Streamyx The Unofficial Streamyx 4Mbps Users Club V1, Combo RM 160 Per Month *Updated Info*
|
|
 May 25 2009, 11:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya  
|
QUOTE(MX510 @ May 25 2009, 06:38 PM) Still working at full speed here :-) with the previous screenshot ip i post earlier 218.111.19.XXX U forever full speed wan =.-'' everytime u post download pict is max speed.  Y TM so scared to slow u down?  Come! tell us who u are! sure some VIP kia ....  This post has been edited by andrew9292: May 25 2009, 11:23 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 3 2009, 02:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(pillowman @ Jun 3 2009, 01:26 PM) any 218.111 ip users here can help me to check the latency to my seedbox in germany? are you sure you got the IP correct...cant reach itip: 217.117.174.47 thanks  |
|
|
Jun 3 2009, 02:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
Trace from visual route software on 218.111.5.XXX
[attachmentid=1001912] [attachmentid=1001913] [attachmentid=1001916] --------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Andrew>ping 212.117.174.47 -n 12 Pinging 212.117.174.47 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 212.117.174.47: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=56 Reply from 212.117.174.47: bytes=32 time=221ms TTL=56 Reply from 212.117.174.47: bytes=32 time=221ms TTL=56 Reply from 212.117.174.47: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=56 Reply from 212.117.174.47: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=56 Reply from 212.117.174.47: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=56 Reply from 212.117.174.47: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=56 Reply from 212.117.174.47: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=56 Reply from 212.117.174.47: bytes=32 time=221ms TTL=56 Reply from 212.117.174.47: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=56 Reply from 212.117.174.47: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=56 Reply from 212.117.174.47: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=56 Ping statistics for 212.117.174.47: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 219ms, Maximum = 221ms, Average = 219ms |
|
|
Jun 5 2009, 12:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(Suk @ Jun 4 2009, 11:31 PM) Class B subnet got 60K+ IP's available. Wow. Lets put it into a scenario. If other 4MB user getting other IP's mean they gonna have almost 60,000 4mb streamyx user. Lets say of the 60000 4mb users, half of them are torrenting/downloading at an average of 400kbps. It Means: 30000 users X 400kbps = 12000000kbps which means 12000000kbps divide by 1000 = 12000Mbps which also means that total of 12Gbps of bandwidth is used.  NO JOKE This post has been edited by andrew9292: Jun 5 2009, 12:08 AM |
|
|
Jun 7 2009, 03:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(prasys @ Jun 5 2009, 01:07 PM) Bias calculation. Its impossible to have 60000 4Mbps users at time. For instance today , I am just surfing the web , checking my e-mail , facebook and IRC. I am just using around 50-100 kilobits per second. so your calculation is somewhat biased and it doesn't take account into what 4Mbps users do. Yes some of them do torrent , others like me (at this time) - would be using it for productivity stuff (i.e researching, IMing , and IRCing) Yeah that's you. I agree it's rather bias, but among my circle of friends, lets say 20, i know about 15 of them that are heavy downloaders... so yeah. But if you take into account the other thousands of 1mbps users that torrent...that figure is easily reachable... |
|
|
Jun 10 2009, 10:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
218.111.4.XX
========================================================================== VisualRoute trace to newswww.bbc.net.uk ========================================================================== This trace was started on Jun 10, 2009 10:48:58 PM. The host 'newswww.bbc.net.uk' (known as nol-vip01.cwwtf.bbc.co.uk) has been found, and is reachable in 11 hops. Also, it responded to HTTP requests on port 80 (it is running server Apache, which responded in 701ms). The TTL value of packets received from it is 49.In general this route is reasonably quick, with hops responding on average within 164ms. However, all hops after hop 6 in network 'TMNET' respond particularly slowly. The DNS lookup was completed almost instantaneously (less than 2ms - this may be the result of caching). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This post has been edited by andrew9292: Jun 10 2009, 10:52 PM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 14 2009, 10:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(fabianz03 @ Jun 14 2009, 08:36 PM) Yeap, it's the technic TM is using to shut their customers mouth. by giving them extra bandwidth. NO...not really... Mine was an UPGRADE from 1Mbps to 1.5Mbps. Only a certain batch and amount of users that signed up on a certain promotion period a few years back, when streamyx was still new in the market got it...not all.My friend recently about few months back, who signed up about the same time as me.... got a call from TM too, saying that his account will be upgraded to 1.5Mbps (he did not do anything). A few months later he found out that his speed was miscapped to 512kbps...but he isnt particular with such things as he just read email and MSN mostly... This post has been edited by andrew9292: Jun 14 2009, 10:16 PM |
|
|
Jun 25 2009, 10:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
Damn weird, pings are much less but it buffers much more... I'm getting ready for my next complain now. How the hell can the ping be lowered yet we cant receive full speed. Only one answer : Throttle.
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Andrew>ping www.youtube.com -n 6 Pinging youtube-ui.l.google.com [74.125.153.113] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 74.125.153.113: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=244 Reply from 74.125.153.113: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=245 Reply from 74.125.153.113: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=244 Reply from 74.125.153.113: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=244 Reply from 74.125.153.113: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=245 Reply from 74.125.153.113: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=244 Ping statistics for 74.125.153.113: Packets: Sent = 6, Received = 6, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 63ms, Maximum = 66ms, Average = 64ms C:\Documents and Settings\Andrew> |
|
|
Jul 2 2009, 12:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(BugFace @ Jul 1 2009, 05:39 AM) Well, I told the TMPoint lady I previously emailed help@tm.com.my and that help email support told me under 3km can receive this service. She just look straight at me and repeatly said that only under 2km and preferably under 1.5km. She then talked with a senior staff who confirm to her what she said was true, including unable to downgrade etc. Yes under 3km can receive service ONLY IF the copper in your area and house is good. To reach max speed of 4Mbps (no other affecting factors such as routing), 1.5km will definately can, but with Malaysia's copper line that has not been upgraded since i dont know how long.............. anything near to 3km or more is questionableShe then kept saying once I signup at TMPoint there is no turning back unless the technician/contractor specifically gives me a letter after testing my line to allow for downgrade and that word of mouth does NOT count. Repeat that signup at TMPoint is final there is no going back, she also told me yes maybe your line ok during testing after a while later if have trouble I can't downgrade even if the issue can't be fixed by them that I will need to stick with it through whole 1 year period. I went to TMpoint Jalan Burmah, Pg. Any neighbors around you that use 4Mbps? If yes then u can take it up to TM. But i believe they have their reasons for telling you that your wont get the expected speed if you subscribe... and that informing you there will be no turning back for u. Normally they will just sell you the service and just make you regret for that 1 year period... At least now, this particular TM Point shows some sense of responsibility. QUOTE(llkh @ Jul 1 2009, 11:53 AM) same here bro..can u imagine, i get different colors of answers everytime i step into TMPoint...and i mean the same TMPoint?! they told me my area has available ports but not supported but can apply but rejected..and then before u know it...a few days later, the contractor called me to test my speed and then even before u can believe it..u r accessing lowyat.net with a 4mbps connection at the comfort of you home ...with Premium IPs u got lucky ;p how far are you to the DSLAM? all i can say is..persistence and patience helps a lot when dealing with TMPoint BTW 218.111 damn slow lately, starting 29th July |
|
|
Jul 2 2009, 11:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
I'm having new range here. 218.111.64.XXX ultimate slowness on that block.
|
|
|
Jul 2 2009, 11:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
218.111.4 & 218.111.5 slow, but 218.111.64 slowest
Added on July 2, 2009, 11:33 pmover 50 pings to DNS i get 5 timeouts Added on July 2, 2009, 11:36 pmusually my speedtest can reach maximum line capacity in 3 seconds, but now, max speed is reached only in the last 3 seconds of speedtest and it starts with a very low speed about 0.2mbps This post has been edited by andrew9292: Jul 2 2009, 11:36 PM |
|
|
Jul 12 2009, 06:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
sure...
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Andrew>ping sebbs.it168.com -n 10 Pinging sebbs.it168.com [221.192.136.198] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 221.192.136.198: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=50 Reply from 221.192.136.198: bytes=32 time=132ms TTL=50 Reply from 221.192.136.198: bytes=32 time=128ms TTL=51 Reply from 221.192.136.198: bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=50 Reply from 221.192.136.198: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=51 Reply from 221.192.136.198: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=51 Reply from 221.192.136.198: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=50 Reply from 221.192.136.198: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=51 Reply from 221.192.136.198: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=50 Reply from 221.192.136.198: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=50 Ping statistics for 221.192.136.198: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 126ms, Maximum = 136ms, Average = 130ms |
|
|
Jul 14 2009, 03:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
218.111 slow today
Malaysia  This is what happens when it leaves this country       This post has been edited by andrew9292: Jul 14 2009, 04:00 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 14 2009, 10:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
218.111.0.XXX back to normal already, full speed here...
|
|
|
Jul 17 2009, 10:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(gsan @ Jul 17 2009, 10:49 AM) any 4mb user can use pingplotter to do some test on http://sebbs.it168.com/ and http://www.right.com.cn/forum/ ?? what is the point of doing so? we all very well know that 218.111 ip address have better routing than others... |
|
|
Jul 20 2009, 11:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
today slowpoke..cant access international without VPN
|
|
|
Jul 21 2009, 04:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
Same here, MSN cant login and facebook and alot of international sites cant be accessed after 11pm... need to find a way to collect and shoot to MCMC n PMO again ==
|
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 08:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
my DL speed drop by half after 6pm ==
|
|
|
Jul 27 2009, 02:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(defnose @ Jul 27 2009, 11:36 AM) Hey guys, i maybe in a wrong section but cant be fcked to open a new thread. Anyways im using 1.0mbps shitmyx connection and a few months back i was able to play my Battlefield 2 online. The online server is based in Australia but until recently, probably starting April i was not able to play online anymore because the ping i get was ridicoulousy high!!! 1st of all, not maybe. U are in the wrong section... I constantly get kicked by the server because of high ping. Im located in Country Heights, Kajang by the way so im thinking of upgrading to 2.0mbps since 4mbps is not available just yet. So what is the problem actually? Cause i was playing fine but now cant even play mann.. Is 2mbps worth the upgrade or shitmyx gonna give me the same fcking slow connction problem? Or do i need to configure something?   Sifus please help  2mbps will only help you if u get the 218.111 ip range, otherwise it's equally useless... |
|
|
Jul 27 2009, 09:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
I'm on 218.111
Today to local server  May 9th speedtest to LA [attachmentid=1104112] MX510, i shall join u ;p This post has been edited by andrew9292: Jul 27 2009, 09:12 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0480sec
 0.56
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 11:27 PM |
Quote