QUOTE(Hansel @ Nov 2 2016, 10:57 AM)
I have both ASX FP and FSM SG funds. I say the same thing again :-
1) If you don't wish to do any work, go for ASX FP.
2) If you wish to do homework, go for FSM, be it FSM MY or FSM SG.
If you put into ASX FP and not take out since 2004, the fund can grow 200% too, rough count,... compounding effect.
The beauty of the ASX FP is one can definitely get 6-7% per yr without fail, unlike FSM UTs whereby, in some yrs... you get negative returns and in other years, positive returns.
1) If you are a 'lazy' Fixed Income investor, go for ASX FPs for stability.
2) If you are a Growth Investor, go for FSM UTs, but please study up first.
QUOTE(kpfun @ Nov 3 2016, 09:50 AM)
No - not correct to say that. Other fund houses have to work hard for results to attract subscribers.
Unfortunately, not all the VP funds are out performing, and therefore,
the challenge for ordinary investors is how to pick the right one. Whereas, FP is for "no need to crack brain to think which one to pick" investors.kpfun reiterated on what I mentioned on Nov 2, 2016.
Yes, there is an error in my statements being : since 2004, compounding effect,... but it was for just for one yr only was the dividend paid out in cheque since I invested. I hoped forummers don't harp on this,...
To add more : I used to be satisfied earning 6-7% per year back in those days, but when the RM plunged in 2014/5, and the SGD rose to 1 SGD = RM3 or more,... I don't think 6-7% is good enough anymore. We must not look only at in-country events, or compare with in-country FD rates and in-country UT performance, we have to see and compare with our purchasing power against the whole world.