wahsei .........

goldfries , u macam saya ke , never sleep till now?

post processing ...... in digital , meaning tat editing thru software la , isnt it ?

i never heard dis term in digital b4 . anyway , tat doesnt matter , now i understand wat u guys talk about "pp"

good point

i've also noticed that ppl that are against post processing are mainly ppl that don't have any knowledge about PS, to me it's so *sour grapes*

and even worse, i dunno what is the intention when ppl post up their photos, some of them will mentioned "all the photos are unaltered, no photochopped, just resized". seems like they want to tell everybody "hey, my photos no PP and it still great"

for me if u want to post, just post it, no need to mention whether it been PP or not, unless other forumers request or ask for it, or the photos are use fro benchmarking lens or camera.

I don't think with Fuji taking the picture with 400% dynamic range could capture the whole range yet I just recalled that the picture can probably be captured with HDR

The thing about people saying that certain picture is taken without any PP is probably mainly to show what the camera/lens could give (or to tell you that they can expose properly).

Try taking a picture of a bikini chick running across the backdrop of an evening sun on a beach. I want the babe and the sky and the beach nicely exposed. I would say not many high-contrast situations give you enough time to nicely take multiple, same-spot shots for HDR.

great example there shinchan

another great example

but i see alot of ppl still post those pics and i go like siao eh...