QUOTE(SKY 1809 @ Aug 23 2009, 10:40 PM)
If placement come in Dec09 let say, you cannot account the whole 51m new shares for year 2009, distorted . pro rated maybe ( my thinking only )
Then the rental income come in at diff timing let say Jan 2010 ? , and some distortions again. let assume full payment of building after collecting cash from placement.
But anyway, the analyst is quite sure , somewhere around RM 2.41, not too far off.
A better judgment is year 2010, if both income and placement are matching on fairer basis.
The assumption is based on DDM of 8.7%
Just my opinion.
SKY,Then the rental income come in at diff timing let say Jan 2010 ? , and some distortions again. let assume full payment of building after collecting cash from placement.
But anyway, the analyst is quite sure , somewhere around RM 2.41, not too far off.
A better judgment is year 2010, if both income and placement are matching on fairer basis.
The assumption is based on DDM of 8.7%
Just my opinion.
Without using DDM, assuming the expected DY of 9%, a fair price of 2.41 would translate to DPU of 0.21 (estimated DPU for FY2009 of 0.16 and FY2010 of 0.15~0.17). What I am saying is, the assumptions used to derive the fair price of 2.41 is impractical. When would this fair price be met? Rental reversions will not be significant for at least a few years, so when would the DPU of 0.21 be met?
Based on my DPU estimations with Kenanga's estimated growth rate of 2.8%, it would take a good 9 years to see a DPU of 0.21.
Aug 23 2009, 11:39 PM
Quote
0.0477sec
0.66
7 queries
GZIP Disabled