Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 is this correct

views
     
greyPJ
post Mar 7 2007, 07:29 AM

artificially stupid
*******
Senior Member
3,169 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(azarimy @ Mar 6 2007, 11:04 PM)
**Grammar Police mode ON**

You are wrong. The original sentence is correct. The instance of having an 's' as a result of something being singular does not apply here.

"Let the job look for you" is correct, and not "Let the job looks for you".

"She won't look for you" is correct, and not "She won't looks for you".
*
haha ok, let is the verb here. sorry.

jenjob.com: where the job looks for you.

is better.
SUSDrifter
post Mar 7 2007, 08:50 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,349 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


QUOTE(greyPJ @ Mar 6 2007, 10:52 PM)
where got ok? thats wrong already, should be:

let the job looks for you

with s.


Added on March 6, 2007, 10:54 pm
wah lau eh, you talk what? you invent those rules yourself?
*
this is what i have in mind

QUOTE(azarimy @ Mar 6 2007, 11:04 PM)
**Grammar Police mode ON**

You are wrong. The original sentence is correct. The instance of having an 's' as a result of something being singular does not apply here.

"Let the job look for you" is correct, and not "Let the job looks for you".

"She won't look for you" is correct, and not "She won't looks for you".
*
ok, i learn soemthing new today

QUOTE(marxmannn @ Mar 6 2007, 11:34 PM)
people... the key here is the word "let"... after the word "let" always use the "root" form of verb.

one common example: Let her go. (versus let her goes)
*
ok, noted. damn my grammer downs the drain

QUOTE(kwh1989 @ Mar 6 2007, 11:44 PM)
ya, it's correct, Let the job look for u. double verbs together. it is the same as Make him cry
*
btw, feel free to correct my english. i dun mind that as i will be the 1 benefitted

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0146sec    0.38    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 03:35 AM