Basically it is part of the NU7100 series family .

NU7090 is further limited to having only 2 HDMI and 1 USB port , compare to the 3 HDMI ports and 2 USB ports on NU7100.

The rest of the specs are identical , the TV performance should be the same as NU7100 & NU7103.

This post has been edited by Convael: Aug 30 2018, 06:58 AM

HDR10+ is basically a HDR format with dynamic meta data like Dolby Vision except it is much less popular.
Don't worry too much about it , there are hardly any HDR10 + content right now for it to be a concern.

Both TVs are compatible with current HDR 10 format, that's what you should care about.


You should consider your room condition first before buying the TVs , for a dark or dimmer room goes with the Samsung , for a brighter / living hall where you also need a wider viewing angles , get the Panasonic.

Input lag is very low ( roughly 13-15ms ) , one of the lowest among TVs.

The NU7400 is a bit better since it has a wider color gamut , but this advantage is only visible in HDR content playbacks . It also comes packing with more smart TV features than the Sony model ( such as smart remote control , 5G WIFI & TV mirroring ...etc )

If you plan to use the TV as a monitor & sit relatively close to the screen , you will notice color and brightness downgrades by the edge of the VA screen . That is caused by the poor viewing angles of VA TV . The edge of the large screen will experience a dramatic angles shifting when viewed from a close distance . This is where IPS TV becomes handy.

This post has been edited by Convael: Sep 15 2018, 08:03 PM

Theoretically for WIFI streaming , it can allow speed up to 1Gbps ++ . But the CPU of the TV (which is kind of weak ) also play a part in processing the data , 100 ~ 400 mb/sec is a more realistic expectation.


Base on many of the TV models I have inspected , none of the current TVs ( except a certain China brands such as TCL ) has a gigabit Ethernet port.
Including the high end QLEDs and OLEDs. It is pretty safe to assume most of them has a 10/100 , 60 mb / sec is pretty much the reasonable expectation.


For modern day Apps streaming , that should be sufficient. Primary because streaming videos suffer a major loss of video quality ( bitrates ) in the process of transcoding .
For eg , the 4k movie on Netflix is of much smaller size than its 4k bluray counterpart . In reality , the so called " 4k " streaming video quality is more or less the same as what you see from a 1080p bluray disc , which is quite a bit of downgrade .



If you want to stream very high quality video files such as 4k Bluray Rips and remux from your HTPC / NAS , the Ethernet LAN port is unable to handle the massive data transfer . You have to rely on WIFI streaming but this can be problematic due to many of the 2018 basic 4k TVs do not support 5GHz WIFI.

Your alternative , is to connect the TV to an external storage via USB which can be very hassling .

This post has been edited by Convael: Sep 20 2018, 03:17 AM

correct .

More or less the same , but the NU7103 has more smart TV features than the NU7100 .

This post has been edited by Convael: Nov 8 2018, 07:14 PM

It really depends on the quality of the files and how it is ripped.

For the pristine source of Ultra HD Bluray quality , there will be some buffering and stuttering around.


You are better off with a media player .

Just checked on MU7000 & MU6300 , both have UNIFI TVplay from the app hub.

The thing about Samsung TV is , they NEVER update their OS .
They may add a feature and two via firmware , they don't upgrade your OS to the newest version , at least not via WIFI / Internet.

For eg , if the models from 2017 are using tizen 3.0 , it will be using tizen 3.0 forever while the 2018 TVs will be using tizen 4.0 .

I am not sure if this has anything to do with you not finding the Unifi TV apps .
Maybe it is not yet supported for the newer Tizen version.


follow this , but ignore the Local Dimming settings & white balance settings .

This post has been edited by Convael: Nov 18 2018, 07:17 AM

Not good , the QLED TVs don't sell very well in MY unfortunately .


Especially not the Q6FN model , which feels like a slightly improved NU8000 but cost so much more.
Because of the pricing ranges , Q6FN feels a little unnecessary . If someone want an upgrade over NU8000 , they should just go for the Q7FN or if they want the best 4k QLED , the Q9FN.

This post has been edited by Convael: Nov 30 2018, 12:29 PM

That is unfortunate , how did it crack ?
The screen is the most expensive component to replace within a television . Replacement will probably cost you 90% of the price of a whole new TV .

Samsung is currently planning the debut of their 2019 QLED TVs

They are also planning to bring in their 8k TV Q900R ( in 75 " and 82") for the first time in Malaysia , pre-order freebies including their newest S10+ Galaxy flagship phone ( 512 GB ) and Galaxy tab S4 .

The entry level Quantum Dots TV , 49 inches of Q60R will also be available to preorder for a short period for a price tag below RM3000 .

Other QLED models to join the launch include Q75R and its respective upgrade Q90R , the latter of which is going to be the flagship 4k QLED TV for Samsung in 2019.
Both of these 2 models are going to utilize the more advanced Full Array Local Dimming.

Two mid-range sound bars HW-Q60R & HW-Q70R will also reportedly joining the TV line up .



The official Price list I've gotten

Q900R 75 " : RM 59,999 (Flagship 8K )

Q90R 65 " : RM 18,999
Q90R 75 " : RM 29,999

Q75R 75 " : RM 19,999
Q75R 65 " : RM 13,999
Q75R 55 ": RM 7999

Q60R 49 " : RM 4999 (* Pre-order price 2999 )

This post has been edited by Convael: Apr 4 2019, 07:18 PM

No bro , it is yet to be released .


Nope . Not at this moment at least , things may change if Q70R suddenly become the hottest selling model in MY but I really doubt it with that price tag.


A weebit of correction here : Samsung has renamed the Q70R to Q75R in our country .

This post has been edited by Convael: Apr 4 2019, 07:15 PM

Youtube review , that's where the problem is .


And I assume you are talking about ABT electronics , they are an electronic shop .
You can hardly call those reviews , more like unboxing previews . The sales pitch should be obvious by now , they want to sell you those TVs.


Real TV reviewers are hard to come by thesedays as they find themselves in very difficult position .
When you say not so good things about the TV , the PR of the brands don't take them nicely .

As a result you end up getting boycott from their event , they will never send you anymore TV to play around .
Either that or they send you cherry picked unit to garner positive reviews while actual product being far less competent , Samsung is particularly guilty of this .

This post has been edited by Convael: Apr 19 2019, 06:23 AM

Not at the default MSRP ( 4999 ).

There are a lot of compromises behind the 2999 promotional price tag .
Looking at how many features they have removed , the Q60R is not so much different than NU7400 which can be found at cheaper price now.

Not saying the TV is bad per se , it just means the 49" Q60R is not the affordable , dreamy, full-featured QLED TV we thought it was .

No local dimming ( which explains the mediocre brightness rating ) , no Freesync/VRR support , No 120 hz native refresh ( Not to be confused with 100 motion rate listed on Samsung's website )
Good thing is this TV probably has the best color volume out of the bunch of TV in this price range thanks to the quantum dots filter , so you still get something out of the QLED line up.

This post has been edited by Convael: Apr 19 2019, 06:46 AM

You definitely get more bangs for your money on NU8000 , too many features have been removed on the 49" Q60R.

yes , very .

Brighter , more colorful to say the least .


Something is off with the Q60R and Q75R this year , even the anti-reflection they used are the semi-gloss one . ( Q7FN uses the full glossy coating which is more expensive and better at fighting off glares)

I have expected more from Samsung especially when these babies have a default price tag of RM5000 ~ RM7000.

There is literally no reason to upgrade to the Q60R / Q75R over the Q6FN / Q7FN .

This post has been edited by Convael: May 2 2019, 02:41 PM

Arrogance has got the better of them , especially when they don't even have any competitor in the sector .

Sony and Panasonic have basically given up on the VA LCD market , no other brands are making competent enough TV to threaten them in the mid range LCD market.
Bad practice for the display business .

You have already bought it , does it matters what others say about your tv now ?

Just enjoy it

This post has been edited by Convael: May 13 2019, 02:34 AM