After using it several months, I feel that it's getting slower. Is it just me?
Which do you prefer? google 8.8.8.8 dns or cloudfare 1.1.1.1 dns?
This post has been edited by Skylinestar: Jul 20 2018, 09:22 PM
1.1.1.1 or 8.8.8.8, Which is faster?
|
|
Jul 20 2018, 08:55 PM, updated 8y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,477 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sarawak |
It's been several months cloudfare release 1.1.1.1.
After using it several months, I feel that it's getting slower. Is it just me? Which do you prefer? google 8.8.8.8 dns or cloudfare 1.1.1.1 dns? This post has been edited by Skylinestar: Jul 20 2018, 09:22 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 20 2018, 08:58 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
966 posts Joined: Apr 2016 |
QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Jul 20 2018, 08:55 PM) It's been several months cloudfare release 1.1.1.1. i'm always using 8.8.8.8 and ipv6 one, because cloudfare doesnot unlock sites. you know what i mean.... After using it several months, I feel that it's getting slower. Is it just me? Which do you prefer? google 8.8.8.8 dns or cloudfare 1.1.1.1 dns? |
|
|
Jul 20 2018, 09:14 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,217 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: City of Neko~~Nyaa~ |
I use cloudflare and it unlock prawn site...
That why i still use it... |
|
|
Jul 20 2018, 09:16 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
966 posts Joined: Apr 2016 |
|
|
|
Jul 20 2018, 09:28 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,779 posts Joined: Feb 2008 |
QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Jul 20 2018, 09:55 PM) It's been several months cloudfare release 1.1.1.1. It's depend to your surfing behaviors...After using it several months, I feel that it's getting slower. Is it just me? Which do you prefer? google 8.8.8.8 dns or cloudfare 1.1.1.1 dns? 1.1.1.1 is faster to get response from DNS hence it'll faster loaded websites but subjects to those hosted in APNIC regionals. So if you more using USA sites, then 8.8.4.4 is still faster than 8.8.8.8 But for me, I'll using 1.9.1.9 and 1.1.1.1 after tested with JumperDNS. |
|
|
Jul 20 2018, 09:35 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
389 posts Joined: Oct 2016 From: Kota Kinabalu |
My own DNS hosted on raspberry pi faster
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 20 2018, 09:53 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,389 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Southern Region |
Being using OpenDNS for 5 years.
|
|
|
Jul 20 2018, 09:58 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,418 posts Joined: Jul 2015 |
Just do a ping test lol.
|
|
|
Jul 20 2018, 10:05 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,714 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Jul 20 2018, 08:55 PM) It's been several months cloudfare release 1.1.1.1. There have been a few teething issues with 1.1.1.1, and it is not entirely Cloudflare's fault as that particular IP address have been used as a private IP address, when it shouldn't be, and for a whole various other stuff as well, by other networking vendors and companies that should have known better. See here: https://blog.cloudflare.com/fixing-reachabi...1-1-1-globally/After using it several months, I feel that it's getting slower. Is it just me? Which do you prefer? google 8.8.8.8 dns or cloudfare 1.1.1.1 dns? For now, it is better to use Google 8.8.8.8, but I personally used OpenDNS and have not had any problems so far. |
|
|
Jul 20 2018, 10:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,468 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
1111 was good at the beginning.
i hv returned to 8888, more stable, more reliable. |
|
|
Jul 20 2018, 10:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,459 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: KL |
Use your router. That'll always be the fastest since it's physically closer. Most routers cache DNS requests. The first will come from the internet and thereafter from the router.
I haven't use 1.1.1.1 yet. Currently using Google and Opendns in my router. or this: QUOTE(rhytion @ Jul 20 2018, 09:35 PM) |
|
|
Jul 23 2018, 02:54 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Mar 2017 From: Somewhere :3 |
I been having issues with Cloudflare or sometimes Google DNS, mostly just connectivity issues for them off and on to sites like Facebook and Instagram, like pictures won't load, or it takes a long time
But when I switch to OpenDNS, everything back to normal, which I found weird.. |
|
|
Jul 24 2018, 05:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
375 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: liverpool |
i go for 8.8.8.8
open space |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 24 2018, 11:26 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,155 posts Joined: Apr 2016 |
QUOTE(prokiller1199 @ Jul 20 2018, 08:58 PM) i'm always using 8.8.8.8 and ipv6 one, because cloudfare doesnot unlock sites. you know what i mean.... Does google IPv6 DNS better than Automaticaly obtained one?.QUOTE(miloaisdino @ Jul 20 2018, 09:58 PM) Done,Based on this picture Cloudfare AVG latency is 1ms+ higher than Google DNS,but have a lower Peak latency.Meanwhile Google DNS AVG Letency is 1ms lower and more consistent,but have a higher peak latency QUOTE(AVFAN @ Jul 20 2018, 10:08 PM) agree lol |
|
|
Jul 24 2018, 11:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
966 posts Joined: Apr 2016 |
QUOTE(Doraku @ Jul 24 2018, 11:26 PM) Does google IPv6 DNS better than Automaticaly obtained one?. automatically obtained one is from TM = not goodDone,Based on this picture Cloudfare AVG latency is 1ms+ higher than Google DNS,but have a lower Peak latency. Meanwhile Google DNS AVG Letency is 1ms lower and more consistent,but have a higher peak latency agree lol I'm also go back to Google dns after tried cloudfare ones |
|
|
Jul 25 2018, 03:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,474 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Jun 13 2021, 06:54 AM |
|
|
Jul 25 2018, 01:27 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,779 posts Joined: Feb 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 25 2018, 03:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,781 posts Joined: Jul 2010 |
use both. Cyberjaya actually far from the main backbones of the internet.
run the DNS benchmark, between cloudfare and google DNS, put the faster one first. On my router i can have many DNS servers, heres how i decide mine. First 2 DNS servers are openDNS (i use some settings). Then the next 4 DNS are both google and cloudfare. I Use the DNS benchmark to sort which IPs go first between openDNS 2 entries and the next 4 entries. TM seems to have improved their infra but they still only have 1 PPPOE gateway per large area and that will be the main cause of problems for them. ISPs with multiple PPPOE gateways per area will have less issues because if you have a router like mikrotik you can connect to multiple simultaneously and it will use the faster one automatically, and for normal users, their routers will connect to whichever gateway responds the fastest. Very few ISPs around the world actually implement this and it requires no special config, only for more gateways to be available on the layer 2 network. |
|
|
Jul 25 2018, 04:16 PM
|
|
Moderator
10,308 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
actually, is it really notice-able? i mean, the difference is just milliseconds.
|
|
|
Jul 25 2018, 04:56 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,779 posts Joined: Feb 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 25 2018, 07:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,155 posts Joined: Apr 2016 |
|
|
|
Jul 25 2018, 10:14 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
114 posts Joined: Nov 2013 |
I use both, cloudflare 1.1.1.1/back up 1.0.0.1 for streaming 4k at youtube or any other sites, its load 10x time faster than normal or google dns.
but cloudflare doesnt unblock every websites |
|
|
Jul 26 2018, 12:25 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,447 posts Joined: Jan 2008 |
1.1.1.1 might have some websites inaccessible , therefore i dropped 1.1.1.1 and revert to 8.8.8.8
|
|
|
Jul 26 2018, 01:38 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
614 posts Joined: Sep 2009 |
resolving with 1.1.1.1 is noticeably slower for me perhaps don't have any regional servers yet.
This post has been edited by I<3LYN: Jul 26 2018, 01:38 AM |
|
|
Jul 26 2018, 05:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,781 posts Joined: Jul 2010 |
put everything in, so when the faster DNS cant resolve, the slower google one does.
|
|
|
Oct 19 2018, 05:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,477 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sarawak |
How is it today? Which is still better?
|
|
|
Oct 20 2018, 09:50 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
269 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
I'm using 1.1.1.1 for several months and didn't notice any different actually with Google.
But i go to 1.1.1.1 cause of Privacy. Between share something about the OpenDNS, which actually acquired by Cisco under Umbrella Service. Provide 1st Tier of DNS filtering. Somesort of Website protection from Cisco. But you will feel the latency more higher than Google / Cloudfare , and most probably little slow of user experience. And return is more safety browsing? This post has been edited by war3boy: Oct 20 2018, 09:55 AM |
|
|
Oct 20 2018, 11:28 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,477 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sarawak |
QUOTE(war3boy @ Oct 20 2018, 09:50 AM) I'm using 1.1.1.1 for several months and didn't notice any different actually with Google. Wow. Good speed you got there.But i go to 1.1.1.1 cause of Privacy. Between share something about the OpenDNS, which actually acquired by Cisco under Umbrella Service. Provide 1st Tier of DNS filtering. Somesort of Website protection from Cisco. But you will feel the latency more higher than Google / Cloudfare , and most probably little slow of user experience. And return is more safety browsing? Here's my crappy speed from celcom: Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56 Ping statistics for 1.1.1.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 32ms *** Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=118 Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 33ms This post has been edited by Skylinestar: Oct 20 2018, 11:28 AM |
|
|
Oct 20 2018, 11:44 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
269 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Oct 20 2018, 11:28 AM) Wow. Good speed you got there. You're using mobile line. That why the latency unstable.Here's my crappy speed from celcom: Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=56 Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56 Ping statistics for 1.1.1.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 32ms *** Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=118 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=118 Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 33ms I'm using fixed line. That why it is good speed and stable. |
| Change to: | 0.0275sec
0.66
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 01:25 PM |