Before I create a strawman out this "sharing" and beat the crap out of it; may I know what's the objective of this sharing?

Rich men do comes with pretty good anti golddigger radar. Correct me if i'm wrong, u seemed found a way to get around it.
It's either u got around it or he has a broken radar.

But that's not the point. The point is, that doesn't change the fact that you are still gold digger u know that right?

The title should be "Golddigger's Guide to Effective True Gem Disguising to Con Rich Men".

P.S. That's pretty good title. Maybe u should write a book about it. And I will write "Men's Guide to Walkaway from a Bad Deal".

Like u do, I do understand where she comes from. But, I don't think it rationalizes some malpractice and the malicious intent.
Focus should be betterman by improvement via one's labour instead of deceit. E.g. The intent to read up on business times not to understand economic conditions and implications but to "pretend" interested in economics & business to chat some rich dude up. That's sick man.

I agree if I come up with a topic "Men's guide to get under women's pants with average penis" would be sick too and judged the same if it is"Men's guide to get under RICH women's pants with average penis and get them cumming for more".

Substantiate your allegation that I have I labelled you or labelled you wrongly. Else, you are the one personally attacking me. Apology not compulsory.

Those are not assumption. Those are in ur very own writing. From the title and the quotes below.

You hv a target/victim (rich men,HIM), you have your methods (bait the victim,HIM) and finally finishing of with the kill (the list of rewards of your kill, HIM).
You checked all that in your text.

How do you have the audacity to say you are not doing it for men? Maybe not all men, that you are right. But rich men (it's in the title by the way before you accuse me anything). ?

Try detached urself from ur writing and go through this list. Ask urself honestly how many redflags u checked.
https://www.wikihow.com/Spot-a-Gold-Digger

It's shallow and hollow. Shouldn't be encouraged.
Focus on betterman/woman is good. Banging rich tycoon is secondary. But it appears you got it the other way round and refused to admit it.

Melinda Gates story is inspiring. But for some reason, people are more interested in donating to Kylie Jenner.









This post has been edited by RUI: Jul 19 2018, 03:59 PM

Guys pick chicks with ideal waist to hip ratio is strongly relates with fertility.
That's for better next gen. Mostly don't do that. I do not disagree.

At least make it mutual. Hot chick bangs hot guys out of mutual lust and desire for one another is ok. But, I despise people who trades with good look and hot curves with material providence. I despise both the men and women in such transaction.

Girl pick guys who can foot expensive wedding bill and vacation.
That's for what exactly? What is that? What's there to be proud of or what's useful there? What's the point?

This post has been edited by RUI: Jul 19 2018, 05:08 PM

Yes. Some LOW LIFE do that all the time. But, guys do not rationalize it like you do and turn it as if a trophy worth fighting for.
We haven't have an idiot like that to come brag about his books "Men's Guide to RICH women's pants with average penis and keep her cumming for more". I already addressed that in first post. At least, that low life would quietly talk about it and knows it's not something proud of to do.

Nope, sorry not yet. If he does, I will bash him up and down the field the same.

Let me give u a male version of ur story.
"The secret for rich women coming for more is having a foot long that last 3 hours. So, I spent countless of hours and $$$ keeping my foot long hard but tender. Finally, my hard work has paid off. I got this auntie that inherit hundred of million from his late husband and buys me yacht, rolex and mansion. Damm, i'm finally in the pinnacle of success, you losers out the should learn from me".

That's exactly like SMB002 said, it's normal to be screwed up. It's really screwed up to romanticize it.

It's not all bad in ur sharing. The focus should be on, how u weather thick and thin with him and that would be a strong inspiring foundation to form a a relationship. But, that would be false unless you define getting "richer" as thick and thin (Try not to forget you wrote that he is a UK and born into a family to inherit business empire). That's on top of you explicitly said, "you wouldn't waste time on men older than you that's not successful *in ur messed up definition". I'm inclined to believe that it's thick and thin my ass

This post has been edited by RUI: Jul 19 2018, 05:38 PM

Nope. It will get kicked up and down the field like a ball. And left to right too.

Since when pornographic materials are target to female audience?

I mean...
1) “I got a foot long down there and my girl moans in ecstasy.“ public response: yeah yeah, good for u.
2) “I got a foot long down there, and I lost count of my many chick my bitch”. Public response like: what’s wrong with you?
3) “I got a foot long down there, and guess what? I banged 3 widows last week. One bought me a watch, One bought me a sport car and One bought me a mansion. U loser should learn from me”. Public response: lu ki siao liao ar?

Promiscuity, manipulative, superficiality, materialistic or leeching off other labour aren’t virtues. If they are WRONG or not; technically, although they hurt nobody. But it shouldn’t be encouraged what’s more a manual about it.

You r too obsessed with wealth. Often that’s the language of the poor.

Your obsession should be on creating value to society, to the marketplace. Bring your potential and skill to the next level. Money is just a marker to keep track of ur progress. And his success and wealth has nothing to do with you? Can tumpang One ar? Since u r engaged, it’s pretty pointless to ask, but I’m gonna ask anyway. How would u feel about him insisting you to sign prenup ?

So, what do u think about people that donates their money off and start over? Does that mean they are any less successful/ambitious.

Ur kids can form a football team is it?

How much money do you need before you can do all that?

IMO and assessment of anyone doing what you are doing(not ad-hominem), you checked #2, #3, #5, #9.

#7, #10 are more like you try to deter people for criticizing you.

E.g. A robber robbed a bank and brags about his loot. And when his peer criticizes him; he pulls #7 and #10.
Totally oblivious or purposely ignore the fact that robbing the bank is wrong and quickly assume that his peers are sour grapes and jealous of him.

P.S. I believe what you are doing here is more like, "if a robber did his research well, put in effort, robbed a bank and the enforcement not able to pin him; he deserves the loots". Technically, he can't be jailed even if he really robbed the bank.

How about false confidence?

How do you tell if someone is exuding false confidence.


Refer to my robber story.

1) Those biographies focused on what "Who, When, What, Where, Why" and "How" to bring value to market place and in return for the value they brought, they are rewarded with the wealth.

and they are not the same as

2) "Who, When, What, Where, Why" and "How" to deceive the market place that a person has brought value in.

And why does 9 pages and 7500 views?

3) 9 pages of comments are mostly pointing out that, it makes no sense. No sense at all for a RICH person to go such elaborated extend to CON another rich man.

it's because.

4) A rich person wouldn't give a damm who he/she marries as long as the other fella makes him/her happy. You may ask those women who are actually successful where the husband actually earn less. And totally aghast ed with people who rationalize with "who wants the daughter to marry a poor man". A person can be poor in financially; but they should not be poor in character and attitude.

Think about it logically, If a person can get his/her shit straight, why would he/she specifically targets certain people with certain traits/attributes?
Answer is obvious. He/she can't get his/her shit straight.


Read up on Barbara Corcoran. She is inspiring.

She thrived in male dominated industry. All by herself.

A when she reads about real estate magazines, i'm pretty sure she didn't do that so that some "rich" dudes will find her attractive and buys her a Maldives vacation. If she read this thread, she probably .

P.S. This is the part that I feel that i'm actually a feminist, fighting against people (for some weird reason, majority women) that insults and demean women.

That's like some men pulling the pump and dump move. It's transactional. It doesn't change the fact, it's disrespectful and demeaning.

But the question is, should it be encouraged?

Should we condone that "Robbing the bank is OK as long as you don't get caught and actually writes a manual about it".

I'm pretty sure Ralna's comment would be "Who knows it would be best-seller".

Wait, you are right.
We should look forward to "A Guide to Most Cost Effective Way for Hot Chick to Spread". It's 1001 pages thick.
If there are more Ralna's and her minions, the book will be 1000 empty pages...

and at page 1001 says:



How profound and easy is that?

A true confidence requires NO external validation. It's not the same as it requires not validation. I'm saying result speaks for itself.

"Self-affirmation without discipline is the beginning of delusion", I find this very meaningful. And discipline definitely comes before confidence and assertiveness.

Wow, that's insulting to majority of really rich men who don't do that.

I think at least top 30 in fortunate 100 don't. But too bad Kobe Bryant does, Tiger Woods too. World ain't perfect.

I'm pretty sure that's what cfa28 thinks how rich men think. Yeah right. Great source of reference.

No. It's not money that keeps people poor. It's IGNORANCE!

And that's how ignorant that statement is. Human civilization has thrived and created abundance way before concept of "MONEY" existed is the evidence how UNTRUE that statement is. Human has thrived because of our ability to use our brain and hones our skills to create value, to create abundance(Unfortunately, not all have such ability, and such ability varies to different degree).

I strongly suggest reader to NOT take that advice. It sounds true but it's not. If you believe that's true then you will check the three symptoms(#6, #7, #8) of the author's reference to inferiority complex.



I like have said before, money is a marker to the value we have created. The focus shouldn't be money but improving ourself, educate ourself, thinking critically, articulate accurately, hones our skill and bring more value to the society. Technically, being manipulative, deceitful are skills too. And unfortunately, you are innocent will proven guilty applies. That is the loop hole the author is exploiting. And author did acknowledge that if your crimes catches up to you, YOU WILL PAY THE PRICE FOR THINGS THAT YOU DON'T DESERVE. Read the below comments.



I spend sometime and actually think why i'm so worked up.

I think the reason is I believe in Cinderella story. And this author intends not to create more Cinderella but Cinderella's step sisters in real life. In the story, Cinderalla married the Prince and lived happy ever after. But in this case, the step sister found a way to cheat and she is marrying the prince. And shamelessly coming up with a guide how to do that.

Eh! if there are more girls turning into the step sisters with this cheat code, where am I gonna find my Cinderella?

P.S. This one is just for the laugh.

I think the most accurate way of debunking all your "statement" is...None of them can be verified.

With this simple fact, anyone with common sense will not use "claim" as reference in virtual world. But what you can do, is use reason.

It's make your stories gel up, intelligent and not coming off like a grandiose. Not very smart people are easily confused.

Let me give and example on how to do that. LEARN!

"I think the trick to girls cumming more is to hit the G-Spot. It requires abit of length and girth. That's my personal experience. What you guys think?".

Highly intelligent one will figure out that what i'm trying to say is I got a foot and pretty fat one too. But the focus of my statement is "hit the G-Spot".
And it comes with a hint of humility of seeking advice from others.

Yours are more like total grandiose, not much focus, IMO, mostly ignorant. Definitely, ignorant about the implication of what you are preaching here. I hope my Cinderella story gives you hint.




I have encountered people that said, "I refuse to accept this payment if you find my service sub-standard. I appreciate if you would extend the deadline further for me to deliver a service to your satisfaction". That's integrity, that's honesty, that's pride. These are stories worth sharing.

You see, the focus is high quality service. Money is secondary. I personally operate at that standard. But it's up to you to believe.

What's your focus? Money is the primary focus. And here's how to cheat and it's okay to cheat(I'm not making that up! If readers read carefully, they can easily spot it). ! That's whole blardy essay about! And reject every argument why that's WRONG.


That's a topic that I spend alot of time thinking. Is it poverty that motivates crime or is it relative poverty motivates crime?
And recently, what I have been suspecting resonate what a clinical psychologist conclusion. It's relative poverty. If you are well read and informed, you should know who I'm talking about.

I can relate my experience and PM me if interested. Else, I'm gonna come off a grandiose like you.

No, I'm not afraid of any man/woman robbing me. What I detest is, I'm not that a boring person that the free meal is more attractive than I am.
Insulting! And the woman is what? Something I can buy with money? Double insulting. What good is there?

The focus should be sincerity and ingenuity towards one another and the curves and the wealth is secondary.


We should do that in person. That could save us hours and covers wider range of topics.

Not sure if you are up for it, one of the longest "debate" I had was with a lawyer on Civil War for 12 hours straight. Breakfast till dinner. And I forgot who foots the bill. And her concluding remark after failing to rebuke was "You are just jealous that Tony Stark is rich & chick digs him". That's not a fair rebuttal.

I hope that you are the type that argues for fun. I'm attacking the persona you "conjured" and the act which hopefully, does not reflect your truself.

The wolf is baited. I'm sure we both had fun.

Good nite.

See what? How ugly human can be? I had enough.

I am aware how myself is motivated by self-interest. What would be more meaningful is to go beyond yourself.

How motivated person is in his/her self-interest is nothing inspiring.
That's like a soldier being proud telling people how fast ran away from his post in a gun battle leaving his comrades to die.

Unlike this crazy mfk. Often people like that aren't rich. But they are reliable and trustworthy. I will be interested to know people like him and what gives him the courage to that extend of a sacrifice. I'm pretty sure it's not "Because, I want Victoria Cross".
Gurkha who repelled Taliban attack gets bravery medal

In your guide, that's encouraging people to be the step-sister. If it's you or not, that's for you to know.
If you are or not does not affect me. Hence, you should know, like everybody else, no one cares.

As if anybody gives a damm if I have a foot long.

Eh, in that story, are those within her control? She didn't covertly build the carriages, stitch her beautiful dress, and save up for the glass slipper so that she can deceive the prince. She didn't do all that. Your guide suggest that girls should.

Infact, her first dress was sewn by the birds and mouses before being town by the useless step sisters.
Why would the mice and birds do that for her? (You can argue that she was nice to them so that they will do that for her)
Which leads to the next question why would a manipulative cheating b*tch be nice so many mouses and birds to get attention of a prince that may not exist?

The only part that she is crying and weeping is when she is being bullied yet again.

That's in still faith in people that kindness and compassion create abundance. And not self-interest.
Look at her life, it seemed so little and yet so much.

No one really cares if you have an ambition to beat Bill Gates.

But if you are interested to alleviate poverty, I will be interested.

And your point is?

I know what's your point...my understanding of the anger to the insult, is not comparable to those really pitiful men.
I don't blame you if you can't understand. Neither of us can.

This is inaccurate.
You like to make money and you like to manipulate people to make you money is very different.

The difference is utility. Latter cares a world about the other person's monetizing ability.
Having that said, that's exactly an employer to employee relationship. And there is no conflict of interest.

If it's possible to make it pseudo romantic/employer & employee relationship is subjective.

More important question, although it's not mutually exclusive, do you girls marry for a person's monetizing ability or love?

And for guys, how do you feel about someone "loving" you for your monetizing ability.

For me, monetizing ability is nothing unique. But, I am unique. *self-praise.

Which part of "Oi Bangla! pasang itu tingkap dalam 1 satu minit. I mau 100 sebelum lunch!" equates money-making ability.

The real value is actually at the bangla to install the window in less than a minute.

I wouldn't say she is totally useless. She would be very valuable if she manage to sell the window for 8 digit with 50% margin where 49% profit goes to creative accounting and convince the bangla he is worth 1% of the deal and sticks around. She is really quite something.

It's just, I pity the bangla.

I already addressed that in my previous post. 1001 pages guide to marrying a hot chick. Okay, I stand corrected. Only applies to some shallow hot chick.

I'm being practical. You are pretty naive to believe that you can conveniently walk away 50% of whatever he has in worse case.
I need not bothered elaborate further on how insecure and short sighted that is.

What I'm saying is there is nothing secure that way if compared to possessing the money making ability herself.
I'm not saying it's mutually exclusive. The focus is possessing that ability yourself.

I believe that's the equivalent of numbers of marriage end with the husband cheating. Perhaps, you can research on how small of the fraction of what she think she can walk away with and what she actually walk away with in a divorce. That will better educate people. Definitely, the only winner is the lawyer.

Sigh...On the contrary, it's love that some men actually walk the extra mile to put smile on the father, mother, wife and children's face.
Else, why bother to put in the extra hours and shoulder the burden? What better motivation if it's not love? Yes, self-interest. Like all the cheating bastards. All the wrong doings are well rationalize on the premise of cheating is part of his marriage entitlement because it's transactional. Why bother to talk and work it out. documents on the table, sign and move the F out. Yes, technically if that's the agreement; Nothing wrong.

1) Else, explain to me why rich man is targeted if you are already rich? By right, as long as he doesn't come asking you for money, it's all cool.

2) Then, why is the title isn't How to Marry a Rich Man and Make Him Richer?

Does it not make more sense with the How to Marry a Poor Man to Make Him Rich? Considering the fact the rich already have them.

Isn't that obvious that's not the intent? Isn't it obvious the whole intent of marrying a rich man is about what he can do for her, FINANCIALLY.
And if it's true that she already at her pinnacle of financial success, don't you think that the title would be "How to Marry a Man with a Foot Long".

Help me complete that statement. Thanks.
Men marry a women with intent to start a family is because men are in capable of carrying a baby.
Some women marry a rich men with intent to get rich is because that woman is incapable of ...............

It's not clear what the general public establishes on the other 3 categories. I will get back to you.

It's pretty clear they are less malicious to me.

That will be useful. Thanks.

The opposite applies.

Person at higher position voluntarily help someone at lower position is generosity/nobility.
Person at lower position takes advantages of someone at higher position via deceitful mean is ......(*you complete the sentence)

What do you think about this word "fraudster"?

You missed the point. He doesn't need you to make him rich. You need him to foot ur Maldives trip. Because if you can, it wouldn't matter if he could.
But he does need you to make him babies. Hopefully, there is something worthy to pass on.

Please do elaborate on how you make him richer. That will be useful to everyone.
And not methods of deceiving him and brags about the reward of the deceit.
And not rationalize it with disgusting behavior of some men. two wrongs doesn't make one right.

Sigh. You are missing the point.

My point is, be nice a nice person because you believe in kindness and compassion is not the same as being a nice person so that you can pick his pocket.

Why is it so hard to differentiate and accept that?

I will say it would be generous and meaningful for a lady to lift another soul out of poverty and build his esteem up. He will voluntarily take a bullet for you.

Which men do that all the time. But bcos it comes free, that it becomes an entitlement. If a woman do that, "wowwwwww! That's so noble".
And some men, "tulan" liao. See the bitterness around. Some men like myself, "tulan" also no use. Keep doing what's right and be a good man la.

Big round of applause to women like that. That's the testament that gender equality is bearing fruit.

Wanting women to have the ability to buy me dinner isn't the same as wanting a women buy me dinner.

I will still buy her dinner because i'm a gentlemen.

If you genuinely care about your partners security and well-being, it shouldn't bother you if he is already rich or he possess what it takes to be rich.
What should bother you is if you have the capability bring value to his life.

That's why I did not say that. I said, it's more useful to do that with poor people if the plan is to enrich your partner.

Your argument is like, hiring a life-guard during an Olympic Swimming Competition. Apparently, Michael Phelps need to saved in a pool.

Cilaka. Go such a big circle to brag about yourself. Then, useful thing don't want share.
*speechless.

I certainly hate the malicious intent behind that statement. And I believe everyone should to. In most of my reply here, it's coherent that I attacked any malicious intent regardless if it comes from either gender. But I will admit I am more gentle with woman. I'm a sexist!

In response to your THAT "relationship dynamics", I do not deny that there are malicious gold-digging b*tch and pretty successful at it.
What I'm disagreeing is if the society should have more gold-digging b*tch, what's more coming up with a manual with it.

P.S. Looks like our Notti Little Red Riding Hood is getting triggered. If you doing something not to be proud of, try keep the volume down. That's why if someone is stealing, he does it at night and quietly. How twisted it is to rationalize stealing is OK and come up with a manual for it. And encourage to shout out loud as he is stealing. Wa piaaaa.

I had fun. Have a nice day.

Too much frustration in my real life. My mum always tell me, "傻人有傻扶“. Cant agree more.
i try to be stupid here and see if I can hv some fun.

Can you imagine if I do all that in real life? That fella will literally either go berserk or call in sick tmr.
So, come in here...create s strawman out of one of the few stupid thread in here and beat the crap out of it.

Fuhhhh...what a therapy.

These are peoples that keep my faith in humanity & love.

Who knows how to differentiate values with accessories. Who appreciates people for who he/she is.

I hope there are more people like you, given the opportunity to taste a true satisfaction of harboring the rewards of his/her own labour.
And truly believe in him/herself that he/she could be whoever he/she wants to be and live a fulfilling life. I believe this is the only way that we can reduce people that EXPLOITS personal relationship for FINANCIAL SECURITY/GAIN. That's just appalling.

"vulnerable and sincerest part", That's not easy to come by. I'm not sure how well this forum represents the public as a whole, but it's pretty saddening to see what people here prioritize. B40, M40, T40 and bla bla bla. Do you think top tier spends their time thinking which category they are or they spend more time thinking what they should focus and working on? To grow from one category to another category takes times. Lotsa work.

I will be more interest in what anyone do to enable oneself to such self-reliance and success at each phase, and not ability to remember classification of income group. I personally think that able to remember periodic table is more useful.

This post has been edited by RUI: Jul 31 2018, 12:56 PM