Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 1.1.1.1 or 8.8.8.8, Which is faster?

views
     
Doraku
post Jul 25 2018, 07:05 PM

Old threads digger
******
Senior Member
1,155 posts

Joined: Apr 2016


QUOTE(HMMaster @ Jul 25 2018, 04:16 PM)
actually, is it really notice-able? i mean, the difference is just milliseconds.
*
nope it probably just a placebo for those who say it faster than google DNS
SUSmrlive005
post Jul 25 2018, 10:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
114 posts

Joined: Nov 2013
I use both, cloudflare 1.1.1.1/back up 1.0.0.1 for streaming 4k at youtube or any other sites, its load 10x time faster than normal or google dns.

but cloudflare doesnt unblock every websites
wyh
post Jul 26 2018, 12:25 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,447 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
1.1.1.1 might have some websites inaccessible , therefore i dropped 1.1.1.1 and revert to 8.8.8.8
I<3LYN
post Jul 26 2018, 01:38 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
614 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


resolving with 1.1.1.1 is noticeably slower for me perhaps don't have any regional servers yet.

This post has been edited by I<3LYN: Jul 26 2018, 01:38 AM
System Error Message
post Jul 26 2018, 05:31 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,781 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
put everything in, so when the faster DNS cant resolve, the slower google one does.
TSSkylinestar
post Oct 19 2018, 05:48 PM

Mega Duck
********
All Stars
10,477 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak
How is it today? Which is still better?
war3boy
post Oct 20 2018, 09:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
I'm using 1.1.1.1 for several months and didn't notice any different actually with Google.
Attached Image
But i go to 1.1.1.1 cause of Privacy. tongue.gif

Between share something about the OpenDNS, which actually acquired by Cisco under Umbrella Service.
Provide 1st Tier of DNS filtering. Somesort of Website protection from Cisco.
But you will feel the latency more higher than Google / Cloudfare , and most probably little slow of user experience.
And return is more safety browsing? brows.gif

This post has been edited by war3boy: Oct 20 2018, 09:55 AM
TSSkylinestar
post Oct 20 2018, 11:28 AM

Mega Duck
********
All Stars
10,477 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak
QUOTE(war3boy @ Oct 20 2018, 09:50 AM)
I'm using 1.1.1.1 for several months and didn't notice any different actually with Google.
Attached Image
But i go to 1.1.1.1 cause of Privacy.  tongue.gif

Between share something about the OpenDNS, which actually acquired by Cisco under Umbrella Service.
Provide 1st Tier of DNS filtering. Somesort of Website protection from Cisco.
But you will feel the latency more higher than Google / Cloudfare , and most probably little slow of user experience.
And return is more safety browsing?   brows.gif
*
Wow. Good speed you got there.
Here's my crappy speed from celcom:

Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=56
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=56
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 1.1.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 32ms

***

Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=118
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=118
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=118
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=118

Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 33ms

This post has been edited by Skylinestar: Oct 20 2018, 11:28 AM
war3boy
post Oct 20 2018, 11:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Oct 20 2018, 11:28 AM)
Wow. Good speed you got there.
Here's my crappy speed from celcom:

Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=56
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=56
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 1.1.1.1:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 32ms

***

Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=118
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=118
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=118
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=118

Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 33ms
*
You're using mobile line. That why the latency unstable.
I'm using fixed line. That why it is good speed and stable. brows.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0212sec    0.82    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 01:10 AM