You are oure a idiot that I won't waste anymore time on joker like you.
From day one, you never said anything are informative with point beside "Eco World No 1", "Makan good... Got free food ar?"

good choice or bad choice ...welcome to si beh ulu place and we can yumcha when we moved in...we can take u swan fishing then...sorry mistake...duck fishing...

well he already moved on liao on the slope issue... i guess the next is whether there is any project that upon VP... their landscaping is not as what they promised initially when they launched the project...

Can, let me know when, haha

since landscapping is predominantly a heated contest and heavy weightage on expectations - so far has there been any open standards to declare which ones fail or succeed ? Any award / contest ? or its all down to individual expectations varies

Smart and wisdom are different..these short sight developer thought they are smart but no wisdom to understand what they are losing.

For Cradleton part I know. I have clarify many many times I already pass on slope as I know nothing we can do.

well in this context... can only compare against township that give promises like EW did i think... otherwise... no matter what also wouldn't be fair comparison... and so far... not much developers willing to give promises on landscaping like EW did except SPS maybe... even IJM, SDB, Gamuda also didn't emphasize their landscaping that much during project launching... hence owners will be happier if there are found anything familiar compare to brochures i guess...   

i see ...thanks bro; so all in all thee is no open standards to guage and certify landscaping officially
Maybe we should have the official VP include landscape as part of it, since maintenance fee is something all have to pay eventually for upkeeping

Otherwise, u see , i feel will not come to any good , surely there will be huge gaps of expectations between buyers VS developers, and moreover as brochures rendering as become part of marketing gimmick, VP law should be enlarged to protect buyers who bought in based on landscaping too

somehow... this may be how the property in Msia works... its quite sad actually... thats why most of the project launching i went... they will just emphasize on the general concepts... but they will not show you their commitment on the tiny details... thats the way is it... hopefully there is law that enable buyers to sue the developers based on their marketing brochures and photos and even bypass the disclaimer statement set on the brochure...

Yes, idiot , i think he is EM running dog,
Underdog is better then running dog .

Yes, idiot , i think he is EM running dog,
Underdog is better then running dog .

wah ...poor poor underdog...u really can catch us up like a jack bunny..good for u...our miow miow also cannot catch up so fast...by the time u replied it will be another 10 postings faster then ur replied...good job.....

wah ...poor poor underdog...u really can catch us up like a jack bunny..good for u...our miow miow also cannot catch up so fast...by the time u replied it will be another 10 postings faster then ur replied...good job.....

Y u guys wanna play gang up ah...
Bring it on 

Lol... whatever dog, Slumdog Millionaire is the best I guess

I'm not a lawyer (despite having a second LLB degree), I'm pretty sure you will not have much avenue to press your claims against a developer on landscaping that does not meet your personal standard. I'll bet there is nothing in the S&P that outlines how the landscaping is to be done.

Hence the only recourse for the buyers is to take it to social media and hit them where they hurt.. at their reputation. If they build up their premium tag reputation based on promises alone, and being shown they dont live up to their promises would be very damaging.

Funny how some ppl (claimed to be owner) here still defending EM like no tomorrow despite knowing the end product will never be close to what was promised. Only one possibility- EW cyber troopers are real.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion,and , the troopers really did some pretty good job.
I have seen their works across multiple forums, and the works are pretty elaborate and efficient.

Also, I have noted some troopers indicating that they are purchasers' too.

Maybe it is time the trooper assist in highlighting to the mgt the purchasers' concerns 
The troopers are after all, purchasers too.
So, it's win win for the troopers.