QUOTE(pipedream @ Apr 2 2007, 06:11 PM)
Rofl, waiting for M$ to coming out with a un-BUGGY version will be like waiting for money to drop from the sky
Pros of vista
Beautiful eye catching design (providing u have a GC that support PS2.0)
Better security
Programs (IE7, Bitlocker(ultimate), dreamscene(ultimate), WMP11, Media Center(home premium and above)
Cons of vista
less compatible with a lot program
memory eatingPros of WinXP
more compatible with current program
less memory consumingcan upgrade to vista look (http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/424533 (credits to J-Slade))
Cons of WinXP
Fugly (unless u upgrade to vista look)
less secure
thats all i can think of
I beg to differ on that issue. What IS really memory consuming? If the less memory it uses the better, than what is the reason you buy all of that memory in the first place. I forgot where I read it, but the best OS if it ever exist will use 99% of the memory available and use that accordingly to the program it needed. While you might think that Vista is using more memories, it's actually using it to make program go faster using superfetch. considering XP vs Vista in memory issues, XP waste more ram than Vista, as every used RAM allocation you see in Vista is not wasted compared to XP.
On the looks, Vista will use less resources compared to XP on the same rig with the same looks. Thus why even bother using transformation pack on XP when in reality you are making it slower than if you're natively using vista?
Syahid: no offence dude, this IS a vista thread, and we don't really f***ing care what OS you use.