And how if Chelsea won the EPL? Even if MU became the champion, and Chelsea 2nd with only 2 or 3 points back, I think Chelsea players deserve more than 1 player compare to 8 by MU. It's like the whole EPL teams against Chelsea and thats not so professional if you take the emotion into account not the performance.

Ok, I can take it if people said MU midfielders and strikers are better than Chelsea. Or if they said our forwards was crap except Drogba. But, how about our back four including Petr Cech? Ask Sir Alex Ferguson or any MU players and fans - do you want to swap Petr Cech with Van Der Sar? Stastically, MU goals scored superior than Chelsea (78 - 60) but Chelsea goals against is better than MU (20 - 24).

Noone mention about Drogba's contribution to our back four especially when our opponents take corners or set pieces against us. He won most of the aerial battle inside our own penalty box.

Yup, 1 2nd that. As long as the arguments is healthy, it's good actually. I like to read as it gives me more info about other clubs or other players. I have no complaint about Ronaldo as he's been fantastic throughout the season and he's a popular choice. But, I still can't get it how out of 11 players, 8 came out from MU. The different between MU, Chelsea, Liverpool and Arsenal is not that superior IMO. And regarding Carragher, it's like John Terry for Chelsea. They're both inspirational for the club. Chelsea suffer a lot without Terry's around. Not for his skill but more to his leadership and his spirit.