Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Proton Persona terlalu keras, Bomba susah potong

views
     
dares
post Aug 22 2016, 05:47 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
Potong Persona
dares
post Aug 22 2016, 05:49 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ledtechn @ Aug 22 2016, 05:47 PM)
iriz also hpf. how come bezza score better in terms of frontal crash of course? bezza scored 15.38/16. iriz scored 14.07/16.
*
Obviously Bezza is tougher.

2,000MPa UHTS steel kot
dares
post Aug 22 2016, 05:50 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ar188 @ Aug 22 2016, 05:49 PM)
manufacturers around the world promote Ultra high tensile steel
this one promote HPF pulak.. lol means to say they not using Ultra high tensile steel to begin with!
*
1,500 MPa is categorized as HTSS or UHTSS?
dares
post Aug 22 2016, 05:55 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ar188 @ Aug 22 2016, 05:52 PM)
who is using 1500 MPa steel? use 1500Mpa and HPF process ah?
*
Watch the video.....around 45sec
dares
post Aug 22 2016, 06:07 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Aug 22 2016, 06:03 PM)
though bezza steel is like hilux only 1/3 keras of P1 ?
*
funny u should mention "1/3"

can you read chinese?

http://coco01.net/post/118517

read the MPa figure they are boasting about.
dares
post Aug 22 2016, 06:10 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ar188 @ Aug 22 2016, 06:07 PM)
lepas tempa is 1500Mpa
means started with much lower strength steel

meanwhile others also got using 1800Mpa steel stock.
*
as far as I know only Mazda using 1.8GPa steel on their CX5. and only on the front reinforcement beam.

http://www.adandp.media/articles/mazda-use...g-steel-in-cx-5

isnt the final figure the most important? regardless of the strength before treatment? hmm.gif

EDIT: link added. my bad its front and rear bumper reinforcement on the cx5

This post has been edited by dares: Aug 22 2016, 06:14 PM
dares
post Aug 22 2016, 06:16 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(frossonice @ Aug 22 2016, 06:12 PM)
So, it is more like 590 mpa for Bezza.

So much for 'UHTS' claim.
*
Although important, steel strength is not the be-all-end-all factor in cabin stiffness, there is also the design and weld points.

If Bezza can score full stars in NCAP, maybe there is some clever design going on.
dares
post Aug 22 2016, 06:20 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ar188 @ Aug 22 2016, 06:18 PM)
and u saying whole car chassis was formed with HPF meh? am sure is only few critical components only la.

i think if start from high figure steel stocks is better and consistent overall strength for the part.
*
of coz not la, just the critical parts.

if stock steel figure higher of course is better. But I think 1500MPa on a popularly precieved Milo tin car is worth mentioning. I mean, credit where credit is due.
dares
post Aug 22 2016, 09:13 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ayygringo95 @ Aug 22 2016, 08:25 PM)
Highest spec Iriz have 6 airbags, Standard spec like the picture you post only have 2 airbags,  the safety equipment are the same with lowest spec Iriz.
*
Doesn't matter, the AOP score is the same across all Iriz range, be it 2 airbags or 6 airbags. Fact of the matter is, Iriz barely made it 5 stars in frontal collision test (minimum is 14.00 in AOP).

user posted image

Too bad the score does not include side impact tests, something which the curtain airbags would make a huge difference.

This post has been edited by dares: Aug 22 2016, 09:14 PM
dares
post Aug 23 2016, 08:18 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(mat79 @ Aug 23 2016, 01:20 AM)
yup,its true,bezza scored excellently in it. for iriz, it is due to mark being deduct from modifier. Im hoping they managed to rectify it in persona n iriz(facelift).

*
Yea I read modifier "footwell rupture". Is it identified as an design issue or an isolated event in the crash test? if design issue, there are no plans to address it in the Iriz's current iteration?

QUOTE(tidus2k @ Aug 23 2016, 07:52 AM)
1. One of the main contributor for good crash result is the weight. Bezza is 930kg max while iriz 1180kg max. In frontal odb test, the kinetic energy come from the car itself. Crash engineer rule of thumb, 100kg reduction leads to 10% less intrusion @ firewall. Easier to get good result.
2. Engine package. The smaller the size (not cc), the better the crash result. Bezza has good engine package.
3. Crash is stochastic event, very difficult to get consistent result especially @ lower leg area. Let say you can get max 16 points in one test, you can get as low as 15.4 points in another test. So if iriz 14.07, most probably due to it is at the lowest limit (engineer task is to ensure that in the worst variation, it can still achieve the target)
4. Crash result depends on dummy calibration. For each area, head, neck, chest, femur, tibia etc there's a corridor that the dummy need to comply. let say chest deflection, you can have variations up to 6mm between dummy to another dummy. If in the test, you get dummy calibrated at the lower corridor, then you're lucky.

How do I know this? I used to worked as crash simulation engineer for audi.

For you to compare iriz and bezza result is unfair due to huge weight difference, this has been explained in NCAP FAQ. In high speed collision between both car, bezza has less chance to survive. Bezza has max 590MPa steel, iriz has countless 590MPa, a few 780,980,1180MPa parts with a couple of 1470MPa grade of hot formed steel
*
Good info thumbup.gif
dares
post Aug 23 2016, 08:25 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(wholaimi @ Aug 23 2016, 08:14 AM)
HPF is ULTRA HIGH STRENGTH STELL (UHSS). When people talk about numbers like 590, 780, 1000, 1200.....that is tensile strength, not their hardness (Hv). HPF can be fabricate with 900 tensile strength and have >500Hv level. That is some tough stuff.

Bezza max tensile is 590. They scored high ASEAN NCAP because of their small engine, which create more space in the engine room, thus during frontal impact, their small engine have less intrusion into cabin + Active Safety features (which if we remove from the package on the lower line, you basically exposed to serious injury)
*
If say between a 2-airbag Iriz and 2-airbag Bezza, which do you think would fare better in a side impact? hmm.gif

This post has been edited by dares: Aug 23 2016, 08:25 AM
dares
post Aug 23 2016, 08:57 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(tidus2k @ Aug 23 2016, 08:40 AM)
1. Have you seen the 360 videos right? There is CAE analysis video of side impact. The intrusion were targeted at b pillar lower area. This means less intrusion at the chest and pelvic area. That should indicate a very good side impact result even without side and curtain airbag. Mind you that iriz use HPF grade for side impact.

2. Bezza has the advantage also, being lightweight, the inertia of the whole vehicle is less than iriz. But Bezza only use max 590MPa (advance high strength steel), the rest 270MPa (mild steel), 340MPa and 440MPa (high strength steel)
I manage to find a picture of bezza body in white. From the picture it is hard to imagine what type of material that they use. The color code is probably not indicate material, but crash load path (front, side etc)
http://www.automachi.com/2016/07/why_perod...an_ncap_5_star/
So who knows, unless they test the car and publish the result
*
QUOTE(wholaimi @ Aug 23 2016, 08:41 AM)
In term of frontal crash, it would be equal bcoz bezza small engine+large engine clearance & iriz UHSS.
but if we measure on crash worthiness, iriz & new persona win because their UHSS are well-positioned in all critical area of the body (Front Pillars, Side Members, Center Pillars). I believe new Persona also have HPF on B-Pillar (Center Pillar) for side impact like Iriz
*
Thanks rclxms.gif The factor of Steel tensile strength is something new to me in terms of safety engineering, so is the weight factor in crash testing. Thanks for sharing.

This post has been edited by dares: Aug 23 2016, 08:57 AM
dares
post Aug 23 2016, 09:40 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
Poton made sure to insert this shot "Not Takata OK!" laugh.gif

user posted image

This post has been edited by dares: Aug 23 2016, 09:40 AM
dares
post Aug 23 2016, 12:12 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(s@ni @ Aug 23 2016, 11:48 AM)
Oi pic sape avatar tu
*
https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=4033267

laugh.gif
dares
post Aug 23 2016, 08:11 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ar188 @ Aug 23 2016, 07:06 PM)
deswai i dunno why HPF , which is a steel forming technology suddenly end up as a factor to promote safety lol.
just say you got use a few metal parts which achieve ultra high tensile strength la.

*
Agreed. I also don't understand why they choose to pimp HPF instead of UHSS.

Actually what they were trying to communicate was "Unlike most carmakers, we have some high tech HPF press in our factory that can make lightweight UHSS, so our cars are tough but lightweight"......which would invite more questions like "lightweight why FC still so high?" or "so that's why you need RM1.5bil bailout because you spent the money on some fancy press machine" laugh.gif

Oh well....that's Poton marketing for you. If they had just simply threw out a 1.5GPa figure it would've been simpler and more impressive, instead of HPF HPF HPF.

This post has been edited by dares: Aug 23 2016, 08:12 PM
dares
post Aug 23 2016, 11:11 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Aug 23 2016, 10:59 PM)
I mean why not?  It is a marketing opportunity and you make use of it.  They didn't emphasize on HPF at all during Preve, just mention about it at glance. But it is not part of their big marketing campaign.  Not in the Suprima and Iriz.  Now they decided, we have this technology and others don't. how fool are we not use this as marketing?  If other automakers have this, they will make use full of it. Even the Perodua already quite bangga about their 590Mpa HS. Proton just keep quite about this. Even exora already have UHSS they did not market it properly.
*
Sure HPF is nice to have. But UHSS would be the more important point right? I mean the name UHSS directly refers to strong steel used in the car, while HPF refers to the process only.

You look at the Persona360 video, at the shot showing the factory floor, on of the Persona assembly line, replace those "HPF HPF HPF HPF" with "UHSS UHSS UHSS UHSS".....wouldn't that be more straight to the point?
dares
post Aug 24 2016, 09:20 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Aug 24 2016, 03:24 AM)
hahaha
ok ma, at least they TRIED...

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Suddenly so active in /k blink.gif

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0238sec    1.00    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 06:54 AM