QUOTE(spiderman17 @ Oct 16 2017, 01:20 PM)
What's the reason/thinking behind allocating 1/3 to properties/REITs?
Your allocation in fixed income can provide the retirement income cash flow, while the allocation in business provide growth.
If you're planning on using 3-4% only, you will not even deplete your epf(if you go in 100%)

By the way, what's the minimum portfolio size for your plan to be workable? If you don't hit that sum, where/how would you tweak?

Danke danke for asking / clarifying - makes me think clearly too, to respond clearly

Logic / reasoning for allocation of 1/3 to properties / REITs:
1. What's the reason/thinking behind allocating 1/3 to properties/REITs? Major asset category allocation.
ie traditionally it's just Fixed Income: Equities
However, IMHO, different category of Equities perform very differently - properties/REITs is more of cash-flow investing and "some" capital gains (inflation basis).
Thus, in the context of the 3 categories, it's akin to having:
a. Goal keeper & defenders: Cash+FD+FlexiMortgage & EPF/bonds
b. MidFielders: Properties & REITs
c. Strikers: Running businesses /trading & "normal" shares in businesses
Some other folks think of it as 3 baskets of:
a. Self usage
b. Cash flow investment assets
c. Capital growth investment assets
Same difference kua
2. Your allocation in fixed income can provide the retirement income cash flow, while the allocation in business provide growth.
If you're planning on using 3-4% only, you will not even deplete your epf(if you go in 100%)Heheh - expectation of fluctuations low for Fixed Income is low but total average returns also low - averaging 4%pa (Average of 3%pa Cash,FD,FlexiMortgage & 5%pa EPF/Bonds). All returns are rounded down +all expenses rounded up, prudence/chickenshit concept

Thus, if based on 4%pa average returns for total Fixed Income VS 3%pa to 4%pa draw-down for retirement:
a. can deplete leh, with just 1 or 2 sudden kaka
b. there will be very little, if any, re-investments, thus, inflation how to tackle?,thus will deplete leh
c. my Monte Carlo + standard deviation sim for the above is for my wife & i living up to 100 - if kaput earlier, no problem - no need to eat grass/Alpo. Worse is kaput later than 100.. get what i mean?
Again - i may be at the extreme-er end of prudence / chickenshit concept heheh - seen too many kaka happening to older folks that weren't prepared to re-investing during older age, like good old GST which whacks even retirees. IMHO, GST to current workers/earners - can rebalance lar but retirees..
3. By the way, what's the minimum portfolio size for your plan to be workable? If you don't hit that sum, where/how would you tweak?RM1.6M based on my expected retirement lifestyle of RM4K pm in current value.
ie.
($4K pm expenses *12 months = 1 year's expenses) / 3% draw down = $1.6M
IF i don't hit that sum, then reduce my expenditure planned down to a minimum of $2Kpm of current value lor - survivable with everything paid off +a new cheap car/fridge/washing machine on/off - slightly painful but do-able. Old Chinese saying - Horse die, get down & walk
Note - i'm expecting TOTAL average returns to be 6%pa, thus spend half, re-invest half (to beat inflation & have something worthwhile to give back when kaput)
Why 6%pa?
1/3 * 4%pa Fixed Income = 1.33%pa
+ 1/3 *8%pa Business, Trading, "normal" stocks/equities =2.66%pa
+ 1/3 *6%pa Properties / REITs = 2%pa
= 5.99% total average pa
Hope the above is logical - please feel free to throw logical bricks/batts at it
Note - i'm a pessimistic optimist, ie i believe there can be a better tomorrow by taking into consideration of kakas that can happen
This post has been edited by wongmunkeong: Oct 16 2017, 02:33 PM