Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 1.1.1.1 or 8.8.8.8, Which is faster?

views
     
TSSkylinestar
post Jul 20 2018, 08:55 PM, updated 8y ago

Mega Duck
********
All Stars
10,477 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak
It's been several months cloudfare release 1.1.1.1.
After using it several months, I feel that it's getting slower. Is it just me? hmm.gif
Which do you prefer? google 8.8.8.8 dns or cloudfare 1.1.1.1 dns?

This post has been edited by Skylinestar: Jul 20 2018, 09:22 PM
prokiller1199
post Jul 20 2018, 08:58 PM

Hi there.
*****
Senior Member
966 posts

Joined: Apr 2016


QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Jul 20 2018, 08:55 PM)
It's been several months cloudfare release 1.1.1.1.
After using it several months, I feel that it's getting slower. Is it just me?  hmm.gif
Which do you prefer? google 8.8.8.8 dns or cloudfare 1.1.1.1 dns?
*
i'm always using 8.8.8.8 and ipv6 one, because cloudfare doesnot unlock sites. you know what i mean.... brows.gif
moiskyrie
post Jul 20 2018, 09:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,217 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: City of Neko~~Nyaa~
I use cloudflare and it unlock prawn site...
That why i still use it...
prokiller1199
post Jul 20 2018, 09:16 PM

Hi there.
*****
Senior Member
966 posts

Joined: Apr 2016


QUOTE(moiskyrie @ Jul 20 2018, 09:14 PM)
I use cloudflare and it unlock prawn site...
That why i still use it...
*
is it my prawn sites shows me blue shit mcmc
wilson1stop
post Jul 20 2018, 09:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,779 posts

Joined: Feb 2008


QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Jul 20 2018, 09:55 PM)
It's been several months cloudfare release 1.1.1.1.
After using it several months, I feel that it's getting slower. Is it just me?  hmm.gif
Which do you prefer? google 8.8.8.8 dns or cloudfare 1.1.1.1 dns?
*
It's depend to your surfing behaviors...
1.1.1.1 is faster to get response from DNS hence it'll faster loaded websites but subjects to those hosted in APNIC regionals.

So if you more using USA sites, then 8.8.4.4 is still faster than 8.8.8.8

But for me, I'll using 1.9.1.9 and 1.1.1.1 after tested with JumperDNS.
rhytion
post Jul 20 2018, 09:35 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
389 posts

Joined: Oct 2016
From: Kota Kinabalu


My own DNS hosted on raspberry pi faster
hurricane21
post Jul 20 2018, 09:53 PM

Senior Probation
******
Senior Member
1,389 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Southern Region


Being using OpenDNS for 5 years.
miloaisdino
post Jul 20 2018, 09:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,418 posts

Joined: Jul 2015
Just do a ping test lol.
SilentVampire
post Jul 20 2018, 10:05 PM

Networking Enthusiast
*******
Senior Member
5,714 posts

Joined: Mar 2007



QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Jul 20 2018, 08:55 PM)
It's been several months cloudfare release 1.1.1.1.
After using it several months, I feel that it's getting slower. Is it just me?  hmm.gif
Which do you prefer? google 8.8.8.8 dns or cloudfare 1.1.1.1 dns?
*
There have been a few teething issues with 1.1.1.1, and it is not entirely Cloudflare's fault as that particular IP address have been used as a private IP address, when it shouldn't be, and for a whole various other stuff as well, by other networking vendors and companies that should have known better. See here: https://blog.cloudflare.com/fixing-reachabi...1-1-1-globally/

For now, it is better to use Google 8.8.8.8, but I personally used OpenDNS and have not had any problems so far.
AVFAN
post Jul 20 2018, 10:08 PM

20k VIP Club
*********
All Stars
24,468 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
1111 was good at the beginning.

i hv returned to 8888, more stable, more reliable.

soonwai
post Jul 20 2018, 10:41 PM


********
All Stars
11,459 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: KL


Use your router. That'll always be the fastest since it's physically closer. Most routers cache DNS requests. The first will come from the internet and thereafter from the router.

I haven't use 1.1.1.1 yet. Currently using Google and Opendns in my router.

or this:
QUOTE(rhytion @ Jul 20 2018, 09:35 PM)
My own DNS hosted on raspberry pi faster
*
MelancholicAnubis
post Jul 23 2018, 02:54 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Mar 2017
From: Somewhere :3


I been having issues with Cloudflare or sometimes Google DNS, mostly just connectivity issues for them off and on to sites like Facebook and Instagram, like pictures won't load, or it takes a long time

But when I switch to OpenDNS, everything back to normal, which I found weird..
davinlicious
post Jul 24 2018, 05:59 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
From: liverpool



i go for 8.8.8.8

open space smile.gif
Doraku
post Jul 24 2018, 11:26 PM

Old threads digger
******
Senior Member
1,155 posts

Joined: Apr 2016


QUOTE(prokiller1199 @ Jul 20 2018, 08:58 PM)
i'm always using 8.8.8.8 and ipv6 one, because cloudfare doesnot unlock sites. you know what i mean.... brows.gif
*
Does google IPv6 DNS better than Automaticaly obtained one?.

QUOTE(miloaisdino @ Jul 20 2018, 09:58 PM)
Just do a ping test lol.
*
Done,Based on this picture Cloudfare AVG latency is 1ms+ higher than Google DNS,but have a lower Peak latency.
Meanwhile Google DNS AVG Letency is 1ms lower and more consistent,but have a higher peak latency
Attached Image

QUOTE(AVFAN @ Jul 20 2018, 10:08 PM)
1111 was good at the beginning.

i hv returned to 8888, more stable, more reliable.
*
agree lol
prokiller1199
post Jul 24 2018, 11:47 PM

Hi there.
*****
Senior Member
966 posts

Joined: Apr 2016


QUOTE(Doraku @ Jul 24 2018, 11:26 PM)
Does google IPv6 DNS better than Automaticaly obtained one?.
Done,Based on this picture Cloudfare AVG latency is 1ms+ higher than Google DNS,but have a lower Peak latency.
Meanwhile Google DNS AVG Letency is 1ms lower and more consistent,but have a higher peak latency
Attached Image
agree lol
*
automatically obtained one is from TM = not good
I'm also go back to Google dns after tried cloudfare ones
Moogle Stiltzkin
post Jul 25 2018, 03:14 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,474 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
bruce.gif

This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Jun 13 2021, 06:54 AM
wilson1stop
post Jul 25 2018, 01:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,779 posts

Joined: Feb 2008


That's weird, my's TM DNS always faster than Cloudflare and Google, while I'm staying far away from Cyberjaya still able get 4ms rclxms.gif
Attached Image
System Error Message
post Jul 25 2018, 03:13 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,781 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
use both. Cyberjaya actually far from the main backbones of the internet.

run the DNS benchmark, between cloudfare and google DNS, put the faster one first.
On my router i can have many DNS servers, heres how i decide mine.
First 2 DNS servers are openDNS (i use some settings).
Then the next 4 DNS are both google and cloudfare.
I Use the DNS benchmark to sort which IPs go first between openDNS 2 entries and the next 4 entries.

TM seems to have improved their infra but they still only have 1 PPPOE gateway per large area and that will be the main cause of problems for them. ISPs with multiple PPPOE gateways per area will have less issues because if you have a router like mikrotik you can connect to multiple simultaneously and it will use the faster one automatically, and for normal users, their routers will connect to whichever gateway responds the fastest. Very few ISPs around the world actually implement this and it requires no special config, only for more gateways to be available on the layer 2 network.
HMMaster
post Jul 25 2018, 04:16 PM

10K Club
Group Icon
Moderator
10,308 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


actually, is it really notice-able? i mean, the difference is just milliseconds.
wilson1stop
post Jul 25 2018, 04:56 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,779 posts

Joined: Feb 2008


QUOTE(HMMaster @ Jul 25 2018, 05:16 PM)
actually, is it really notice-able? i mean, the difference is just milliseconds.
*
yup, normally you wouldn't notice it.
but it'll decide good routes or poor routes to access the websites... eg some will bring you to HK/JP then come back MY/SG sites.
Doraku
post Jul 25 2018, 07:05 PM

Old threads digger
******
Senior Member
1,155 posts

Joined: Apr 2016


QUOTE(HMMaster @ Jul 25 2018, 04:16 PM)
actually, is it really notice-able? i mean, the difference is just milliseconds.
*
nope it probably just a placebo for those who say it faster than google DNS
SUSmrlive005
post Jul 25 2018, 10:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
114 posts

Joined: Nov 2013
I use both, cloudflare 1.1.1.1/back up 1.0.0.1 for streaming 4k at youtube or any other sites, its load 10x time faster than normal or google dns.

but cloudflare doesnt unblock every websites
wyh
post Jul 26 2018, 12:25 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,447 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
1.1.1.1 might have some websites inaccessible , therefore i dropped 1.1.1.1 and revert to 8.8.8.8
I<3LYN
post Jul 26 2018, 01:38 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
614 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


resolving with 1.1.1.1 is noticeably slower for me perhaps don't have any regional servers yet.

This post has been edited by I<3LYN: Jul 26 2018, 01:38 AM
System Error Message
post Jul 26 2018, 05:31 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,781 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
put everything in, so when the faster DNS cant resolve, the slower google one does.
TSSkylinestar
post Oct 19 2018, 05:48 PM

Mega Duck
********
All Stars
10,477 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak
How is it today? Which is still better?
war3boy
post Oct 20 2018, 09:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
I'm using 1.1.1.1 for several months and didn't notice any different actually with Google.
Attached Image
But i go to 1.1.1.1 cause of Privacy. tongue.gif

Between share something about the OpenDNS, which actually acquired by Cisco under Umbrella Service.
Provide 1st Tier of DNS filtering. Somesort of Website protection from Cisco.
But you will feel the latency more higher than Google / Cloudfare , and most probably little slow of user experience.
And return is more safety browsing? brows.gif

This post has been edited by war3boy: Oct 20 2018, 09:55 AM
TSSkylinestar
post Oct 20 2018, 11:28 AM

Mega Duck
********
All Stars
10,477 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak
QUOTE(war3boy @ Oct 20 2018, 09:50 AM)
I'm using 1.1.1.1 for several months and didn't notice any different actually with Google.
Attached Image
But i go to 1.1.1.1 cause of Privacy.  tongue.gif

Between share something about the OpenDNS, which actually acquired by Cisco under Umbrella Service.
Provide 1st Tier of DNS filtering. Somesort of Website protection from Cisco.
But you will feel the latency more higher than Google / Cloudfare , and most probably little slow of user experience.
And return is more safety browsing?   brows.gif
*
Wow. Good speed you got there.
Here's my crappy speed from celcom:

Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=56
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=56
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 1.1.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 32ms

***

Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=118
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=118
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=118
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=118

Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 33ms

This post has been edited by Skylinestar: Oct 20 2018, 11:28 AM
war3boy
post Oct 20 2018, 11:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Oct 20 2018, 11:28 AM)
Wow. Good speed you got there.
Here's my crappy speed from celcom:

Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=56
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=56
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 1.1.1.1:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 32ms

***

Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=118
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=118
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=118
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=118

Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 33ms
*
You're using mobile line. That why the latency unstable.
I'm using fixed line. That why it is good speed and stable. brows.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0275sec    0.66    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 01:25 PM