Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
AMD Ryzen, AM4 / AM5 Platform
|
marfccy
|
 Feb 25 2017, 03:15 PM
|
|
QUOTE(k!nex @ Feb 25 2017, 02:41 PM) Then wats the point of using a future cpu. Those bulldozer days are built like tht exactly. Invest heavily in multithread performance hoping the market will join the bandwagon, sacrifice single thread. It ended up being a shitty gaming cpu where a puny i3 can defeat an 8 core cpu from amd. Buying computers for 'future proof' is such bad idea to me. You should buy watever is best at that time. Ryzen is marketted as an enthusiast cpu according to the ceo never occur to you there are things out there are people who benefits from the multi threaded option eh? Ryzen is obviously not marketed as "gaming CPU", its to show that the masses can now graduate from the standard 4C8T option and opt for similar to Intel's more cores HEDT perf without breaking the bank it doesnt really matter if Ryzen loses in single threaded, what concerns everyone the most is the fact now everyone can opt for CPU with more multi threading by now |
|
|
|
|
|
marfccy
|
Feb 26 2017, 06:57 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(terrorist @ Feb 26 2017, 10:25 AM) Actually the Wraith Spire cooler on Ryzen 7 1700 is not bad huh   Asrock mobo looks cantttteekk too  ..  Question is, can it keep it cooled to the point 3rd party coolers are no longer necessary?  |
|
|
|
|
|
marfccy
|
Feb 26 2017, 07:02 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(soulfly @ Feb 26 2017, 06:59 PM) stock coolers are always adequate for the standard spec running cpu, unless the stock fan is noisy and you're looking for something quieter but for OC you'll definitely need a 3rd party. Not in the case for my 4790k with stock cooler  I idle at 60C, thermal throttled immediately at 100C with any cpu load (>20% cpu usage) Replaced with noctua l9x65 cooler and no difference in load temps but better idle temps and doesnt overheat as fast Granted im on a mitx case |
|
|
|
|
|
marfccy
|
Feb 26 2017, 07:06 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(soulfly @ Feb 26 2017, 07:04 PM) Ryzen has lower TDP. So it should be okay for a non-X cpu I do hope so, 4790k was rated 88W TDP But i break past 110W on high cpu loads |
|
|
|
|
|
marfccy
|
Feb 26 2017, 07:53 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(TristanX @ Feb 26 2017, 07:25 PM) Got some issue with i7-4790K. You probably need this setting. https://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-23517Yeah i noticed it was something to do with BIOS. However my partial fix wasnt tweaking the BIOS settings I changed the windows power options. Back then i set as maximum, and apparently that caused it to be running at 4.2GHz constantly. Changing to balanced fix it to lowest clockspeed when idle, however i still get real nasty load temps |
|
|
|
|
|
marfccy
|
Mar 20 2017, 09:19 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(k!nex @ Mar 17 2017, 10:39 PM) https://www.overclock3d.net/news/cpu_mainbo...ts_ecc_memory/1It seems like it depends on motherboard maker only. Not like intel, only xeon can get ecc support not just that, you need ECC compatible motherboards too which cost a bomb |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0293sec
0.58
7 queries
GZIP Disabled