what do you think after google aset kayamas. The Harmony can buy or not?

Google and see it for your self from the Google review.. this is 1 of many

yea, i saw this comment on google reviews too, but actually the brochure write propose maintenance price per sqft, not the fixed price, cant really blame the developer

This post has been edited by windtwc: Apr 14 2021, 03:33 PM

Harmony open for sale do pm if interested

Grab this last opportunity before HOC ended and feel free to ask me anything about this Harmony !!!

Block A facing East already almost fully booked.

mine still in process. idk what process. haiya.
kejap ask for kwsp slip, kejap latest payslip.
aiyo.

Calling them a developer is an understatement. They are merely a mass apartment builder. Same plan and layout recycle for almost each and every of their project. But hey, you get what you pay.

You pay them RM400-500k at this location then it is only fair to expect nothing out of ordinary product. Some funny folks, buy house from Aset Kayamas but use Ecoworld as the bar when comparing. And it not like Ecoworld is flawless to begin with.

Calling them a developer is an ***overstatement***

agent of riamas pls pm me

Sorry to interrupt , i have some different point on this issue . My point of view the proposed maintenance fees should not change as owner have agree with developer during signing s&p with this rate . The charges should be indicate in your S&P , under Fifth schedule ( clause 19 ) . Developer should not change the fees before VP and 1 st year during developer management period as they are agreed and estimate the maintenance fees in early . Even the propose fees not enough cover , developer should comply for it as this is their offer during signing S&P in early stage and owner accept it already . The management fees can advise to amend after developer handover to JMB in 1st AGM when developer have done his responsible under HDA act and strata management act 757 .

any unit left for Block A? Leasehold how many years balance?

pm for more options in OKR

Some SPA not stated maintenance fee that's why.

My opinion , if not state in S&P than i have doubt the developer have comply according HDA ACT requirement ? I will suggest make complaint to KPKT and COB or get justice by Tribunal before end of 1st year after CCC date . This may can make complain to bar council as well . In another point of view , since maintenance fee not stated in S&P , May I consider is FREE maintenance fee by developer in 1st year during developer management period ? By law , developer should provide according HDA Act . If consider in free maintenance fee this point , i believe purchaser will not question it if developer cover the cost in their management period . If not free , than developer should to justify according HDA act and provide reasonable explanation why not follow promised early maintenance rate to purchaser . If purchaser can accept it than no more issue .

This post has been edited by fishangler88: Aug 11 2021, 05:56 PM

Who gives a crap? The distance between petalz to millerz square still the same with the distance from bloomsvale although petalz is in Okr. If the distance is the same and it’s rm300 cheaper psf, maybe you are the noob who can’t see the reason people choose jalan puchong.

Although okr is more expensive and nearer to MV. But the disadvantage is have to u turn sometime and stuck in the jam using the okr. Jalan Puchong although not so near to MV, but it has easy access to sunway, Puchong, Bukit jalil , oug and etc. Jalan Puchong has it advantage + cheaper price.

Harmony or Kuchai Sentral hmmm

Contemplating between this and EdgeWood Sky Sanctuary. Comes down to ease of accessibility (traffic jam), build quality and future potential of the property (including current rrnrt and future density around the area)