1.1.1.1 or 8.8.8.8, Which is faster?
|
|
 Oct 20 2018, 09:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
269 posts Joined: Aug 2011 
|
I'm using 1.1.1.1 for several months and didn't notice any different actually with Google.
But i go to 1.1.1.1 cause of Privacy.  Between share something about the OpenDNS, which actually acquired by Cisco under Umbrella Service. Provide 1st Tier of DNS filtering. Somesort of Website protection from Cisco. But you will feel the latency more higher than Google / Cloudfare , and most probably little slow of user experience. And return is more safety browsing?  This post has been edited by war3boy: Oct 20 2018, 09:55 AM |
|
|
Oct 20 2018, 11:44 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
269 posts Joined: Aug 2011
|
QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Oct 20 2018, 11:28 AM) Wow. Good speed you got there. You're using mobile line. That why the latency unstable.Here's my crappy speed from celcom: Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56 Ping statistics for 1.1.1.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 32ms *** Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=118 Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 33ms  I'm using fixed line. That why it is good speed and stable. |
| Change to: |  0.0163sec
 0.80
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 11:26 PM |
Quote