Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Investment StashAway Malaysia, Multi-Region ETF at your fingertips!

views
     
george_dave91
post Oct 5 2021, 02:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


The new thematic portfolios look interesting. I currently have the 36 sri and 22 sri. Was initially thinking of just dumping the 22 into the 36 and just maintain that. Now with the thematics I was thinking of buying into that instead. If my 22 sri is down by about 4% or so would it be a bad time to switch into riskier portfolios like the thematics? I’m just thinking that if my 22 is up that would usually mean that the riskier portfolios are overvalued as well. 🤷‍♂️

Also, not sure which of the three to go into tho I like some of the sub themes of each. Interested in knowing what are your favourites of the 3 main themes tho? Mind sharing?
george_dave91
post Oct 20 2021, 10:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


Hi guys. Does anyone know how to calculate your money weighted return for the year? What is a good way for us to measure the performance for the year, especially if we are investing new sums through the year etc.
george_dave91
post Feb 2 2022, 11:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


What do you guys think of SA returns generally? I kinda feel that my UTs seem to be doing a lil better. Both portfolios have similar-ish risk. Then again now is a bad period time will tell I guess. Interested to know what you guys think tho. How has it been for yal vs your other investments?
george_dave91
post Feb 3 2022, 02:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


QUOTE(MUM @ Feb 2 2022, 11:40 PM)
hmm.gif Both portfolios have similar-ish risk....how does one knows that they are "similar-ish"?
other than that,...does they have they the same start date of entries?

i kind of think,...when and if they are both similar......then ETFs should have "better" roi...for its entry cost & holding cost is lower than unit trusts...
*
Yeah kind of similar I guess, I have a 90:10 UT portfolio between equities and fixed income, and I have 2 portfolios in my SA (36 sri & 22 sri). I have mainly been observing the 2 (UTs and SA) for about 2 years now, not long enough to observe a significant pattern yet tho. I suppose the impact of the difference in fees would only be noticeable several years down the road.


QUOTE(coolguy99 @ Feb 3 2022, 08:34 AM)
I like how they are hassle free, so far the returns are okay. I started investing 4 years back and now my portfolio is around +30%. But of course as some shared it has to do with the timings of my deposit as well. Nonetheless I am just happy to let it run on its own without checking frequently.
*
Yes the hassle free part is really quite the selling point here. Yea the timing thing is a stronger factor when the period considered is shorter. 30+ in 4 years seems decent enough regardless.


QUOTE(Medufsaid @ Feb 3 2022, 09:55 AM)
oooh which funds did you pick for UT? anyway if you had pick a UT that tracks HK (you can say KWEB is a part of Hang Seng Index) then it'll be negative

user posted image

compare against a fund that buys global stocks

user posted image
*
I have 10% in Amanahraya unit trust, 40% in developed markets; Principal global titans, and 50% in APAC markets; Affin select apac ex jp dividend and Principal apac dynamic growth (25% each). Yea its mostly down currently, as is everything else I suppose.


QUOTE(sgh @ Feb 3 2022, 10:13 AM)
It is precisely in a bear market that you know which investment vehicle is performing the best. Ironic but true. Some UT has a benchmark like an index to beat. So unlike ETF which just buy most of the stocks in the index (aka passively managed ETF), UT fund manager need to do extra in order to beat that. This is where a lot of arguments have been going on for years. The ETF supporters are saying basically a passively managed ETF will beat the UT in the long run as most fund manager have lousy skills. So in a bear market we see how the UT perform. Note there are UT that explicitly state that they are not performing against any index at all. For such UT how you compare to it's ETF equivalent (if any) ?

In this bear market, I have observed UT with a heavy duplication of stocks in the index suffer the same fate as the ETF this is only logical. For UT that have lesser stocks in the index and have stocks that are OUTSIDE of the index it perform better (as in drop the least and climb up fastest). UT has this edge over ETF with the assumption the fund manger really are skillful and for this I will say pay the extra UT expense ratio for them to do their job. Of cuz vice versa is also true as in some UT just duplicate the stocks in the index and charge high expense ratio such kind of fund manager really earn monies for nothing so we should not invest in those.
*
Right that makes sense. So essentially UTs would have better downside protection as opposed to robo advisors? Wonder if that means robos would be good for growth for younger investors and then may slowly increase UTs in later years as a retiree or when reaching retirement.

george_dave91
post Feb 7 2022, 09:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


QUOTE(Hoshiyuu @ Feb 7 2022, 12:42 AM)

so long you don't touch the weird products they've put out to attract investors who wanted those portfolio because other platform had it.

---


3. I recommend ignoring Thematics and ESG as they are both flavor of the year products, not to mention the underlying holdings of most Thematics is questionable.

*
Hi man. I notice that youre not too keen on SAs thematics. Was hoping you could elaborate on that. Interested on your opinion regarding the thematics. What else besides the lack of long lasting favor for a particular theme? Are there any of the thematics that you dislike the least maybe? Lol
george_dave91
post May 16 2022, 12:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


Sorry guys might be a little late to anak this, but does anyone know why they drop per exposure to China? Like what was their reasoning behind it? Can’t seem to find the article/ market commentary video about it.
george_dave91
post May 16 2022, 01:03 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


QUOTE(Medufsaid @ May 16 2022, 12:10 AM)
can refer to the newspaper clipping here https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/4750563/+18840
*
Cool. 👍 Thanks a lot man.
george_dave91
post Jun 24 2022, 12:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


So for those of you opting for the flexible portfolio, what do your portfolio allocations look like. I was thinking of just the s&p500 and the apac ETFs for my equity side 75% and 24% in bonds (1% cash mandatory). Not too sure how to allocate the bond side tho. Not sure what’s good/balanced to begin with.
george_dave91
post Jun 24 2022, 12:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


Yeah ideally I’d just wanna get local bonds, but that’s not really an option. I could invest externally in a bond fund to balance things out but then I’d be doing the balancing myself (would be paying 0.8% pa unnecessarily) plus it doesn’t work out with my monthly dca amount.
george_dave91
post Jun 27 2022, 12:34 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Jun 25 2022, 05:18 PM)
It's called EERA. The algorithmic parameters are a closely guarded secret like KFC 11 herbs and spices.
In the absence of VT, the following is how I would construct a 100% equities portfolio to emulate VT's regional allocation with the limited number of regional ETFs:

Description  Ticker Allocation
S&P 500      IVV        55.00%
S&P Small cap IJR          5.00%
Europe        VGK        19.00%
Asia ex-Japan AAXJ        9.00%
Japan        EWJ          6.00%
Canada        EWC          3.00%
Australia    EWA          2.00%
Cash    $$$          1.00%

A 75/24 portfolio would be like this (bond portion could use more refinement):

Description                  Ticker Allocation
S&P 500                      IVV          41.3%
S&P Small cap                IJR          3.8%
Europe                      VGK          15.0%
Asia ex-Japan                AAXJ        6.8%
Japan                        EWJ          4.5%
Canada                      EWC          2.3%
Australia                    EWA          1.5%
International gov bond ex-us IGOV        6.0%
Ex-US corporate bond        BNDX        6.0%
US aggregate bond            AGG          12.0%
Cash                        $$$          1.0%
*
Yes that looks quite comprehensive indeed. Why the low allocation for Asia tho?

I was considering something like the list below. What d’ya think?

Equities (75%)

US - S&P 40%
Asia - AAXJ 25%
Euro - VGK 7%
Jap - EWJ 3%

Others (25%)

Govt bonds
US - TIP 5%
EX US - WIP 5%

Corp bonds
US - FLOT 5%
EX US - BNDX 5%

Commodities
Gold - GLD 4%

Cash
$ 1%

george_dave91
post Jun 29 2022, 03:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Jun 27 2022, 12:07 PM)
On gold, consider that some of gold's performance is already captured as part of equities holdings as mineral mining companies (a quick search shows IVV and AAXJ contain gold mining companies), in equities market-cap weightage. This makes your "gold" holdings a productive asset. Holding gold in its spot equivalent opens up exposure to it as a non-productive asset (i.e. you're holding it for speculative reasons), meaning to say aside from price increase due to speculation, there is no real expected return from gold as it has no revenue, no sales, no dividends. Gold is only a weak inflation hedge according to many literatures. spot gold is a good store of value if you plan to live to 2000 years old (paraphrase). Anyway, many other portfolio construction theories (dragon portfolio, all-weather portfolio, etc) have incorporated spot gold in it, so it's not an outlandish idea to include it.

I personally have no strong opinion on bonds, because it being the Yin to equities' Yang has been shattered as of late. Plus usually bonds come in when you're starting to insulate your capital from market risks, i.e. counting down to retirement.
*
Very well explained. Right so its market cap weighted. I made the initial allocation based on GDP. Based on some of the research online on GDP weighted vs cap weighted in terms of performance, the results seem to be conflicting. Some say one is GDP is better some say market cap is better. Lol I’m quite confused now. All research papers justify their claims and methodology well. Cant quite get why the conflicting results tho.

Yeah with regards to the gold, essentially I’ve learned that it is best to be more prudent as far as risk goes, not necessarily due to tolerance per se, rather I feel that my current emergency fund is not solid enough. Perhaps if i have a full 6-12 mnth emergency fund then I’d consider going fully equities. What do you think about the whole Gdp v market cap debate?

As such i decided to allocate about 25-20% in FI assets. However the returns seem rather lacklustre especially when compared to its risk. Also as you rightly pointed out, recent performance indicates that bonds may no longer be the Yin to equities. Both seem more correlated albeit with varying magnitude. So I thought I’d throw in a bit of gold, being a less correlated asset to add some diversity to that 20/25 part of the portfolio. I suppose i need to do more research regarding fixed income first

george_dave91
post Sep 19 2022, 11:55 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


Hi all. Does anyone understand the advantages of the new “black rock powered” portfolios? Are they any better than the regular SA general investing portfolios?
george_dave91
post Sep 20 2022, 03:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


QUOTE(bcombat @ Sep 19 2022, 05:22 PM)
user posted image

user posted image
*
That’s interesting. So would it be fair to say that the SA GI portfolios are more active than the Blackrock ones? I can see how that could be attractive for those who fear bad calls from a more active/tactical approach like that of the KWEB saga for example. The flip side would also be true then, whereby the Blackrock ones would be less likely be able to put perform the market over the long term (but would be more or less the same just slightly lower perhaps). Relatively to the SA ones that is.
george_dave91
post Sep 21 2022, 09:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


QUOTE(Medufsaid @ Sep 20 2022, 07:31 PM)
oh got blackrock seminar today. let's see if i can get a copy of the videobetter to find reviews of blackrock from more neutral sources
*
Yeah that was a loaded one, lots to unpack . Waiting for the uploaded version.
george_dave91
post Oct 14 2022, 07:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


Hey guys. Does anyone have any experience with the flexible portfolios? I’ve got a question about the balancing. Does anyone know what’s the boundaries that trigger the rebalancing? Like is it 5,10,20% off from your target allocation, or something like that?
george_dave91
post Oct 14 2022, 11:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


QUOTE(MUM @ Oct 14 2022, 10:55 PM)
According to this site, ....it is auto rebalanced
When should you review your asset allocation?
While we automatically rebalance your Flexible Portfolio to maintain your target allocation, we won’t reoptimise it.

Read more
https://www.stashaway.my/r/how-to-use-flexible-portfolios

Xxxxxxxxxxxxcc

When our system rebalances a portfolio
Typically, we rebalance your portfolio when its asset allocation moves away from its target boundaries, which also causes your portfolios to move away from its targeted risk level.

For instance, your portfolio may have a target allocation of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. If the value of the stock portion of your portfolio increases to 80%, which is above the target boundaries of the portfolio, our system will sell some stocks to buy some bonds to bring your portfolio’s asset allocation and risk level back to its target.

By executing non-trivial logics on thousands of portfolios every day, our system delivers ultimate precision by making sure that your portfolios are always near or at their target asset allocations without restricting you from depositing or withdrawing your funds. This precision allows us to keep your portfolios’ within your expected risk levels all the time, instead of once every quarter. 
.........
But our engineering team built a sophisticated trading system that sets us apart from traditional wealth managers: our system evaluates every single portfolio of every single client every single day.

We also designed our system to evaluate every portfolio before the markets open each day to find out which assets in which of our clients’ portfolios need to be rebalanced. This way, we can place and execute our trade orders on time for all our clients.

Read more, ....
https://www.stashaway.my/r/rebalancing-and-...on-at-stashaway
*
I see I see. So the boundaries that trigger rebalancing is quite large. 60% to 80% before rebalancing is triggered. Would make for a more volatile portfolio. Probably save on rebalancing costs I guess.

george_dave91
post Oct 15 2022, 01:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Oct 15 2022, 12:53 AM)
Didn't notice an announcement for new additions to the Flexible Portfolio ETF selection, but I noticed VT is finally included among the selection under "International Stock Market". It's less ideal than the accumulating ETFs of VWRA, ISAC and the likes, but it's adequate for now. Will be shifting my entire GI portfolio into this.
*
Did not know this was on their list. How new is it?

I moved all my GI predominantly into IVV.
george_dave91
post Oct 17 2022, 01:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


Currently I don’t have much invested also my monthly dca amount is very small. So investing in IVV etc via SA makes sense for the time being. Even with the 0.8 annual fee, seems to be better than unit trusts at the very least.

That being said, at what point do yal think I should consider switching to a brokerage account tho? Like what portfolio size?

Also does it make sense to go full US given that adding Asia/Eur doesn’t seem to lower risk for the past few decades. Seems to add risk if anything. Looking at the long term trends, there are more instances where non US is down while US is up or flat. And when US is down non US would follow too. Hardly see any times where US is down and non US is up or flat. Of course past performance isn’t an indicator of future performance and all but yeah…

Any thoughts?

This post has been edited by george_dave91: Oct 17 2022, 02:03 PM
george_dave91
post Dec 28 2022, 10:01 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


Hi guys.

Was thinking of create a small high risk high reward flexible portfolio for my overall portfolio. What do you guys recommend. Was considering to add a few high risk high reward type ETFs like Nasdaq qqq etc. any ideas what ETFs would be good and what sort of allocation for each?
george_dave91
post Dec 28 2022, 11:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Feb 2021


QUOTE(zstan @ Dec 28 2022, 10:17 AM)
high risk doesn't equate to high reward though. if members here can answer they'd be on the team of SAMY
*
That is true. I suppose what I was referring to are high quality but volatile equity ETFs as opposed to questionable ones or trendy ones that can very likely go to zero and stay there. Know what I mean?

QUOTE(xander2k8 @ Dec 28 2022, 03:26 PM)
Better off DIY as you paying yearly fee instead 🤦‍♀️

Since high risk high reward and buy QQQ DIY is way cheaper
*
Well that may be so. However I’d only be putting in small amounts here monthly. Like less than 100. For the time being at least. When I get better pay I’d increase it accordingly. Also I’m not quite able to invest via any exchange I want due to my job. The one I can’t invest through is kinda pricey for foreign investments. 0.8% pa seems to be the lesser of the evils at this point. Plus for me I do get value through sa mainly thorough their rebalancing, sorting out the paper work such as making claims for some portion of the withheld tax amounts taken from the dividends issued, getting access to fractional shares via an sc regulated platform. Just to name a few.

QUOTE(Yluxion @ Dec 28 2022, 08:27 PM)
1. iShares Core MSCI China ETF
Ticker: 9801:HK

2. iShares Hang Seng Tech ETF
Ticker: 9067:HK

China is opening up, I would say both ETFs above are worth the risks.
*
Wow that is risky indeed. I think the random policy changes make them unjustifiably risky tho. It’s something that we have almost no certainty would return to a favourable state from an investor’s perspective, let alone a foreign investor. Whereas if it were merely market volatility due to economic factors I’d find that to be better risk to reward, given the expected possible returns that is.

Do you feel these would do better than something like the nasdaq 100 or a us small cap etf over a period of 10 years or so tho? What’s your take on this?


2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0733sec    0.73    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 02:50 AM