quite easy to compare.
Compare the feeder fund management fees and the main fund management fees. I'm pretty sure it is in the prospectus somewhere.
The difference is the feeder fund profit %.

Don't understand what it means by at fund level.

At the main fund level or at the feeder fund level?

It is mentioned that you are charged once, but doesn't mean it will be charged the same as the master fund.
It wasn't very clear in the prospectus.

eg:- master fund 1.5% expense, feeder fund 2%,


feeder fund profit 0.5%/annum.

deleted. Repeat.

This post has been edited by Drian: Jul 14 2017, 03:43 PM

Quick look At the MER management expense ratio from annnual report for TA Global tech is 2% per annum which is not the same as the master fund(henderson horizon global technology fund.)


Maybe someone from FSM can shed some light.

judging from previous election , najib tends to wait for the very last minute.

You have a lot of faith in Malaysia equity?

It's tedious to track irr if your periodically investing

Nobody here went for the talk a few days ago?
Can give a short summary?
I'm planning to go to the penang one end of this month.

As we're approaching the 10 year economic cycle, probably want to play a little bit more defensive next year.
I'm curious to know what funds does well when equities are not doing well.

I don't see what's the problem , if someone wants to boast let them boast , it's their money not yours.

However points to ponder, bill gates, warren buffet or say 10 million ringgit networth individuals, all are millions of times richer but none of them boast on the internet.

That is more "business" than boasting.

TA european?
Global Tech is not in the list.

From the fund factsheet , top 3 countries it invest to is US , Japan and Europe.
But this fund just meet the benchmark , didn't really beat it.
Better to get also an asia ex japan fund.

Benchmark here refers to fund benchmark which is the internal fund benchmark

Benchmark 42% S&P500 + 36% MSCI Europe + 12%
MSCI Japan + 10% CIMB Bank 1-Month Fixed Deposit Rate

It trends very closely with each other, so it's not beating the benchmark.

when did you buy your managed portfolio?
want to compare with mine as well

3% for me , but without sales charge you would have made 3.67% so ya I got beaten too.

Question is not whether you should put in bond but whether at what % of your portfolio should be bond.
You can put it at 5% which doesn't really make much of a difference.

Personally i'm now at 70% equity 15% REITS 15% bond.

This post has been edited by Drian: Jul 28 2017, 09:13 AM

I would argue that you cannot put large enough sums into it immediately.

Went to the penang talk yesterday.
Wasn't too impressed with AMAsia REITS asset allocation.
More countries yes but places like Japan? I don't know , doesn't sound like rental yields are high there.
There was this guy who asked why there is so much cash 18-20% and I don't think I got a good explanation from the fund manger.
It sounded like they couldn't find any good opportunity and therefore not do anything about their money. Imagine 20% of your money not working for you.