QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Apr 24 2019, 09:44 AM)
Possible answers to your many questions:
1) why are the rest these missiles are just kept lying in storage?
Because missiles kept in storage last longer than missiles on a boat out at sea, even if they are kept in their canisters.
2) why do they insist on keeping the two ancient 35-year old Kasturi-class corvettes fully armed with Exocets instead of the more numerous, modern and capable Kedah-class?
Possibly because the Kedahs lack the operator console and minor modifications/systems needed to operate the Exocets, and there's no operational reason to have another pair of Exocet-capable boats at this time
3) What tactical advantage can get gained from this policy?
Possibly there is only a need to train 4 ships crews for antiship combat operations on the Lekius and Kasturis, whereas adding Exocets to 2 Kedahs would mean having to train additional 2 ships crews for antiship combat ops. There is no current operational need for that.
Also this would take away 2 ships and their crews from carrying out their usual patrol duties in order to conduct training. Again, where is the operational need for that*?
*yes, it can be argued that there are certain needs justifying more combat ships. But this simply shows that to add let's say 2 frigates for combat ops requires a significant investment not just in equipment, but also in war stocks, recruitment and training. Yes the hardware is expensive but so is the human resource component, we focus a lot on the former but should also bear in mind the latter.
so although it would be nice to have another 2 frigates, 4, even 6 or more; bear in mind the costs can be very significant.