Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 What's your monthly expenses

views
     
MeToo
post Jul 25 2018, 11:32 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
I actually do not understand why people tend to think.

Poor kid = Street smart, innovative, go getter, hardworking, <insert any good quality>

Rich kid = Dumb, lazy, sloth, only relying on parents etc etc

I really dont see how this kind of stereotype comes about. For all we know. the rich guy might be the one with all the good qualities while the poor kid has all the bad qualities.

I personally have some very rich friends, I'm talkign private jets kinda rich. And they are not rich lazy snobs that everyone assume them to be, but maybe people tend to have that kinda perception cause they are not close to these people... and i dont blame them cause they do not easily allow people to enter their inner circle of friends..

This post has been edited by MeToo: Jul 25 2018, 11:36 AM
MeToo
post Jul 25 2018, 11:52 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(cynthusc @ Jul 25 2018, 11:42 AM)
First of all...I am comparing apple to apple. They are all graduates. Regardless of which university they come from. Many come from UK universities where their parents have paid for their education in total. Many have repeated their studies after failing one year or more.

Parents drove these kids to take these degrees not because they are interested but because that is what their parents want. A child with a degree.  If my daughter wants to be a doctor and has the ability to study and get the necessary grades to achieve her dream then she will definitely find a way. But if she gets mediocre results I am not gonna spend 1 million just to put a piece of paper in her hands. That just means that is not for her. She is bound for other things in life. Simple as that.

BTW if my daughter gets accepted into Harvard, she won't need my money. She will definitely get a scholarship.
*
So in summary.

1. If your daughter is unable to get the funds,, then her dream of being a doctor will be crushed, despite she having the academic capability.

2. If she gets accepted to Harvard, but without a scholarship, she can forget about it and find a local Uni instead.

Well, if your choice is tough love, then so be it, to each their own.

I would liek to say i will not be subscribing to your method. If my children is in the above 2 scenario, they WILL be a doctor/harvard graduate.

ps : As to your claim of "definitely will", well... i'm glad you can definitely predict the future.
MeToo
post Jul 25 2018, 11:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(cynthusc @ Jul 25 2018, 11:45 AM)
Also those who came to work for me and did not cut it, many from universities such as Manchester, Liverpool etc. The two that have stayed on permanently, one is from a local university and the other is from a twinning college. Both have one thing in common: They came from difficult family backgrounds and really wanted it.
*
Have you considered that perhaps the cream of the crop didnt choose to apply for a job with you?

Anyway, it seems we have drifted quite far away form "Finance,Business,Investment" so I'll leave this as it is.
MeToo
post Jul 25 2018, 12:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(cherroy @ Jul 25 2018, 11:53 AM)
1) As said, if the kid is indeed brilliant, no problem to spend big.
But if the kid can enroll into Harvard, it should be no problem to get some scholarship, funding required, no need to spend as big.

2) Without a degree, the kid may need to work hard and may willing to accept anything in their path, instead of mindset I have a xyz degree, I won't do this do that or tell me to do this job as degree holder, no way or too little salary as degree holder.

3) B40 may not have a degree due to no rich FAMA to support them in the first place. Even those degree holder is jobless, they won't become B40 due to rich FAMA. Nowadays you have money, you have a degree already.

4) The point is degree has nothing to do with this. We are not talking of total uneducated, we are talking using money to push the kid to get a degree instead finish school with SPM or diploma.
In fact, the jobless stat is higher with an ordinary degree than ordinary a skillman.

Fundamentally, we are not comparing total uneducated vs degree holder.
I am more towards discussion whether to support the kid to go for an ordinary degree by spending big money, or just let the kid finish their diploma or Vokansional school at cheaper version or let the kid build up their path according to their strength.
*
1. I thought that has been what I was saying all along, if the kid have the capability, I will spend to fulfill her dreams.
As for the misconception of "Harvard sure got scholarship", only about 20~25% of the students there pays zero, the rest have to pay something... and something (including boarding/living expenses) will not be cheap.

2. Again, its a matter of the person's attitude. Also, i dont see the advanatage of "accepting anything" to "picking the best offers out there".

3. I miss the point you're trying to make.

4. I must have misunderstood you when you said

QUOTE(cherroy @ Jul 25 2018, 11:13 AM)
My view,
If 1M is not enough for the education cost, then might as well drop the idea. <--- so yes or no to education?

Kids need to learn how to gather education fund themselves, it is process of growing up. <--- so they cannot find funds no educaiton to them?
If the kid indeed brilliant in study, there are various scholarship and channels to fund the education nowadays, may not need as much as that.

Nowadays, getting a ordinary degree is no longer a career path guaranteed, which in return may "trap" themselves in career path. <--- so we dont need a degree?

<snip>
*
MeToo
post Jul 25 2018, 12:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(cynthusc @ Jul 25 2018, 12:00 PM)
Eh just like not all poor kids are hardworking, not all rich kids are lazy but rich kids did not make their money. Their parents or family did. My maternal side  I have rich cousins....no private jets but they take 1st Class. My uncle probably earns RM500K a month. They are all working with my uncle in his company and have degrees from UK universities paid for by my uncle. My cousins have to work for my uncle because they can't earn as much as him and of course they need to inherit the business. Are they lazy...not more than others but they definitely don't have to work too hard for their money. Also my uncle has to constantly hire outside help including yours truly because my cousins aren't capable enough to run the company yet.

My daughter does not have that inheritance like my cousins. So she has to work hard. If she wants more then she will work hard and achieve her dreams.
*
But our differing views stem form the initial fact that i am of the opinion that I've prepared a fund for my child's education if and when she needs it.

While you are of the views that if your child cannot pay for her own education, she will be thrown to the dogs and thats that.

So, if both our daughter is academically proficient enough to get accepted to Harvard, and they both managed to get scholarship, then they both end up there.

While if both of them failed ot get a scholarship (no matter the reason), only mine will manage to go cause her parents is ready to supoort her, while yours will have to find a spot in the local U.

Is this correct?

ps : Pls dont start with "poor will work harder, rich will be lazy" that is the kind of assumption with no basis whatsoever.
MeToo
post Jul 25 2018, 12:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(cynthusc @ Jul 25 2018, 12:07 PM)
1. If she has the academic ability she will get the funds. No academic ability but dream to be doctor, won't get funds from me

2. If can get into Harvard, sure will get funds (you should know this lar. I also got offer from Kings College, full ride)

3. Good luck to you lar...your son/daughter get 2 As want to be doctor and get into Harvard (which is totally impossible as to get into Harvard a perfect score is a given) then you pay lar 1 million. If fail first year because cannot pass then you pay another 1 million lor. Maybe can enter Pseudo-Harvard or Paper Mill University...then you can pay another 1 million
*
1. Again there is no basis "she has academic ability she will get the funds". Atleast you clarified no funds no education.

2. See above. Grats on your scholarship, alrdy mention 20% of those in harvard gets full scholarship, if your daughter is in the other 80%, well, local Malaysian U is quite good as well.

3. Again groundless assumption. I'm sure there are better ways to "try" to put your points across without assuming stupidity in others.
MeToo
post Jul 25 2018, 12:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(cynthusc @ Jul 25 2018, 12:11 PM)
You also never read properly. Fail to get scholarship means not good enough lar. Haiyo....do something else lar. I still subsidise 30% mah.
*
Fail to get scholarship means not good enuf?

SO I suppose more then half of all those in Harvard, Oxford, MIT, Cambridge etc etc are not good enough.

Ok, I'm sure you are the foremost authority in this subject, being a king's scholar and all. thumbsup.gif
MeToo
post Jul 25 2018, 12:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(cynthusc @ Jul 25 2018, 12:15 PM)
1. If she has academic ability why no funds??? If she gets straight As she will get funds. I did. If get mediocre results then why I want to pay 1 million to send her overseas?

2. Sorry you don't know much about Harvard right? Every Malaysian that got into Harvard had a scholarship..

3. What to do? You only choose to read what you want and make assumptions. Sometimes we have to assume stupidity when it is staring at you in the face
*
1. Ahh, the old "if I can why she cannot argument". Also, I'm sure you can show that every student who got straight A's in malaysia will get a scholarship to Harvard (or its equivalent)... right?

2. You are also the foremost authority in Harvard admission? I'm sure you can substantiate your assertion that "Every malaysian that got into Harvard had a scholarship" ... right?

3. Ah yes, when all else fails, resort to personal attacks, calling the other guy stupid is also a plus. I can see you are clearly highly educated. thumbsup.gif
MeToo
post Jul 25 2018, 12:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(cynthusc @ Jul 25 2018, 12:17 PM)
Clearly you don't know anything about academic admissions. You better get to know more. If your kid scores straight As you can save your 1 million.
*
Notice you made lots of wide encompassing statements, but failed substantiate any of them.

MeToo
post Jul 25 2018, 12:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(cynthusc @ Jul 25 2018, 12:26 PM)
1&2 Seek and you shall find. Don't be lazy.

3. What to do? a degrading post deserves a degrading response.
*
You make a statement, substantiate it. That is the basic premise of a discussion. But apparently you failed to even understand that.

So basically you have no facts and just pulling statements out of thin air?

I think its pointless to continue discussing this topic with someone as obstinate as this.

Since this have, once again, drifted away from purpose of this thread/section, i'll agree to disagree and this will be my last response to you on this issue.
MeToo
post Sep 4 2018, 11:39 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(vincabby @ Sep 4 2018, 11:35 AM)
he did say before he drove at a speed that people want to horn and punch him to save fuel and money. so go figure. his ideas are very personal as in it works for him but i think most can't really use for themselves.
*
Contrary to popular believe, driving slowly doesnt save fuel. Every car there is a sweet spot for the best fuel efficiency, and 40kmh is almost never it.

Edit : And if he has to go to such lengths to save a few dollars of petrol, go buy a kancil or use a bike.

This post has been edited by MeToo: Sep 4 2018, 11:39 AM
MeToo
post Sep 4 2018, 11:43 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(Showtime747 @ Sep 4 2018, 08:16 AM)
Since we are talking about extreme, it is only fair we see the other side of the scale. Following is NOT even talking about those billionaire type of expenses

Let’s break it down shall we ?
Monthly expenses include living in multiple countries during the month, so multiple houses, cars, everything...
Telco expense ~RM1k
Internet ~RM1.3k
Petrol ~RM5k
Water ~RM2k
Electricity ~RM10k
Food and stuff (home) ~RM8k
Dining out ~RM10k
Plane ticket ~RM60k
Houses maintenance ~RM20k
Cars maintenance ~RM15k
Healthcare insurance company pays
Personal and wife grooming ~RM15k
Shopping (wife’s, gadgets, electrical) depending on mood ~RM30k
Hobby (golf, flying, wine, audiophile, photography, sports equipments) RM30k
Ad-hoc (buy new car, holiday house, watches, antique) etc fluctuates
No loans, so don’t have installment to pay

Source : business and investment income.
Note : above numbers are from “my friend”
*
its all good until I read the last line "No loans"...

Er... personally I dont know a millionaire (and above) that doesnt have a few outstanding loans. Using cash for everything is not making the best use of you money. So for those who have 7 digit and above networth and claim to be debt free, I always take it with a bucket full of salt.
MeToo
post Sep 4 2018, 11:46 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(vincabby @ Sep 4 2018, 11:43 AM)
he is using a kancil. however, to help you understand him a bit more, at fundsupermart threads years back, he took a bus to singapore just to get a cheaper bank account there for investment or something like that. So, he will use money when it's needed to. Also same reactions, people say why waste money take bus and time, go there to save the account fees but he feels worth it. He is pretty radical so just take his ideas as, he still lives, so it still works for him, so far.
*
Yeah, I came across a few of his post, he is almost at the same standard as that Nachiino Etamay guy, almost at ridiculously unbelievable levels.

But one can also argue that what he is doing right now is considered "living". I dont know of anyone getting rich form "saving money", its almost always better to earn more and invest wisely.
MeToo
post Sep 4 2018, 11:50 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(yoonyin @ Sep 4 2018, 10:35 AM)
Just sharing. Currently loaded with all the housing loan and breathless! Hope my 1st house can sell out ASAP.

House 1 = 2.4k
House 2 = 2.9k
House 1 maintenance = 250
Utilities = 120
Insurance = 250 (personal) + 200 (Child) + 200 (House MLTA insurance) + 100 (parent)
Childcare = 900
For parent = 500
Transportation fare = 500
Monthly groceries = 150
Food & Beverage (spend on weekend only, weekday covered by parent homecook) =  250
Hotlink prepaid = 35

Total = around 8.5k (FIXED)

Currently no saving, only got a fixed deposit in my bank that annually can give me extra 4k. Other expenses will shared by my wife, like baby formula milk, dryper, car petrol, so not listed in to my expenses.
*
Bro, what kind of insurance is this? Medical is fine. But buying life insurance for children is not recommended.
MeToo
post Sep 4 2018, 11:56 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(Nachiino Etamay @ Sep 4 2018, 11:50 AM)
Why me?

To me,  life is about TIME, MONEY, SOUL.

i dont have a car because car is a waste of time. a waste of money, and a waste of soul.

on a bus, i still can study japanese, read manga, hence 1 hour on a bus, i can still have 1 hour of life

20 minutes on a car = 20 minutes complaint about jam = 20 minutes life lost and soul lost cuz now ur more stressful.

20 minutes of bicycle is even better = 20 minutes cut from gym time = 0 minutes life lost.

for everything: calculate X minutes life lost, MYR cost, and soul cost.

life lost = time lost not doing anything that either makes money OR something you enjoy OR something with a long term goal (ie:gym, exercise, self improvement)

money lost = Ringgit cost of something

soul lost = extra stress for doing something you dont like.
*
Oh I didnt know about your above stuff.

I just kinda recall some of your more.. er.. radical food expenses (or rather savings).
MeToo
post Sep 4 2018, 11:58 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(sunami @ Sep 4 2018, 11:50 AM)
kinda risky when u said no saving....
anything happen on your job or your wife...
gg
*
SHould be ok la... he got nearly 100k in his bank in cash.

His expenses is 8.5k.

So his savings will last his family around 1 yr of zero income.

Considering he and wife both working, chances of both losing their job at the same time is slim.
MeToo
post Sep 4 2018, 12:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(sky18 @ Sep 4 2018, 12:10 PM)
I believe "his friend" at least close to 8 figures NW or above.

Btw, we had accept the "personal finance" is vary among ppl. there are exist 7 figures folks dont have any outstanding debt. it just a matter of preference and no right or wrong. Some of them are very good in boosting their earning, some may super frugal in spending, and other excel in investment.

To me, we had to agree to disagree as everyone have different context, personal strenght and past experience which form their unique way / view on "personal finance";

It just wasting time & effort to force own beliefs onto others; similiar to you can't help someone who doesn't want to be helped.
*
Hence I say a bucket of salt.

Usually the higher the NW of an individual, the more likely he will have access to financial tools (or atleast a financial planner if he is ignorant in such things). Being debt free does not make financial sense, those are middle class pipe dreams.
MeToo
post Sep 4 2018, 12:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(yoonyin @ Sep 4 2018, 12:27 PM)
250 is my personal medical with investment link, 200 is my child medical insurance, all separate policy, different company. Just unfortunately, due to tight budget, my wife insurance have to pay by herself, around 300.
Yea, only hit the NO SAVING period this month due to my second home start paying installment. Have been saving for my entire life (32yo now), now got around 200K sitting in FD just in case anything happen, then have to use the fund. If nothing goes wrong, still get use the 200k FD generate Rm4k++ at year end for vacation.

As for now, just pray my apartment got interest buyer lo, or someone want to rent it.
*
200k FD only 4k interest a year?

Minimum should be netting 8k bro... FD rates are easily 4%+ for upto 12 month term
MeToo
post Sep 4 2018, 12:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(imnotabot @ Sep 4 2018, 12:43 PM)
Come on guys, it really depends on your financial goal lah.

Some people accumulate wealth so that they get to live like millionaires, living in huge houses, drive expensive cars, eat at expensive restaurants.

Some other people accumulate wealth just to achieve financial independence: not having to work to live. So they accumulate wealth up to a point, stop working, and continue living the same lifestyle until the end. This can be achieved without relying on debt. In case you're not familiar with this approach, I suggest reading blog posts by a guy famous for it, Mr. Money Mustache.

There's nothing wrong with both approach. To each his own.
*
You accumulate wealth to a point where you can comfortably let yoru money work for you (i.e. investment to grow your wealth). Thats the way to achieve financial independence. How keeping under the pillow and drawing it down perpetually...
MeToo
post Sep 4 2018, 12:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,338 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(imnotabot @ Sep 4 2018, 12:49 PM)
Exactly. The different is that for the second approach, you don't need high-risk investment. You save as much as possible and stash it in a low-risk investment. In 10-15 years you can stop working. Of course this only works if you live a cheap lifestyle. So it's up to you.
*
The bolded part is the usual problem with "retirement".

When we retire, we are at the absolute PEAK of our career, which translate into maximum earning potential.

Hence our lifestyle tend to reflect that. Say you retire when you are earning 50k a month, can you really continue to "enjoy" your 50k a month lifestyle for the rest of your life? Highly unlikely, hence people's lifestyle take a hit and their retirement is unhappy.

That is also why people these days tend to delay their retire into their 60s... to hang on to that peak for as long as possible.

3 Pages < 1 2 3 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0214sec    0.94    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 07:26 AM