Avoid These 8 Major Mistakes When Buying a New 4K TV
http://4k.com/avoid-these-8-major-mistakes...-4k-tv-18447-2/

HDR Pro is probably LG marketing-speak for supporting HDR content without the full benefit of true HDR (like Dolby Vision).

The main difference between Dolby Vision and HDR10 though, is the colour depth and brightness the content and equipment is capable of achieving. Dolby Vision content is mastered in up to 12-bit colour depth, compared to 10-bit of HDR10 (which is where HDR10 gets its name from). You may be wondering, what difference could 12-bit over 10-bit possibly make? Well, 12-bit colour depth gives access to over 68 billion colours, compared to just 1 billion with 10-bit. This means the colours you see from Dolby Vision films and on compatible TVs are going to be far more accurate and as the director intended.

In order to watch Dolby Vision content, you need to have the right equipment. The benefit of Dolby Vision TVs is that they can support HDR10 as well, but HDR10 TVs can't do Dolby Vision, so if you want the best of both worlds, Dolby Vision is the way to go.


http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/139947-wha...-tech-explained

Yup very true bro...im doing some reading also http://www.avsforum.com/forum/166-lcd-flat...r-pro-mean.html 😋 some said marketing strategy for lg..yup the material very less..I think buying tv looking for hdr pro not worth for now unless the tv panel and colour is great if compare to the Sony hdr 😋..still confused on hdr pro

Haha 😋 yup bro next tv should have true Dolby vision but the price should be reasonable if not normal Dolby enough for me 😋..if Time fiber 100mbps covered all area sure cun..I think LG 65UH615T didn't mention about hdr 10 in their spec kinda playing hide n seek..they mention about hdr pro only didn't give detail explanation..still this model is ips panel sure the black won't look deep..tech going up so fast but material very less still not worth

I still overhear comments in shops by other shoppers that no point getting 4k if just watching Astro. There IS a difference if you get the right set.

DMT having promos so considering one of the following Q10 media box.

Sharp LC65UA330x 4kUHD Rm4899
Samsung UA65KU6000 UHD Rm5299
Sony KD65X8500D 4KHDR RM5899

Price wise am inclined towards Sharp but I can strectttted to Sammie or Sony for the 5 yrs warranty.

Any suggestions? Thanks

Thanks mate. Yes need to replace old tv to fully enjoy Q10 😁.
Looks like I need to increase by 1k to get better specs? Will check out Sony and others ard rm6k. Need to budget again.

should we get q10 if we have the latest sony tv that run on android tv os platform? heard that it is quite powerful as well.

Bro between minix and himedia which model is best for better audio output

hey guys, i'm looking for a uhd tv for my small room. the tv would not be much farther than the foot of the bed so i think 50" should be sufficient.
i have my eye on:-

Sony 49" 4K HDR Andriod LED TV KD49X7000D - RM2,699 (lazada)

Sharp AQUOS LED TV 50 inch LC50UE630X - RM2,799 (lazada)

having a smart/android tv will be handy and being in a room, i dont really want too many devices connected to it (wire clutter). however, at times i will connect my laptop to the tv.

which one would be better in terms of picture quality? and overall best buy?
any other tv's around that size, price bracket to recommend?

thanks guys

Hi, thanks for the replies. Anyone using the two models have anything they dislike about it? Fiddly ui? Poor remote? Any comments on the little things besides picture quality?
I have been searching for relevant pro reviews but without much luck as different models are available in different countries. US/UK seem to have diff offering to us. And also the reviews generally focus on the best series instead of the entry level variants.
Looks like I might have to toss a coin to help me decide!