i think it is more to 4-2-4
2. Salah thrives in attacking midfield
Jurgen Klopp has generally deployed a 4-3-3 system at Liverpool since the start of last season, but on Saturday he tweaked his formation, fielding 4-2-3-1 and handed a different role to Salah, his side's best performer so far this campaign.
Whereas one would have expected Oxlade-Chamberlain to start in the central midfield role he supposedly wants to play alongside Emre Can and Georginio Wijnaldum, instead he was deployed in a more customary right-sided midfield role. Mane played to the left and Roberto Firmino led the line, which resulted in Salah playing as number 10, theoretically bridging the gap between midfield and attack.
"Theoretically" is the key word because in reality, Salah played more like a second centre-forward, and in possession, Liverpool seemed more like a 4-2-4, albeit with Mane and Oxlade-Chamberlain both regularly drifting infield. It was a slightly disjointed system, and while Salah is a tremendous counterattacking number 10 -- his performances for Fiorentina in that role were genuinely sensational -- it remains to be seen whether he has the intelligence to vary his position, drop into midfield and help Liverpool to play the type of passing triangle that unlocked Maribor in midweek for Can's excellent goal.
Salah stayed rather too high up the pitch, with he and Firmino playing into the hands of West Ham's three-man defence. What Liverpool surely required was someone who could drop off, create three-against-two situations in midfield to bypass Noble and Pedro Obiang. That's not really in Salah's nature, but both Firmino and Mane made more significant darts into those zones.
This looked set to be the game's key tactical battle: could Salah help Liverpool break down a deep defence? Two early goals from set-pieces, though, meant Liverpool didn't need to prove themselves dangerous in open play.
http://www.espnfcasia.com/blog/the-match/6...win-vs-west-ham