Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD Ryzen /Threadripper OverClocking V1.1, big or small, share your results here...

views
     
owikh84
post Aug 4 2019, 07:25 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Aug 4 2019, 06:46 PM)
suicide run again...  laugh.gif
*
Nice clockin' bro, if possible try to improve the BW efficiency cos now seems slower than your 3600 CL16 run previously.
owikh84
post Aug 4 2019, 11:51 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Aug 4 2019, 09:39 PM)
forgot to change d fclk bro (was using 1866 just now instead of 2100), but i think very high frequency + rather tight timing is needed to beat 1:1 result...  this is already the fast profile usin dram calculator @ 4200, doubt i dare to go extreme profile w/o killin d loaned ram...  sweat.gif ]

Make sense, looks like 3800 CL14 is a thing now for Ryzen.
Anything above will just kill efficiency.

Btw, a 3600/3600X @ 4.2GHz with 60ish ns latency should be able to match 8700K @ 5.0GHz (~1650cb) in CB R15. Not sure if your cooling is still able to handle it.
owikh84
post Aug 13 2019, 09:08 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Aug 13 2019, 10:00 AM)
bdie is heading back to d owner so this is pretty much d last attempt on basic stability test (minus d efficiency as usual...  tongue.gif )

DDR4-4500+ is seriously not bad for a kit that's rated at 3466.
In plan to try Micron E-die?
I heard it might be as good as or even better than B-die in terms of thermal tolerance.
For record, B-die will fly higher if you are able to keep the temp below 42C.

This post has been edited by owikh84: Aug 13 2019, 09:08 PM
owikh84
post Aug 14 2019, 06:49 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



Teamgroup @ DDR4-5000 CL18 with ASRock X570 AQUA rclxms.gif


owikh84
post Aug 15 2019, 11:09 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(Joseph Hahn @ Aug 15 2019, 09:38 PM)
Hi guys. I tried tightening my RAM timing using the DRAM calculator and it seems to work. 3200 from CL16 to CL14 and all those other timings. Tried testing the RAM and no error. But if i try to on the PC (cold boot) it won't start and after a few resets, it will just revert the RAM to 2400. Any idea why?
*

RAM issue with cold booting, doubt that your RAM OC is stable.
With what software did you test the stability of your RAM OC?
Mind to share any screenshot of the run?
Perhaps you need to play more with memory settings such as disabling GearDown, adjusting procODT etc.

QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Aug 15 2019, 10:16 PM)
isnt that board like RM4k+
*
ASRock X570 AQUA - RM 4150 sweat.gif

This post has been edited by owikh84: Aug 15 2019, 11:21 PM
owikh84
post Aug 20 2019, 02:00 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(hypermax @ Aug 19 2019, 11:44 PM)
I have just built a rig with Ryzen 5 3600 with B450 Strix-F. On latest bios 2605 (Aegesa 1003 ab). All core boost clock (PBO + auto overclocking) is only 3950Mhz during CPU-Z stress test and Aida64 stability test. single core boost also never goes beyond 4100Mhz. However i can manual overclock to all core boost clock of 4200MHz with voltage of 1.4V, Aida64 stable for 30min.

I am using 360mm AIO and my CPU temp is good. Max load while on PBO + auto overclocking was only 72C. Hence the PBO is definitely not limited by the temp.

Any sifu here can confirm whether PBO is broken for B450 chipset with latest microcode?
*
From reddit it seems PBO is still broken on ASUS B450.
Not sure if other vendors managed to fix it or not though.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/chfl3...ing_ryzen_3000/

Btw, curious how come some users managed to get PBO worked?!
QUOTE
The PBO + Auto OC definitely works well with my 3600. I'm now hitting an all core boost between 4.25GHz and 4.3GHz during gaming and a single core boost of 4.4GHz. Before enabling PBO + Auto OC i was capped at 4.1GHz.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/cdabj...wk_pbo_testing/

This post has been edited by owikh84: Aug 20 2019, 07:54 PM
owikh84
post Sep 1 2019, 06:38 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(nrw @ Sep 1 2019, 02:44 AM)
one stable light overclock on my small ryzen system then  blush.gif

3600 @4.125Ghz, 1.344V (no lcc so its @1.31 after vdroop)
B450 Tomahawk
2x16GB E-Die 1:1 FCLK, 3800, 16-19-16-38

solid cpu but far from outstanding. maxes out at 4.225 @1.39 with llc. I like my system silent and more efficient however.

E-dies as expected, tRCDRD and tRFC (a bit) higher than what one would see using B-dies. other than that it's on par with 'regular' binned B-dies.
*
Karhu 10000% passed at 3800 16-19-16-38-56?
Mind sharing your ss?
owikh84
post Sep 9 2019, 10:03 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(nrw @ Sep 9 2019, 07:34 PM)
Samsung started selling a-dies ddr4 32gb today. 10nm, 16GBit/chip, rated 2933 cl21. Doubt they will be any good for OC but we shall see.
*
B-die is 2666 CL19, pretty much the same true latency but less bandwidth.

2666 CL19: 2000/2666*19 = 14.25ns
2933 CL21: 2000/2933*21 = 14.32ns

Ya, curious about A-die's OCbility vs B-die.
We gonna wait and see later... biggrin.gif


owikh84
post Sep 9 2019, 11:51 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



Holiday benching with 3600X + C8H that I recently purchased from shopee at a good deal biggrin.gif

user posted image

Starting off with CPU OC, so far I've tested 3 types of coolers at 4.2GHz OC @ 1.375v on all cores.
Thermal results based on Prime95 v29.8 b6 custom blend 1344K min/max for 30mins as follows:
Cooler Min (°C) Max (°C)
AMD Wraith Spire 50.0 92.3
Raijintek Orcus 240mm 47.1 79.8
Custom WC 40.5 74.4

Max OC under 1.40v should be 4.25GHz, thermal results under custom WC as below:
CPU Clock Min (°C) Max (°C)
Stock @ 4.1-4.125GHz @ 1.28v 39.6 66.6
4.2GHz @ 1.375v* 40.5 74.4
4.25GHz @ 1.375v 40.3 76.3
* Can still be reduced a bit

Some benchmarks at 4.25GHz OC:

Cinebench R15:
user posted image

Cinebench R20:
user posted image

Hexacore CPU comparisons:
CPU CB R15 MT CB R15 ST CB R20 MT CB R20 ST
3600X @ 4.25GHz 1695 199 3866 490
8700K @ 5.00GHz 1650 217 3962 517

4.3GHz is bootable but sometimes CB R20 crashed at 1.425v so I think more juices is required to get it stable.
Will revisit this later and update in this thread...
owikh84
post Sep 10 2019, 12:43 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



Continuing with RAM OC, so far hasn't been so impressive mainly due to high latency issue.
It could be that the latest DRAM Calculator v1.6.2 by 1usmus has decided to set the subtimings too loose that eventually hitting the RAM performance. Maybe need further tweaking to optimize the bandwidths and latency.

RAM OC with SK-Hynix AFR:

3466 16-19-19-40-1T @ 1.41v:
user posted image

3533 16-19-19-40-1T @ 1.45v (not stable):
user posted image

RAM OC with Samsung B-die:

user posted image

3600 14-15-15-30-1T @ 1.45v:
user posted image

3800 16-17-16-32-1T @ 1.41v:
user posted image

4000 16-17-16-32-1T @ 1.45v:
user posted image

4133 16-17-16-32-1T @ 1.45v:
user posted image

Again, still need to figure out how to reduce improve the efficiency.
Aim for 3800 CL14 stable but I don't think possible with the current ADATA D80 sticks.
Later I swap to my TridentZ RGB 4266 kit and see how much I can push. notworthy.gif

owikh84
post Sep 10 2019, 11:48 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(nrw @ Sep 10 2019, 10:44 AM)
Gj, looking at your latency I am fairly sure your power down mode is enabled.
*
I need to recheck this later as the GDM and PDM are mixes of enabled and disabled as per recommendation by DRAM Calculator.

Edit: Okay I just rechecked and found that my Power Down Mode has been disabled right from 3466 all the way up to 4133. So, the source of high latency could be from other settings.

This post has been edited by owikh84: Sep 10 2019, 09:59 PM
owikh84
post Sep 14 2019, 12:13 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



3600X 4.3GHz @ 1.45v, I think I'm pretty much hitting the ceiling already. Yes, note the voltage is exponentially increased. Thermal results based around P95 28.9 b6 custom blend 1344K min/max FFT for 30mins:

CPU Clock Min (°C) Max (°C)
Stock @ 4.1-4.125GHz @ 1.28v 39.6 66.6
4.2GHz @ 1.375v* 40.5 74.4
4.25GHz @ 1.375v 40.3 76.3
4.30GHz @ 1.450v 40.0 82.6

* Can still be reduced a bit

user posted image

Cinebench benchmark scores also improved a bit:
CPU CB R15 MT CB R15 ST CB R20 MT CB R20 ST
3600X @ 4.30GHz 1715 201 3893 493
3600X @ 4.25GHz 1695 199 3866 490
8700K @ 5.00GHz 1650 217 3962 517

CB R15:
user posted image

CB R20:
user posted image
owikh84
post Sep 14 2019, 12:57 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



Latest AGESA 1.0.0.3 ABBA seems to have fixed my 3600X's boost bug that I had earlier, now I can see one core is boosting up to 4.4GHz as per AMD's original specs. CB R20 runs with everything default:

BIOS 0803:
user posted image

BIOS 1001:
user posted image
owikh84
post Sep 14 2019, 10:19 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(nrw @ Sep 14 2019, 08:09 PM)
What you haven't pointed out from your results is that (unfortunately in hwinfo64 the polling period is not visible) voltages under load and hence temperatures dropped for stock settings.
*

Voltage is set by ASUS BIOS so nothing to do with AGESA, temperature is stock cooler vs custom loop LOL.

owikh84
post Sep 15 2019, 08:29 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(nrw @ Sep 14 2019, 10:58 PM)
then the testing method is quite off  blink.gif  as thermal throttling starts in low to mid 70s already.
and ofc the smu in your new agesa controls voltage  blush.gif
why you think its called system management unit?
with its sensory sampling its controlling circuits on the chip. that includes voltage level, voltage supply to psms, thermal management, c-s boost.
*

Good point, but I was referring to the load voltage behavior being controlled by BIOS LLC settings. smile.gif

BTW, I'm still having high memory latency (70ns+) and low bandwidth (50k+ MB/s) seen in AIDA64 benchmark.
Tried everything such as reducing tRFC down to 160ns, PDM/GHM on/off, tRC 42-44, tFAW 16-20, new ABBA BIOS etc none of them seems to solve the issue. sad.gif
owikh84
post Sep 21 2019, 09:44 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Sep 20 2019, 09:50 PM)
slowly burnin d ram...  laugh.gif
*

Well done on the 2000% HCl. thumbup.gif
How's your AIDA64 benchmark score look like?
Good to see MemTweakIt is working on a none-ASUS board as well.

BTW, did you notice that HWMonitor is giving you vCore up to 2v max?
I'd suggest try to avoid using this software, or it could be that the GIGA boards are still using iTE Super I/O chip, which reads voltages not as accurate as the Nuvoton chip.


This post has been edited by owikh84: Sep 22 2019, 09:22 AM
owikh84
post Sep 22 2019, 11:43 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



3800 14-16-14-28-1T @ 1.480v

user posted image
owikh84
post Sep 28 2019, 10:06 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Sep 23 2019, 04:55 PM)
with HCI still runnin, & not on 1:1, it is possible guys...  smile.gif
*

Bingo, not being able to do FCLK 1900 at DDR4-3800 with my 3600X chip has seriously killed my latency and bandwidths. There's a 10ns penalty for 3800/FCLK 1866. At 3733/1866 (1:1) I could get sub 70ns and better bw.

I also came across an article from an ex-ROG staff doing comparisons of memory performance on 3600X/1xCCD vs 3900X/2xCCD: https://elmorlabs.com/index.php/2019-07-10/...0-investigated/

We can see significant differences in terms of mem bandwidths with 3900X over 3600X.
It is also suspected that dual-rank and 4x8GB DIMMs are capable of delivering higher bw.





owikh84
post Sep 28 2019, 11:31 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(nrw @ Sep 28 2019, 11:04 AM)
you can't boot or can't get stable with 1900 if? tried adjusting vddg/soc?
u'd kind of expect a better i/o die in an 3600x
*
Cant post at all, stuck at debug code 07 displayed on mobo.
I've tried playing around with VDDG up to 1.1v, SOC up to 1.15v but none of them seems to be helpful.
I also tried BCLK 102 with FCLK 1866, getting the same error code.

My BIOS settings as follow:
user posted image

This post has been edited by owikh84: Sep 28 2019, 11:40 AM
owikh84
post Sep 28 2019, 12:23 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(nrw @ Sep 28 2019, 11:52 AM)
Ok 1.1 vddg pretty high already, no luck with your IF then.
Is your bw really going up when you run 3733 synced? I used to think theres just a latency penalty.
*

ya I think 1.1v is quite high already, I even tried 1.2v SOC just now.
Not really want to go higher otherwise I will kill the IMC, I think I'm just one of those unlucky ones with FCLK capped at 1866.

3733 14-16-14-28, FCLK 1866:
user posted image

3800 14-16-14-28, FCLK 1866:
user posted image

This post has been edited by owikh84: Sep 28 2019, 12:24 PM

6 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0461sec    0.31    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 02:56 PM