Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Conti car vs Asian car

views
     
roocarroll
post Nov 1 2016, 12:32 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
It's not apples to apples. Skoda are classified as a conti in Malaysia but they are a world away from BMW and Jaguar. It's like saying Proton and Toyota are in the same category because they are Asian cars. Each brand has its own strengths and weaknesses.
roocarroll
post Nov 1 2016, 10:28 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
QUOTE(kadajawi @ Nov 1 2016, 01:38 AM)
What are your experiences with Skoda?

I was passenger in a Skoda Superb II, and it was superb. Quiet, comfortable, and as roomy as hell.

There are obviously big differences between contis, and what they want to achieve. It is similar with Japs. Some cars want to get you from A to B safely (for example the Golf, though it also tries to be fun as far as that doesn't compromise safety), while others are all about the fun (Seat Leon, though closely related to the Golf, is far more engaging to drive, and the F20 1 series BMW does fun rather well too, without sacrificing comfort). The French (Citroen and Renault) are more interested in comfort, while Peugeot is aiming for fun (and IMHO the 208 is great fun, I only had one for a day, but I think I fell in love a bit...). In terms of refinement I feel like VW spends the most in premium feeling materials and dampening, while the French are a bit more creative in creating an interesting and nice environment without having to spend too much. Seat and Skoda are more to a budget, though still far ahead of the Japs.

Keep in mind that Japanese brands tend to offer cars for the Asian market that they don't offer in Europe or some other more demanding areas (I wouldn't call the US demanding, they have other priorities like that the car needs to last forever, but it doesn't need to feel posh or well built. Big panel gaps? Who cares). The cars in Malaysia are meant to get you from A to B, somehow. Price is important, space is important. Fun, safety, not important. Posh feeling? Not important. (Of course the bigger, more expensive the car, the posher it is, generally speaking. Same applies for contis).

If you want the Conti feel in a Japanese car, I'd say your best bet is a Mazda. Lexus is good too. I've been in their small hybrid, and while it lacks the style, it is refined like a VW or above would be. The rear passengers don't sit as good though, it feels rather cheap back there.

I think Karenalvin is joking. What do you do as a religious person? You pray. Italian cars, being so unreliable (that's an outdated stereotype though, they aren't worse than others) will make you pray... pray that the car will work.

Anyway I only drive conti cars, and my mother doesn't want any Japanese either... a) because of Japanese occupation, and b) because of terrible experiences (like a Japanese car falling apart beyond repair after 2 years or so...). There is a certain refinement, a certain feeling that the car doesn't just want to get you to the destination in them.
*
They are pretty popular where I come from. I drove a 2016 Superb around Ireland for 2 weeks in July. It's a great car but the steering is very wooden. It's much more of a Toyota than a Honda. It's very economical too. A full tank of diesel did more than 1,000km.

roocarroll
post Nov 1 2016, 03:38 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
I should add that having driven a 2016 Skoda Superb for 2 weeks, I'd rather drive my 2011 Honda Accord. The handling is much better on my Accord.

Like I said before, you can't say that all continental cars are this or all Asian cars are that. It just depends on the brand.
roocarroll
post Nov 1 2016, 03:46 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
QUOTE(ic no 851025071234 @ Nov 1 2016, 03:40 PM)
Is thee any difference in inside feel? Like conti cars more solid material and looks classy while Asian cars have the cheap toy material look?
*
Again, it depends on the brand and the model. Not all Mercs are S classes and not all Hondas are Accords.

The Superb is a well built car but it's no S Class. It's similar to my Accord. It's nice and we'll built but it's not amazing.
roocarroll
post Nov 1 2016, 09:01 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
I think you might have better luck breaking cars down by nationality rather than continents. I think most people will agree that Proton and Toyota share very few qualities. BMW and TVR share equally as few.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0157sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 07:13 AM