QUOTE(HMMaster @ Jul 25 2018, 04:16 PM)
nope it probably just a placebo for those who say it faster than google DNS1.1.1.1 or 8.8.8.8, Which is faster?
1.1.1.1 or 8.8.8.8, Which is faster?
|
|
Jul 25 2018, 07:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,155 posts Joined: Apr 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 25 2018, 10:14 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
114 posts Joined: Nov 2013 |
I use both, cloudflare 1.1.1.1/back up 1.0.0.1 for streaming 4k at youtube or any other sites, its load 10x time faster than normal or google dns.
but cloudflare doesnt unblock every websites |
|
|
Jul 26 2018, 12:25 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,447 posts Joined: Jan 2008 |
1.1.1.1 might have some websites inaccessible , therefore i dropped 1.1.1.1 and revert to 8.8.8.8
|
|
|
Jul 26 2018, 01:38 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
614 posts Joined: Sep 2009 |
resolving with 1.1.1.1 is noticeably slower for me perhaps don't have any regional servers yet.
This post has been edited by I<3LYN: Jul 26 2018, 01:38 AM |
|
|
Jul 26 2018, 05:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,781 posts Joined: Jul 2010 |
put everything in, so when the faster DNS cant resolve, the slower google one does.
|
|
|
Oct 19 2018, 05:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,477 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sarawak |
How is it today? Which is still better?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2018, 09:50 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
269 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
I'm using 1.1.1.1 for several months and didn't notice any different actually with Google.
But i go to 1.1.1.1 cause of Privacy. Between share something about the OpenDNS, which actually acquired by Cisco under Umbrella Service. Provide 1st Tier of DNS filtering. Somesort of Website protection from Cisco. But you will feel the latency more higher than Google / Cloudfare , and most probably little slow of user experience. And return is more safety browsing? This post has been edited by war3boy: Oct 20 2018, 09:55 AM |
|
|
Oct 20 2018, 11:28 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,477 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sarawak |
QUOTE(war3boy @ Oct 20 2018, 09:50 AM) I'm using 1.1.1.1 for several months and didn't notice any different actually with Google. Wow. Good speed you got there.But i go to 1.1.1.1 cause of Privacy. Between share something about the OpenDNS, which actually acquired by Cisco under Umbrella Service. Provide 1st Tier of DNS filtering. Somesort of Website protection from Cisco. But you will feel the latency more higher than Google / Cloudfare , and most probably little slow of user experience. And return is more safety browsing? Here's my crappy speed from celcom: Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56 Ping statistics for 1.1.1.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 32ms *** Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=118 Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 33ms This post has been edited by Skylinestar: Oct 20 2018, 11:28 AM |
|
|
Oct 20 2018, 11:44 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
269 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Oct 20 2018, 11:28 AM) Wow. Good speed you got there. You're using mobile line. That why the latency unstable.Here's my crappy speed from celcom: Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56 Ping statistics for 1.1.1.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 32ms *** Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=118 Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 33ms I'm using fixed line. That why it is good speed and stable. |
| Change to: | 0.0212sec
0.82
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 01:10 AM |