QUOTE(gooroojee @ Aug 8 2021, 12:09 AM)
Don't think anyone's complaining or not understanding. The fact is SA needs to outperform EPF by quite a bit more than 1% as a reflection of true long term investment, due to the fees. If it only performs at EPF +1% the nett return is the same as EPF, then no point there, especially since the downside risk is there and quite frankly you may lose money, unlike EPF.
Also, even in a 5-10 year horizon, not many funds can perform at a 7% y-o-y average (assuming EPF is 6% average). Yes, there is the question of liquidity, but these days we can withdraw EPF for many things, first and second home, medical, education, etc.
Just thinking out loud, not expecting to convince anyone otherwise. I gave SA 3 years just to try it out. Will see.
those people who withdraw from EPF to 'invest' should get their heads checked seriously.Also, even in a 5-10 year horizon, not many funds can perform at a 7% y-o-y average (assuming EPF is 6% average). Yes, there is the question of liquidity, but these days we can withdraw EPF for many things, first and second home, medical, education, etc.
Just thinking out loud, not expecting to convince anyone otherwise. I gave SA 3 years just to try it out. Will see.
Aug 8 2021, 10:57 AM

Quote
0.3734sec
0.86
7 queries
GZIP Disabled