Streamyx The Unofficial Streamyx 4Mbps Users Club V1, Combo RM 160 Per Month *Updated Info*
|
|
 Aug 28 2009, 08:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
 
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya  
|
QUOTE(KKW @ Aug 28 2009, 06:12 PM) how much snr margin only counted low? view the last page before this page...it's the top post oh..icic.. btw, my aunty downstream margin 23.5db  lol page? this is not paper tho...  |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 08:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(MX510 @ Aug 28 2009, 08:36 PM) The latest maintenance in Serdang was to install the throttling devices that area is a high utilization area WOW. Got rich people in that area? As far as i know, those high end alot vip area like bangsar, taman tun, mont kiara, hartamas, kota damansara, sierramas...I checked with a few heavy downloaders in that live in those high class places, all don't have experience this capping thing... but there is not much people for me to get feedback from tho...and i'm not sure if they are on leased line, you know, those guarantee speed kind of line, but very expensive... anyone who live in those kind of area using 4mbps experience cap? This post has been edited by andrew9292: Aug 28 2009, 09:00 PM |
|
|
Sep 13 2009, 10:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(Acrisius @ Sep 13 2009, 10:38 PM) and you're good in bragging about your speed he's the type that cant feel the pain of others. everytime ppl say slow he will post his fast speed. baka    |
|
|
Sep 16 2009, 07:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
It's okay, think positive at least now they don't give you the service if your area cant support it. Better than give you and let you pay for nuts later ; )
|
|
|
Sep 18 2009, 06:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
FYI, REAL SNR and SNR Margin should never be confused with each other.
SNR is your actual SNR SNR Margin is the margin between you current SNR and the minimum SNR your current line needs to be stable. For example if it says SNR Margin is 6, it means that: (your minimum SNR margin for you current line) + 6db lets say your minimum margin is 6dB, so it means: (6dB) + 6dB = REAL SNR Margin of 12dB ---------------------------------------------------- So lets say, the minimum margin to run 4096kbps is 12dB. Your modem reports an SNR MARGIN of 8dB, it means 12dB+8dB = 20dB SNR (REAL) 20dB SNR will put you in good with little or no disconnection problems ; ) REAL SNR Classification: 6bB. or below = Bad and will experience no line synchronisation and frequent disconnections 7dB-10dB. = Fair but does not leave much room for variances in conditions. 11dB-20dB. = Good with little or no disconnection problems 20dB-28dB. = Excellent 29dB. or above = Outstanding This post has been edited by andrew9292: Sep 18 2009, 06:17 AM |
|
|
Sep 28 2009, 02:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
most likely not because your attenuation is high...
increaseing DSLAM data rate will further increase your attenuation. best is ask a TM technician to check for you ; ) |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 2 2009, 07:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(gsan @ Oct 1 2009, 11:59 PM) can anyone 4mbps use do the speedtest on all ther china server and post the result at there? because i'm going to show TM that not the china website problem but is THEM! thanks! Speedtest.net only has a few China severs, it will be highly unlikly the site you are going to visit is at the same location with the speedtest servers.I would say do a traceroute using Pingplotter freeware and see where the problem lies. Most of the time it would be TM's poor IP routings tho. IMO, there is nothing you can do about it unless they change the routing for your IP range. Mind sharing what website you are facing problem? I'm locked in 218.111.4.XXX / 218.111.5.XXX. Maybe we can do a comparison between our IP ranges? |
|
|
Oct 6 2009, 10:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
Tonight 218.111.4.XXX is screwed, 60ms pings to lowyat forum and 130+ms to Youtube. Ususally 9ms to lowyat
edit. I'm wondering should i complain? This is not the first time 218.111.4 is slow at night. And it seems that I'm locked on to 218.111.4 only... This post has been edited by andrew9292: Oct 7 2009, 09:18 AM |
|
|
Oct 7 2009, 09:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(HiT-AbLe @ Oct 6 2009, 10:51 PM) andrew if u try to ping TMnut DNS(202.188.0.133) I guess u'll get the 60+ms ping as well, it seemed that TMnut DNS is screwed up for past 2 days. I'm in PJ Kota Damansara, upgrading here?Last night is the worst, when I disconnected and reconnected again, I kept on getting invalid login/password. Call CS and have been told that my area is "upgrading" now, then told me it'll be finished by today, end up today problem still remain the same. I see, but for me things seem fine in the morning, only after 7 or 8pm things slow down but still acceptable. Yesterday's slowdown was worst, cant even watch Youtube without buffering. Now things seem fine tho  |
|
|
Oct 9 2009, 02:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
208.111.4 very very very laggy today...
ping times are fine, but speed is like |
|
|
Oct 11 2009, 11:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(boxer07 @ Oct 11 2009, 02:48 PM) anyone here got their own contractor phone no. to fix the wiring ? mind to share wif me ...thx ya You might want to state the area u are in because different contractors/technician are in charge of different areas |
|
|
Oct 16 2009, 09:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(vapeace @ Oct 15 2009, 04:59 PM) i want to ask 3.48mbps is it normal for streamyx 4mbps ??? i just got mine and i ask technician to capped it higher but he say that speed mean your speed ad..... WTF... Mind posting your "Line Status" page and Speedtest results? Need to see your line status to double check the Noise Margins and capped speed...any experience on how to dealt tis problem ? Mis-capping quite common due to TM's lack of control on their "ground technicians" |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 07:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
So far so good here, Kota Damansara area, connected to KLJ exchange 218.111.4.XXX range
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 10 2009, 05:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
okay, now i feel the pinch. running on 218.111.4 / 218.111.5 / 218.111.22 ( I have never got this .22 before )
Latency to USA rise around 50ms+/- BUT speed drop almost 50-70% local region (asia) latency ok, speed dropped. Philippines slow. ( supposedly today is implementation of AAG ) Kota Damansara area. It also seems like all my international speedtest are limited to 1Mbps! I dont think it's just wangsa maju and melawati area problem... This post has been edited by andrew9292: Nov 10 2009, 05:21 PM |
|
|
Nov 10 2009, 06:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
I wonder what is the real cause. Maintenance at Exchange should not affect international routings....
|
|
|
Nov 10 2009, 07:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
I'll give it a few days since they are trying to implement AAG ; )
This post has been edited by andrew9292: Nov 10 2009, 07:04 PM |
|
|
Nov 11 2009, 06:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
^ Same thing here. Confirm it's some kind of capping system or bandwidth distribution. All international links are limited to 1mbps to almost all of us here.
Why? What is the reason behind this? Just tested a 1.5mbps account on 118.XXX IP at another house @ SS2. It was able to achieve full speed to international (Los Angeles, New York, London). This post has been edited by andrew9292: Nov 11 2009, 06:51 PM |
|
|
Nov 11 2009, 10:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
International
    LOCAL region    This post has been edited by andrew9292: Nov 11 2009, 10:46 PM |
|
|
Nov 12 2009, 09:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
I cant even speedtest tonight. Speedtest.net and Speedtest.TM also same,
pings are still okay for local (<80ms) acceptable but somehow the speedtest keep lagging. for example rise to 0.4mbps, then drop to 0.2 or 0.1, then slowly rise to 0.2 then stuck there. after one minute move abit again. loading webpages need to refresh several times. checked DNS all fine, switch DNS also same. check ping times to websites also within normal parameters, just slightly higher than normal around +-50ms use proxy just slight improvement. gila punya. i'm busy with examinations so TM is lucky this time... CODE Target Name: www.youtube.com IP: 74.125.153.139 Date/Time: 12/11/2009 21:59:12 to 12/11/2009 21:59:21 1 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms [192.168.0.1] 2 * * 24 ms * * * 107 ms 37 ms * * [219.93.218.177] 3 34 ms * 37 ms * 9 ms 54 ms * 22 ms 12 ms 63 ms [219.93.216.173] 4 * 32 ms 37 ms * 11 ms N/A 125 ms * N/A 52 ms [10.55.32.108] 5 34 ms 43 ms 27 ms 68 ms 37 ms 62 ms 111 ms 51 ms 29 ms 59 ms [58.27.106.234] 6 31 ms 53 ms 41 ms 65 ms 36 ms 95 ms 122 ms 25 ms 34 ms 46 ms [74.125.50.229] 7 27 ms 43 ms 86 ms 63 ms 37 ms 89 ms 135 ms 52 ms 27 ms * [209.85.243.156] 8 68 ms 73 ms 69 ms 120 ms 101 ms 97 ms 175 ms 82 ms 73 ms * [209.85.241.221] 9 160 ms N/A N/A 114 ms N/A 112 ms N/A 75 ms N/A 69 ms [209.85.250.103] 10 81 ms 88 ms N/A N/A N/A N/A 160 ms 84 ms N/A 87 ms [72.14.233.102] 11 75 ms 81 ms 79 ms * 115 ms 93 ms 165 ms 76 ms 73 ms 69 ms ty-in-f139.1e100.net [74.125.153.139] Traceroute shows around 70% PL for 2nd hop and around 40% for 3rd and 4th hop... 2nd test! 500ms plus to 2nd hop! crazy! and the ping gets higher and higher. takes average 800ms to reach facebook. Almost impossible for browsing. CODE Target Name: www.facebook.com IP: 69.63.181.12 Date/Time: 12/11/2009 22:02:51 to 12/11/2009 22:03:00 1 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms [192.168.0.1] 2 382 ms 490 ms * * * * * * * 659 ms [219.93.218.177] 3 382 ms 483 ms 455 ms * 524 ms 583 ms 751 ms 700 ms 725 ms 645 ms [219.93.216.165] 4 390 ms N/A N/A 464 ms N/A N/A 766 ms N/A N/A 637 ms [10.55.32.126] 5 681 ms * 606 ms 615 ms N/A N/A N/A N/A 841 ms 767 ms [219.94.9.178] 6 863 ms * * 795 ms 1116 ms 1234 ms 1225 ms 1297 ms 1130 ms 968 ms ge-7-16.car3.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.71.140.13] 7 849 ms 854 ms 788 ms 809 ms * * 1140 ms * 981 ms * ae-93-90.ebr3.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.69.144.244] 8 * 833 ms 770 ms * 927 ms * 1168 ms 1099 ms 965 ms 935 ms ae-2.ebr3.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.69.132.9] 9 854 ms 850 ms 777 ms * 984 ms * 1153 ms * 974 ms * ae-63-63.csw1.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.69.134.226] 10 891 ms 832 ms 781 ms 840 ms 960 ms 1093 ms 1130 ms 1083 ms 978 ms 910 ms ae-14-69.car4.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.68.18.6] 11 * 772 ms 694 ms 745 ms 880 ms 988 ms 1090 ms * 903 ms * FACEBOOK-IN.car4.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.71.114.122] 12 * 773 ms 715 ms * 915 ms * 1087 ms * 892 ms * ae1.bb01.sjc1.tfbnw.net [74.119.76.23] 13 * 742 ms 702 ms 767 ms 924 ms 995 ms 1063 ms 1014 ms 917 ms 858 ms ae4.br02.snc1.tfbnw.net [74.119.76.26] 14 788 ms 721 ms 698 ms 744 ms * 1003 ms 1068 ms 1030 ms 900 ms 848 ms eth-18-1.csw01a.snc2.tfbnw.net [204.15.21.35] 15 777 ms 733 ms 712 ms 776 ms 903 ms 1027 ms 1048 ms 995 ms 941 ms 882 ms www-11-01-snc2.facebook.com [69.63.181.12] This post has been edited by andrew9292: Nov 12 2009, 10:54 PM |
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 12:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
|
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya
|
Something is wrong here, youtube latency is very low, suggesting a local server. But i still cannot stream with full speed on it.
My guess is they are setting up a local youtube mirror, but as usual..... Maybe they just need some time in setting it up... (i would like to believe in this) CODE Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Andrew>ping www.youtube.com Pinging youtube-ui.l.google.com [64.233.181.138] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.181.138: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=55 Reply from 64.233.181.138: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=55 Reply from 64.233.181.138: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=55 Reply from 64.233.181.138: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=55 Ping statistics for 64.233.181.138: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 13ms, Maximum = 15ms, Average = 13ms CODE Target Name: www.youtube.com IP: 64.233.181.113 Date/Time: 24/11/2009 12:08:42 1 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms [192.168.0.1] 2 10 ms * 9 ms * 12 ms [219.93.218.177] 3 13 ms 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms 7 ms [219.93.216.173] 4 27 ms N/A N/A N/A 12 ms [10.55.32.128] 5 12 ms 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms 9 ms [58.27.105.158] 6 11 ms 9 ms 12 ms 13 ms 12 ms [209.85.242.236] 7 12 ms 27 ms N/A N/A 14 ms [209.85.242.125] 8 19 ms 31 ms 19 ms N/A 20 ms [209.85.243.146] 9 N/A N/A 14 ms 11 ms 12 ms [74.125.206.134] 10 12 ms 12 ms 10 ms 11 ms 11 ms ni-in-f113.1e100.net [64.233.181.113] Ping statistics for www.youtube.com Packets: Sent = 5, Received = 5, Lost = 0 (0.0%) Round Trip Times: Minimum = 10ms, Maximum = 12ms, Average = 11ms Can others confirm of the new routing and server? ... hopefully this will be the beginning of a hyper fast streaming system ; ) This post has been edited by andrew9292: Nov 24 2009, 12:12 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0459sec
 0.26
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 01:24 AM |
Quote