QUOTE(hazairi @ Aug 11 2018, 01:49 PM)
Try to look back at the whatsapp conversation:
Me: Should be no issue on compatibility right?
You: Usually NO, oem is the brand, it's not Kingston.
When you answered 'Usually NO', from my perspective it means no compatibility issue.
Anyway, that conversation is nothing. The main point here is:
Let's not continue with the blaming game. Let's just negotiate on how to solve this. Last time I called you, you said it's not your problem and when I said I will complaint, you said go ahead. Thus, the reason I'm here.
I know you're an active seller and I also sometimes do trading here in LYN. I'm not here to kacau your 'periuk nasi' but just to get your attention. Just read the quotes from the forumers above.
And this quote says it all:
I pre-apologize first for my later aggressive tone that will be in this reply.
Firstly, lets see what you written in your first paragraph title
QUOTE
the seller already CONFIRM it's a Kingston compatibility product.
May I know since when I confirm it is a Kingston compatibility product? Can you please don't make story up? I already uploaded the Whatsapp chat to prove to everyone that you are lying about that.
And about this
QUOTE
When you answered 'Usually NO', from my perspective it means no compatibility issue.
Usually no means usually no, thats it. How can it become something else? Your perspective is your assumption, did I confirm to you it is a Kingston compability product? If not why did you frame me and accuse me for it? Your first paragraph you wrote the seller already CONFIRM it's a Kingston"compatibility product.
Besides that, you only ask that right after you made your payment, and at that moment I can only say usually no to you because you don't even provide any kind of info example your motherboard model and brand for me.
Care to explain your accusation? May I know why do you try to change the story up into the buyer confirm to you its a Kingston compability product?
Making it look like u got scammed into buying it when it is not? And also may I know why did u never ask for any kind of info before making payment? May I also know why did u rush into the payment? It is not seller's fault here you realize that the seller assume you should understand the minute u made ur payment means u understood the item that u r getting and terms and warranty period right? Can you not read my signature terms that I dont do refund?
And I also want to point it out that that time when you called me, I listened to your complaint and i have never tried to blame you, but u wrote it in the paragraph stating the buyer blame u and dun care about it? I talked and listened to you in the phone for a long duration and kept telling you that there will be no refund, you were the one that threaten me that you will report me if I don't give any refund, then I can only say if you wanna report please go ahead, because I have clearly stated in my signature no refund already. And I also told u that the item is in your hand I even apologize and gave u a solution that u can still sell it. And also kept informing you multiple times the item has a warranty and u can always come for an exchange from me. May I know why did u missed out all these information when you wrote it on this thread about our phone call?
Look, I am going to say that if I ever told u it is a Kingston compability product, I will already gladly refunded you without any question. But the thing is I have never said that, please do not change the entire story just to make it looks like seller's fault (I even uploaded the Whatsapp chat to prove it). And also please admit you made the payment already and understood the terms and all the copy paste that I gave it to you before u even ask for any kind of INFO or picture. You are framing me for stuff I have never done despite i already submited the Whatsapp screenshot, care to explain all of it?
For me it looks like buyer's fault here and buyer insist a refund where the seller refuse the refund because the seller already stated no refund and then the buyer went and report the seller for no refund, by making false claim for the story such as "Seller told me it is kingston compability product!" when the seller did not make any such claim, and also changing the word "Usually no" into "its 100% compatible" where both are entirely different meaning. And also asking for a refund when the refund terms is written clearly that only when no stock, refund will be given back.
Hopefully you can give me an explanation about your accusation of this dispute thread first paragraph claim where "The seller confirm it is a Kingston compability product" and clear that up, you are at this very moment accusing me of stuff i never done.
This post has been edited by aKiSuSu: Aug 12 2018, 02:48 AM