My rig score : 5.6 (Why memory only got 5.6???)

Processor: 5.9 (Intel Kentsfield Q6600)
Memory: 5.6 (2x 1GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer DDR2-800)
Graphics: 5.9 (XFX nVidia 8800GTX)
Gaming Graphics: 5.9 (XFX nVidia 8800GTX - 1920x1200)
Primary HD: 5.9 (WD 150GB Raptor SATA)

Aww man, your memory messed it up. Try using Corsair Dominator RAM. Make use of all the ports. 4X 1GB. Just my 2 cents.

@norazwan79: Do you OCed your PC? If yes, then the RAM should be able to reach to 5.9

yup.. Q6600 @ 3.25Ghz...
Dont know why only get 5.6 for ram...

Dats strange..im using only 2x1GB Kingston hyperx 6400 still can get 5.9 score for memory. thought crucial supposed to be better.



This post has been edited by peacezxp: Aug 16 2007, 03:07 PM

Most pathetic score in this thread



AMD Sempron +2600™ 3.0
Memory (RAM) 512 MB 2.9
Graphics NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 (Microsoft Corporation - XDDM) 1.9 !!!
Gaming graphics 64 MB Total available graphics memory 1.0 !!!
Primary hard disk 26GB Free (120GB Total) 5.1
Windows Vista ™ Ultimate

This post has been edited by SephiRave: Aug 12 2007, 04:07 PM

Dude, why even bother to install Vista and worst of all the Ultimate version on that kind of rig. Just stick to XP but I bet it's gonna lag. Just my 2 cents.

For testing purpose only I assume Just to check out what's the score for his hardwares

Ya, just testing my pathetic 4 year old hardware

Because I have Vista installed on a separate partition so no problem...
By the way what I am curious is that, though my Vista startup on that rig takes damn long time, when everything is loaded, the programs run much smoother than in XP.(With every necessary programs installed)

This post has been edited by SephiRave: Aug 14 2007, 02:36 PM

intel GMA950 can score more than 3.0-3.1 ...

my Ati X1250 on-board g.card only score 1.0 only

i dont think GMA950 can beat down ATI X1250 with such a high gap

there must be problems on the score page ....

My lappy's vista score : 4.8

RAM : 2GB DDR2 667
HD : 120 GB SATA 5400 rpm

ure smoking some dope or what..

never said anything about going past 5.9

every idiot out there knows 5.9 is the current limit...

my statement above was to refute some dude with false scores a few pages back

scores for cpu: with quads u get higher scores... c2d proven that intel/nvidia mobo chipsets differ
mem: based on bus speeds being closer to 1:1 with rams..

and dude... i dont have to push my comp to get 5.9.. its running 5.9 on all the scores at stock.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Aug 16 2007, 09:18 PM

mine... 1 yrs old rig...



This post has been edited by ahucks: Aug 16 2007, 09:25 PM

Unfortunately there are many idiot out still asking why there is a limit?

The 5.9 score means nothing to me since the algorithm doesn't take into consideration whether it is a Intel or nVidia platform.

I rest my case.

here mine

Why my aero cannot reach 5.9???

Wah lau, sama la bro. Minus, I don't have that X2 and DDR2 RAM.

Hi Everybody, this is my score....

let me show off....



Attached thumbnail(s)

Wow 1.0, very nice.