Kesian whole family business make less than fresh grad ibd analyst from smu

Lol someone’s tercabar have to call in daddy’s credit card to help

I've been in a programme with a bell curve. Sure, it would mean out of 14 people in my class, only one qualifies as outstanding.

It also meant one of us WILL flunk each semester.

Ka si chan la macha

U is from smu study ibd? If not you are just some old uncle who likes to talk cock only. Probably have a misarable life so come here to talk shit to others.

His protest against the bell curve is valid

But to give them all the same score is stupid

He deserves to be misunderstood

Kesian bodoh tak faham maksud bell curve

Memanglah meritocracy, bengap, yang terbaik dapat A, yang terburuk dapat C

Ni lah hasil budaya tongkat ni, camne nak maju, otak kat lutut sebab tu kena pakai tongkat

So if all bodo, the best bodo will be guaranteed an A?

Get A gooding ma, in the end also work for C student.

I'm very sure azhan82 understands bell curve. He was merely quoting one part and then giving his 2 singkie cents worth of sarcasm I think. Maybe I'm wrong, who knows

This post has been edited by hotjake: May 25 2019, 12:10 AM

But then Architecture course, I thought normal to flunk papers?
Or my IPTS Department like failing students.

Heard they need to resit a couple of papers each year. And students literally sleep in Studio.

its a canadian thing lor....

He wants to let people know that there's no point competing

Work hard together better

My masters was in Virtual Env. Basically computer science with a dose of design.

But yes, it's very normal to flunk architecture. We hold the record of the worst performing programme when it comes to graduating on time

Bell curve is the worst thing to happen because I need to give my bad students an 'A' grade

He's just a racist fucking idiot that's all

lol business school

TIL uni grading also bell curved

what the fuck

Bell curve practice is damn stupid

Must give Singaporeans and International Students that there is Quotas in Life that people that need to work hard to achieve an A.
This is not a tongkat quota

The principles of the Gaussian distribution (bell shape curve) is valid only if n reaches a suitable size, and actually represent the general population....

In a cohort of a few students, it is never representative of the general population, and while ploting marks may get a similar curve, it will be a skewed curve.... therefore using it to assign grades becomes arbitrary....

So if this lecturer's cohort actually lies, say on the upper 2SD if a population curve, and he thinks they deserve an A grade, that's not wrong.....

In other words, if his students are all A students, what's wrong with giving them all the A grade accordingly?