Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 P4 Northwood vs Prescott GUIDE, P4 "C" vs P4 "E"

views
     
bgeh
post Apr 1 2004, 08:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,814 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE (shady86 @ Apr 1 2004, 07:52 PM)
Some new apps will take advantage of it especially those that got to do with encoding/decoding.

well i saw AT's DiVX 5.1.1 benchies which reputedly has SSE3 support but no gains blink.gif
puffy
post Apr 1 2004, 11:41 PM

desper@te house Guy
*****
Senior Member
716 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ


so 2.4c is pres or north?i m really noob about all of this sad.gif
michaelpng
post Apr 2 2004, 12:08 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
259 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang Boleh


the Prescott is very Hot, while using the original Fan from intel
the Northwood is better, the 2.4c is better for overclocking......

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Amd Athlon XP 2500+ (Overclock to Athlon XP 3200+ = v1.75)
Thermaltake Silent Boost (Hydro wave bearing fan)
Abit AN7 v1.0 BIOS date 03/04/2004
Cosair 256mb PC3200 X2
GeXCube 9600XT Hardcor Gamer 2.8ns 128mb [570/700]
Creative Sound Blaster Audigy DE
Maxtor 120G SATA HDD
Samsung 523252 & Samsung 16x DVD
LianLi PC-07 full with room cover and Temperature detecter
Creative Gigawork S750
Samsung 753DF monitor
tanghm
post Apr 2 2004, 12:48 AM

SSRI Addict
******
Senior Member
1,972 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley

2.4 - Northwood 400Mhz FSB
2.4B - Northwood 533Mhz FSB
2.4C - Nortwood 800Mhz FSB HyperThread
2.4A - Prescott
michaelpng
post Apr 2 2004, 12:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
259 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang Boleh


yayaya the 2.4A Prescott is extream overclocking

review at HardOcp......
http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NjAz

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Amd Athlon XP 2500+ (Overclock to Athlon XP 3200+ = v1.75)
Thermaltake Silent Boost (Hydro wave bearing fan)
Abit AN7 v1.0 BIOS date 03/04/2004
Cosair 256mb PC3200 X2
GeXCube 9600XT Hardcor Gamer 2.8ns 128mb [570/700]
Creative Sound Blaster Audigy DE
Maxtor 120G SATA HDD
Samsung 523252 & Samsung 16x DVD
LianLi PC-07 full with room cover and Temperature detecter
Creative Gigawork S750
Samsung 753DF monitor
michaelpng
post Apr 2 2004, 12:53 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
259 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang Boleh


this is the box lable, serial number....

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Amd Athlon XP 2500+ (Overclock to Athlon XP 3200+ = v1.75)
Thermaltake Silent Boost (Hydro wave bearing fan)
Abit AN7 v1.0 BIOS date 03/04/2004
Cosair 256mb PC3200 X2
GeXCube 9600XT Hardcor Gamer 2.8ns 128mb [570/700]
Creative Sound Blaster Audigy DE
Maxtor 120G SATA HDD
Samsung 523252 & Samsung 16x DVD
LianLi PC-07 full with room cover and Temperature detecter
Creative Gigawork S750
Samsung 753DF monitor


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
tanghm
post Apr 2 2004, 12:57 AM

SSRI Addict
******
Senior Member
1,972 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley

Eh eh, Prescott is 533Mhz FSB and not 800Mhz FSB ?? Is it HT capable ??
bgeh
post Apr 2 2004, 01:09 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,814 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
it probably is smile.gif
the A there stands for 533mhz FSB and not prescott only smile.gif
HMMaster
post Apr 2 2004, 01:11 AM

10K Club
Group Icon
Moderator
10,308 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


i dun think so....the website tat michaelpng gave said tat the 2.4A dun have HT support.....
bgeh
post Apr 2 2004, 01:26 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,814 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
but then again..........B shows 533mhz FSB..........blur!!!!
*im lost
TSikanayam
post Apr 2 2004, 01:32 AM

there are no pacts between fish and men
********
Senior Member
10,544 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: GMT +8:00

2.4A is Prescott only with no HT and a 533MHz FSB.
2.4B is Northwood with no HT and 533MHz FSB
2.4C is Northwood with HT and 800MHz FSB

I believe someone pointed this out somewhere in an earlier post in this thread.
shinjite
post Apr 2 2004, 09:17 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


The 2.4 A and B versions dun have HT
C, E and EE got HT
jimheng
post Apr 8 2004, 08:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
136 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bukit Mertajam - Berapit


Thanks./.....

Solty8
post Apr 9 2004, 02:03 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
298 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley
Sorry to butt in, but i think Prescott have more potential than Northwood, but not the current revision. Future revision b4 the new socket will see much more improvements, hopefully around the region of 4ghz or 5 ghz for overclockers.

Currently this is what i am able to hit, with AI7. Not much difference if i run with IC7 MAx3 tho, even with PAT disabled, AI7 kicks IC7 MAx 3 asses.

This post has been edited by Solty8: Apr 9 2004, 02:04 AM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
TSikanayam
post Apr 9 2004, 05:02 AM

there are no pacts between fish and men
********
Senior Member
10,544 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: GMT +8:00

Nobody doubts that Prescott will OC higher than Northwood in future revisions. The thing is, in its current state, you risk frying your mainboard when OCing a prescott, and i don't think that is a risk many people want to take. Currently, they OC on average only slightly better than the Northwood, and i think it is not worth the heat, the risk or even the performance.

Prescott will need the new socket in order to reduce the heat output. The greater number of pins will ensure a better power delivery methods and therefore reduce the heat output somewhat. Future revisions to the process technology will hopefully help also.
charge-n-go
post Apr 9 2004, 01:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,060 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang / PJ

P4E needs very long pipeline stages in order to ramp up to high clock speed in the future. It also uses larger cache to compensate the long pipeline penalty. Well, it claims that the branch prediction has improved significantly. It's normal for longer pipeline CPU to perform weaker due to the pipeline latency in every stages, if 1 stage causes 1ns latency, 31 stages causes 31ns latency compare to 20ns latency on northwood. Moreover, longer pipeline means a task can only be accomplished after 31 stages of pipeline, compare to 20 stages of northwood. Therefore, if no enhancement on cache, branch prediction or prefetching, 31 stages of pipeline will definitely slower than 20 stages pipeline CPU at the same clock speed. Main advantage of having long pipeline is to ramp up clock speed , because each task are divided into more stages, where each stage equal to 1 clock cycle.
silkworm
post Apr 9 2004, 03:41 PM

Enthusiast
Group Icon
Elite
965 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kajang


This is wrong on so many levels that I just can't keep quiet about it... sorry charge-n-go, nothing personal.
QUOTE
P4E needs very long pipeline stages in order to ramp up to high clock speed in the future.
very long pipeline stages
Prescott aka P4 E, has a long pipeline. A long pipeline has more stages. "very long pipeline stages" is a contradiction.

P4 E needs
"Need" isn't the right word to use here. The Intel designers could have used lots of other strategies to extend the P4 design. They just chose to lenghten the pipeline because it's the easiest way to ramp up the clock.

QUOTE
It also uses larger cache to compensate the long pipeline penalty.
Being the 2nd level away from the processor execution core, any instruction cache misses there means that the 12K-micro-operation trace cache had already missed in the first place, which probably already caused a significant delay. The expanded 16Kbyte data cache doesn't help either since pipeline penalties are instruction related, not data. So, expanded caches have little to help or impede performance in a CPU with a long pipeline.

QUOTE
It's normal for longer pipeline CPU to perform weaker due to the pipeline latency in every stages, if 1 stage causes 1ns latency, 31 stages causes 31ns latency compare to 20ns latency on northwood.
Latency is normally measured in clock-ticks, not nanoseconds. Furthermore, because the P4 "netburst" architecture features a double-pumped ALU, so the total in-flight time of an instruction is harder still to calculate.

QUOTE
Moreover, longer pipeline means a task can only be accomplished after 31 stages of pipeline, compare to 20 stages of northwood.
This is only true for the first instruction in an instruction stream... Every following instruction after that is retired with each consecutive cycle after that, so long as there are no pipeline stalls in between and no branch mispredictions/pipeline flushes. The whole point behind having a pipeline is that when an instruction "clears" a stage, that stage is ready to accept the next one, like the stations in a production line.

QUOTE
Main advantage of having long pipeline is to ramp up clock speed , because each task are divided into more stages, where each stage equal to 1 clock cycle.
This part, you got right laugh.gif

It's a misconception that every instruction needs to go through all the 21/31 pipeline stages while executing. The whole purpose of having the "trace cache" is to store decoded instructions, so that, in the case of a loop, the whole decode section of the pipeline can be ignored for the duration of the loop. If roughly 1/3 of the pipeline is solely for the decoding of instructions, that means that 1/3 can be ignored completely in a highly repeated loop, which is a significant amount of cycles saved.

One last point is that the P4 is a superscalar architecture, meaning that after the initial decode stage, the pipeline "splits" into different execution units for integer, floating point, SSE, and MMX instructions. That means the "31 stages" of the pipeline might actually represent the longest path through the pipeline, which is normally the floating point path. Less complicated instructions might fly through the pipeline in less stages. I don't have any evidence to back up this claim yet.. I'll update later if I find anything to prove or disprove this.

This post has been edited by silkworm: Apr 9 2004, 03:47 PM
TSikanayam
post Apr 9 2004, 09:37 PM

there are no pacts between fish and men
********
Senior Member
10,544 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: GMT +8:00

QUOTE (silkworm @ Apr 9 2004, 02:41 AM)
One last point is that the P4 is a superscalar architecture, meaning that after the initial decode stage, the pipeline "splits" into different execution units for integer, floating point, SSE, and MMX instructions. That means the "31 stages" of the pipeline might actually represent the longest path through the pipeline, which is normally the floating point path. Less complicated instructions might fly through the pipeline in less stages. I don't have any evidence to back up this claim yet.. I'll update later if I find anything to prove or disprove this.

Thank you very much for clearing that one up silkworm. I have some info on this smile.gif

The basic ALU pipeline on the Prescott is 31 stages, and i believe this does NOT include the initial decode stages! The FPU will probably be longer than that.
So that is one LONG pipeline.
nUtZ`
post Apr 10 2004, 12:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,868 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE (ikanayam @ Apr 9 2004, 09:37 PM)
Thank you very much for clearing that one up silkworm. I have some info on this smile.gif

The basic ALU pipeline on the Prescott is 31 stages, and i believe this does NOT include the initial decode stages! The FPU will probably be longer than that.
So that is one LONG pipeline.

The decoder stage is decoupled from the pipeline.. hence you get the trace cache... you decode the information ahead store it in the trace cache and send the instruction for processing
nUtZ`
post Apr 10 2004, 12:10 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,868 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
oh the decoder adds in another 8 stages to the pipeline

6 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0190sec    1.22    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 11:43 PM