)
Lol you generalise first, yes, I am aware of your lengthy post,
TAKE NOTE I just wanted to highlight that medications given out by tcm doctors are registered with bpfk, this time I make it clear, tcm from tungshin lol
Actually, it seems that your knowledge about tcm is only about mixing herbs, which in actual terms is waaasay more than that.
As fur myself, I do have registered tcm products with bpfk, not too sure about you
Take it easy bro, TCM might bit be your cup of tea, but it works fine for so many other ppl lol
Chilax bro
its seems u have bias & are making subjective statements with only anecdotal evidence. TAKE NOTE I just wanted to highlight that medications given out by tcm doctors are registered with bpfk, this time I make it clear, tcm from tungshin lol
Actually, it seems that your knowledge about tcm is only about mixing herbs, which in actual terms is waaasay more than that.
As fur myself, I do have registered tcm products with bpfk, not too sure about you
Take it easy bro, TCM might bit be your cup of tea, but it works fine for so many other ppl lol
Chilax bro
worse, u seem to have missed my point/objective completely despite having 'read' the 'long' post.
worse still, u were selectively cherry picking statements & twisting it to adhere to ur (erroneous) narrative - even then, u got it wrong. no quoting of actual hard facts to back up ur claims & a seeming disregard of the objective way my points were put forth (neither pro or against, just cautioning wateva course of action to be taken). ur statements are so filled with erroneous generalizing, over simplifications, outright misquotes, etc that it would take too long to actually address each of them, even if i was so inclined.
and your statements 'to chill', etc come across as being condescending. forums are meant for exchanging ideas/viewpoints objectively. being threatened when ur view is challenged & resorting to anecdotal statements and personal attacks is unscientific.
here are my hard and verifiable facts:
for every this >
http://tcm.moh.gov.my/en/
https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/...d-out-in-phases
there are also this >
https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/201...n-leave/1100841
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg...e/#24f6cdbf6418
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/201...r/#273708685bd3
... to counter ur anecdotal 'evidence', 3 data backed paragraphs from the above are of particular note:
1) "the major motivation for TCM is money:
"[China] has been aggressively promoting TCM on the international stage both for expanding its global influence and for a share of the estimated US$50-billion global market.""
2) "Critics view TCM practices as unscientific, unsupported by clinical trials, and sometimes dangerous: China’s drug regulator gets more than 230,000 reports of adverse effects from TCM each year."
3) "As the Nature article points out, TCM has been a scam for decades: it was revived and heavily promoted in China by former dictator Mao Zedong, who didn't believe in it himself, but pushed it as a cheap alternative to real medicine. I won't go over that again here, but see these stories from Alan Levinovitz in Slate and David Gorski at Science-based Medicine."
... so recommending alt therapies vs conventional ones should come with a HUGE caveat - it is def riskier due to the lax regulations and untested long terms effects. I MAKE NO MENTION WHATSOEVER OF ITS EFFICACY - thats not my concern.
with that said, this will be my last post here. i'm not inclined to waste my limited post allotments debating biased/close mindedness further.
original objective was to aid a parent in distress - i believe ts has enough prelim info to objectively decide next course of action. can pm me if want referral to a qualified pediatrician. i will not be further visiting this topic. gecmis olsum.
Oct 31 2019, 11:33 AM

Quote
0.0181sec
0.77
5 queries
GZIP Disabled