Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

13 Pages « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Proton Persona terlalu keras, Bomba susah potong

views
     
ruffstuff
post Aug 23 2016, 08:07 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,345 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kkk8787 @ Aug 22 2016, 11:21 PM)
Theirs is HPF. means all the japanese cars are inferior to proton is it. Like vios corolla and camry are more inferior compared to protons. Serious questions. Or its just that japanese are not advertising their processing
*
The japanese may use UHSS up to 1000-1300mpa. It can achieve similar strength level like HPF steel, but at the expense of weight.
wholaimi
post Aug 23 2016, 08:14 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
25 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: shah alam


HPF is ULTRA HIGH STRENGTH STELL (UHSS). When people talk about numbers like 590, 780, 1000, 1200.....that is tensile strength, not their hardness (Hv). HPF can be fabricate with 900 tensile strength and have >500Hv level. That is some tough stuff.

Bezza max tensile is 590. They scored high ASEAN NCAP because of their small engine, which create more space in the engine room, thus during frontal impact, their small engine have less intrusion into cabin + Active Safety features (which if we remove from the package on the lower line, you basically exposed to serious injury)
dares
post Aug 23 2016, 08:18 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(mat79 @ Aug 23 2016, 01:20 AM)
yup,its true,bezza scored excellently in it. for iriz, it is due to mark being deduct from modifier. Im hoping they managed to rectify it in persona n iriz(facelift).

*
Yea I read modifier "footwell rupture". Is it identified as an design issue or an isolated event in the crash test? if design issue, there are no plans to address it in the Iriz's current iteration?

QUOTE(tidus2k @ Aug 23 2016, 07:52 AM)
1. One of the main contributor for good crash result is the weight. Bezza is 930kg max while iriz 1180kg max. In frontal odb test, the kinetic energy come from the car itself. Crash engineer rule of thumb, 100kg reduction leads to 10% less intrusion @ firewall. Easier to get good result.
2. Engine package. The smaller the size (not cc), the better the crash result. Bezza has good engine package.
3. Crash is stochastic event, very difficult to get consistent result especially @ lower leg area. Let say you can get max 16 points in one test, you can get as low as 15.4 points in another test. So if iriz 14.07, most probably due to it is at the lowest limit (engineer task is to ensure that in the worst variation, it can still achieve the target)
4. Crash result depends on dummy calibration. For each area, head, neck, chest, femur, tibia etc there's a corridor that the dummy need to comply. let say chest deflection, you can have variations up to 6mm between dummy to another dummy. If in the test, you get dummy calibrated at the lower corridor, then you're lucky.

How do I know this? I used to worked as crash simulation engineer for audi.

For you to compare iriz and bezza result is unfair due to huge weight difference, this has been explained in NCAP FAQ. In high speed collision between both car, bezza has less chance to survive. Bezza has max 590MPa steel, iriz has countless 590MPa, a few 780,980,1180MPa parts with a couple of 1470MPa grade of hot formed steel
*
Good info thumbup.gif
shinchan^^
post Aug 23 2016, 08:23 AM

K66
*********
All Stars
21,256 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pekopon


QUOTE(audi90 @ Aug 22 2016, 05:41 PM)
later accident cannot save people inside, coz bomba lmbt potong.. owaiiii
*
true rclxms.gif
dares
post Aug 23 2016, 08:25 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(wholaimi @ Aug 23 2016, 08:14 AM)
HPF is ULTRA HIGH STRENGTH STELL (UHSS). When people talk about numbers like 590, 780, 1000, 1200.....that is tensile strength, not their hardness (Hv). HPF can be fabricate with 900 tensile strength and have >500Hv level. That is some tough stuff.

Bezza max tensile is 590. They scored high ASEAN NCAP because of their small engine, which create more space in the engine room, thus during frontal impact, their small engine have less intrusion into cabin + Active Safety features (which if we remove from the package on the lower line, you basically exposed to serious injury)
*
If say between a 2-airbag Iriz and 2-airbag Bezza, which do you think would fare better in a side impact? hmm.gif

This post has been edited by dares: Aug 23 2016, 08:25 AM
littlefire
post Aug 23 2016, 08:33 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,736 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Penang


QUOTE(akagidemon @ Aug 23 2016, 03:55 AM)
it's good to see proton is getting serious on safety.
heck they can even become somesort like a volvo of asia if they want.
become obsessed with safety like volvo until make cars with super hard body shell using boron steel.
*
Maybe Volvo of Malaysia, if want to say Asia is too wide.. Subaru already been knew as Japanese Volvo at oversea.. Still Proton still a long way to go.. 6 Air-bags and VSC is a normal in the past.. Now people are gunning Emergency Automated Brake system, lane departure system or Automated Driving System.. Previously if not mistaken Proton got work with LG (google: Proton Iriz prototype fitted with LG ADAS camera).. But where is the result... confused.gif
tidus2k
post Aug 23 2016, 08:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
31 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
QUOTE(dares @ Aug 23 2016, 08:25 AM)
If say between a 2-airbag Iriz and 2-airbag Bezza, which do you think would fare better in a side impact? hmm.gif
*
1. Have you seen the 360 videos right? There is CAE analysis video of side impact. The intrusion were targeted at b pillar lower area. This means less intrusion at the chest and pelvic area. That should indicate a very good side impact result even without side and curtain airbag. Mind you that iriz use HPF grade for side impact.

2. Bezza has the advantage also, being lightweight, the inertia of the whole vehicle is less than iriz. But Bezza only use max 590MPa (advance high strength steel), the rest 270MPa (mild steel), 340MPa and 440MPa (high strength steel)
I manage to find a picture of bezza body in white. From the picture it is hard to imagine what type of material that they use. The color code is probably not indicate material, but crash load path (front, side etc)
http://www.automachi.com/2016/07/why_perod...an_ncap_5_star/
So who knows, unless they test the car and publish the result


wholaimi
post Aug 23 2016, 08:41 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
25 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: shah alam


QUOTE(dares @ Aug 23 2016, 09:25 AM)
If say between a 2-airbag Iriz and 2-airbag Bezza, which do you think would fare better in a side impact? hmm.gif
*
In term of frontal crash, it would be equal bcoz bezza small engine+large engine clearance & iriz UHSS.
but if we measure on crash worthiness, iriz & new persona win because their UHSS are well-positioned in all critical area of the body (Front Pillars, Side Members, Center Pillars). I believe new Persona also have HPF on B-Pillar (Center Pillar) for side impact like Iriz
ruffstuff
post Aug 23 2016, 08:41 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,345 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(littlefire @ Aug 23 2016, 08:33 AM)
Maybe Volvo of Malaysia, if want to say Asia is too wide.. Subaru already been knew as Japanese Volvo at oversea.. Still Proton still a long way to go.. 6 Air-bags and VSC is a normal in the past.. Now people are gunning Emergency Automated Brake system, lane departure system  or Automated Driving System.. Previously if not mistaken Proton got work with LG (google: Proton Iriz prototype fitted with LG ADAS camera).. But where is the result...  confused.gif
*
ADAS, AEB is for Proton on wards and they already prepared for it whenever our local JPJ gazeted it or ASEAN NCAP demand for it. If put it now, it just create unnecessary cost. They already trying hard to push the important of ESC last time, but at the end our local market are just not very sensitive in terms of this active safety system. Probably the new Exora will have this feature hopefully.
kkk8787
post Aug 23 2016, 08:46 AM

Julyd8th
*******
Senior Member
2,529 posts

Joined: Sep 2013


QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Aug 23 2016, 08:07 AM)
The japanese may use UHSS up to 1000-1300mpa. It can achieve similar strength level like HPF steel, but at the expense of weight.
*
Lets say a vios head on collision with an iriz. Who suffers more
ruffstuff
post Aug 23 2016, 08:56 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,345 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kkk8787 @ Aug 23 2016, 08:46 AM)
Lets say a vios head on collision with an iriz. Who suffers more
*
Not sure. But i think the vios have maxed 590MPa HS steel only.
dares
post Aug 23 2016, 08:57 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(tidus2k @ Aug 23 2016, 08:40 AM)
1. Have you seen the 360 videos right? There is CAE analysis video of side impact. The intrusion were targeted at b pillar lower area. This means less intrusion at the chest and pelvic area. That should indicate a very good side impact result even without side and curtain airbag. Mind you that iriz use HPF grade for side impact.

2. Bezza has the advantage also, being lightweight, the inertia of the whole vehicle is less than iriz. But Bezza only use max 590MPa (advance high strength steel), the rest 270MPa (mild steel), 340MPa and 440MPa (high strength steel)
I manage to find a picture of bezza body in white. From the picture it is hard to imagine what type of material that they use. The color code is probably not indicate material, but crash load path (front, side etc)
http://www.automachi.com/2016/07/why_perod...an_ncap_5_star/
So who knows, unless they test the car and publish the result
*
QUOTE(wholaimi @ Aug 23 2016, 08:41 AM)
In term of frontal crash, it would be equal bcoz bezza small engine+large engine clearance & iriz UHSS.
but if we measure on crash worthiness, iriz & new persona win because their UHSS are well-positioned in all critical area of the body (Front Pillars, Side Members, Center Pillars). I believe new Persona also have HPF on B-Pillar (Center Pillar) for side impact like Iriz
*
Thanks rclxms.gif The factor of Steel tensile strength is something new to me in terms of safety engineering, so is the weight factor in crash testing. Thanks for sharing.

This post has been edited by dares: Aug 23 2016, 08:57 AM
tidus2k
post Aug 23 2016, 08:58 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
31 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
QUOTE(kkk8787 @ Aug 23 2016, 08:46 AM)
Lets say a vios head on collision with an iriz. Who suffers more
*
If both hurling at each other with both vehicle speed 64kph 40% offset , vios will surely die. There is a finite element model of Toyota yaris sedan 2010 US version which is equivalent to Toyota vios dugong in Malaysia readily available to download at national crash analysis center, George Washington university. Oem use this as benchmark. I have seen it. The structure is weak.

Based on yaris model, only one part has tensile strength >1000Mpa, the rest max 590MPa

This post has been edited by tidus2k: Aug 23 2016, 09:02 AM
akagidemon
post Aug 23 2016, 09:02 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
453 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Between Reality and Fantasy


QUOTE(littlefire @ Aug 23 2016, 08:33 AM)
Maybe Volvo of Malaysia, if want to say Asia is too wide.. Subaru already been knew as Japanese Volvo at oversea.. Still Proton still a long way to go.. 6 Air-bags and VSC is a normal in the past.. Now people are gunning Emergency Automated Brake system, lane departure system  or Automated Driving System.. Previously if not mistaken Proton got work with LG (google: Proton Iriz prototype fitted with LG ADAS camera).. But where is the result...  confused.gif
*
maybe not yet the time to put it in the cars. cost could be a driving factor.
frossonice
post Aug 23 2016, 09:08 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
337 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


This morning I was in engineering class just because I read some comments here.

Good stuff for /k.
MjMax15
post Aug 23 2016, 09:27 AM

Uncle Scrooge is back!
******
Senior Member
1,372 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Heritage Waterfront City


lel...
anything with potong sure discussion up to engineer level
meanwhile.other model
no fuk safety is given. sales like pisang goreng fireworks. haha
Musikl
post Aug 23 2016, 09:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
265 posts

Joined: Sep 2014


QUOTE(MjMax15 @ Aug 23 2016, 09:27 AM)
lel...
anything with potong sure discussion up to engineer level
meanwhile.other model
no fuk safety is given. sales like pisang goreng fireworks. haha
*
Its like comparing religion vs science.
dares
post Aug 23 2016, 09:40 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
Poton made sure to insert this shot "Not Takata OK!" laugh.gif

user posted image

This post has been edited by dares: Aug 23 2016, 09:40 AM
fertzm
post Aug 23 2016, 09:46 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
53 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
From: kokpit gundam


QUOTE(MjMax15 @ Aug 23 2016, 09:27 AM)
lel...
anything with potong sure discussion up to engineer level
meanwhile.other model
no fuk safety is given. sales like pisang goreng fireworks. haha
*
no need discuss this that la
see claimed fc 20km/l straight buy
kevintth
post Aug 23 2016, 09:47 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,618 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(kkk8787 @ Aug 23 2016, 08:46 AM)
Lets say a vios head on collision with an iriz. Who suffers more
*
Although is not iriz Vs vios... but this case was suprima s vs altis. Head to head crash in Genting
Both 5 star. The report says passenger in altis were serious injured compare to suprima driver

user posted image

Source
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/3549340/all

13 Pages « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » 
Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0164sec    0.50    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 09:02 PM