QUOTE(lohwenli @ Feb 14 2007, 07:52 AM)
I'm surprsied though, if they're getting fined so hard, they can't be dropping price that bad. But its true, OEMs have been stocking up on ram in anticipation of Vista, but now turns out not many people interested in Vista. WinXP doesn't need that much ram-I can run C&C generals, do video editing in sony vegas & Adobe Encore, use Photoshop, surf firefox with 20+tabs ALL AT THE SAME TIME and STILL have 100+mb available with less than 100mb page file usage. Wonder how can I possibly use up 2GB?
QUOTE(linkinstreet @ Feb 14 2007, 10:07 AM)
You can't run all of those at the same time without bottlenecking your processor, unless you're using a kickass superproc. and have you REALLY used Vista. It uses less ram than touted really.
Well, to quote myself, I'm only talking about winxp.
I have not used Vista. So no comment on that from me. And I was talking about how much ram is needed, not that all of the programs are using the proc at the same time. However, the programs MUST be in memory/pagefile to be open at all, so what I'm saying is that for winXP you don't really need that much ram.
About OEMs, they have been shipping systems with typically 512mb of ram, occationally less

(which may be a little low for vista, I don't really know). About time they started building systems with more ram (especially considering vista needs a bit more), hence their sudden massive purchase a while back.
Sorry if there was a misunderstanding on what I posted earlier.