Potong Persona
Proton Persona terlalu keras, Bomba susah potong
Proton Persona terlalu keras, Bomba susah potong
|
|
Aug 22 2016, 05:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
Potong Persona
|
|
|
Aug 22 2016, 05:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
|
|
|
Aug 22 2016, 05:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
|
|
|
Aug 22 2016, 05:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
|
|
|
Aug 22 2016, 06:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Aug 22 2016, 06:03 PM) funny u should mention "1/3"can you read chinese? http://coco01.net/post/118517 read the MPa figure they are boasting about. |
|
|
Aug 22 2016, 06:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
QUOTE(ar188 @ Aug 22 2016, 06:07 PM) lepas tempa is 1500Mpa as far as I know only Mazda using 1.8GPa steel on their CX5. and only on the front reinforcement beam.means started with much lower strength steel meanwhile others also got using 1800Mpa steel stock. http://www.adandp.media/articles/mazda-use...g-steel-in-cx-5 isnt the final figure the most important? regardless of the strength before treatment? EDIT: link added. my bad its front and rear bumper reinforcement on the cx5 This post has been edited by dares: Aug 22 2016, 06:14 PM |
|
|
Aug 22 2016, 06:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
QUOTE(frossonice @ Aug 22 2016, 06:12 PM) Although important, steel strength is not the be-all-end-all factor in cabin stiffness, there is also the design and weld points.If Bezza can score full stars in NCAP, maybe there is some clever design going on. |
|
|
Aug 22 2016, 06:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
QUOTE(ar188 @ Aug 22 2016, 06:18 PM) and u saying whole car chassis was formed with HPF meh? am sure is only few critical components only la. of coz not la, just the critical parts.i think if start from high figure steel stocks is better and consistent overall strength for the part. if stock steel figure higher of course is better. But I think 1500MPa on a popularly precieved Milo tin car is worth mentioning. I mean, credit where credit is due. |
|
|
Aug 22 2016, 09:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
QUOTE(ayygringo95 @ Aug 22 2016, 08:25 PM) Highest spec Iriz have 6 airbags, Standard spec like the picture you post only have 2 airbags, the safety equipment are the same with lowest spec Iriz. Doesn't matter, the AOP score is the same across all Iriz range, be it 2 airbags or 6 airbags. Fact of the matter is, Iriz barely made it 5 stars in frontal collision test (minimum is 14.00 in AOP).![]() Too bad the score does not include side impact tests, something which the curtain airbags would make a huge difference. This post has been edited by dares: Aug 22 2016, 09:14 PM |
|
|
Aug 23 2016, 08:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
QUOTE(mat79 @ Aug 23 2016, 01:20 AM) yup,its true,bezza scored excellently in it. for iriz, it is due to mark being deduct from modifier. Im hoping they managed to rectify it in persona n iriz(facelift). Yea I read modifier "footwell rupture". Is it identified as an design issue or an isolated event in the crash test? if design issue, there are no plans to address it in the Iriz's current iteration?QUOTE(tidus2k @ Aug 23 2016, 07:52 AM) 1. One of the main contributor for good crash result is the weight. Bezza is 930kg max while iriz 1180kg max. In frontal odb test, the kinetic energy come from the car itself. Crash engineer rule of thumb, 100kg reduction leads to 10% less intrusion @ firewall. Easier to get good result. Good info 2. Engine package. The smaller the size (not cc), the better the crash result. Bezza has good engine package. 3. Crash is stochastic event, very difficult to get consistent result especially @ lower leg area. Let say you can get max 16 points in one test, you can get as low as 15.4 points in another test. So if iriz 14.07, most probably due to it is at the lowest limit (engineer task is to ensure that in the worst variation, it can still achieve the target) 4. Crash result depends on dummy calibration. For each area, head, neck, chest, femur, tibia etc there's a corridor that the dummy need to comply. let say chest deflection, you can have variations up to 6mm between dummy to another dummy. If in the test, you get dummy calibrated at the lower corridor, then you're lucky. How do I know this? I used to worked as crash simulation engineer for audi. For you to compare iriz and bezza result is unfair due to huge weight difference, this has been explained in NCAP FAQ. In high speed collision between both car, bezza has less chance to survive. Bezza has max 590MPa steel, iriz has countless 590MPa, a few 780,980,1180MPa parts with a couple of 1470MPa grade of hot formed steel |
|
|
Aug 23 2016, 08:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
QUOTE(wholaimi @ Aug 23 2016, 08:14 AM) HPF is ULTRA HIGH STRENGTH STELL (UHSS). When people talk about numbers like 590, 780, 1000, 1200.....that is tensile strength, not their hardness (Hv). HPF can be fabricate with 900 tensile strength and have >500Hv level. That is some tough stuff. If say between a 2-airbag Iriz and 2-airbag Bezza, which do you think would fare better in a side impact? Bezza max tensile is 590. They scored high ASEAN NCAP because of their small engine, which create more space in the engine room, thus during frontal impact, their small engine have less intrusion into cabin + Active Safety features (which if we remove from the package on the lower line, you basically exposed to serious injury) This post has been edited by dares: Aug 23 2016, 08:25 AM |
|
|
Aug 23 2016, 08:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
QUOTE(tidus2k @ Aug 23 2016, 08:40 AM) 1. Have you seen the 360 videos right? There is CAE analysis video of side impact. The intrusion were targeted at b pillar lower area. This means less intrusion at the chest and pelvic area. That should indicate a very good side impact result even without side and curtain airbag. Mind you that iriz use HPF grade for side impact. 2. Bezza has the advantage also, being lightweight, the inertia of the whole vehicle is less than iriz. But Bezza only use max 590MPa (advance high strength steel), the rest 270MPa (mild steel), 340MPa and 440MPa (high strength steel) I manage to find a picture of bezza body in white. From the picture it is hard to imagine what type of material that they use. The color code is probably not indicate material, but crash load path (front, side etc) http://www.automachi.com/2016/07/why_perod...an_ncap_5_star/ So who knows, unless they test the car and publish the result QUOTE(wholaimi @ Aug 23 2016, 08:41 AM) In term of frontal crash, it would be equal bcoz bezza small engine+large engine clearance & iriz UHSS. Thanks but if we measure on crash worthiness, iriz & new persona win because their UHSS are well-positioned in all critical area of the body (Front Pillars, Side Members, Center Pillars). I believe new Persona also have HPF on B-Pillar (Center Pillar) for side impact like Iriz This post has been edited by dares: Aug 23 2016, 08:57 AM |
|
|
Aug 23 2016, 09:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
Poton made sure to insert this shot "Not Takata OK!"
![]() This post has been edited by dares: Aug 23 2016, 09:40 AM |
|
|
Aug 23 2016, 12:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
|
|
|
Aug 23 2016, 08:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
QUOTE(ar188 @ Aug 23 2016, 07:06 PM) deswai i dunno why HPF , which is a steel forming technology suddenly end up as a factor to promote safety lol. Agreed. I also don't understand why they choose to pimp HPF instead of UHSS.just say you got use a few metal parts which achieve ultra high tensile strength la. Actually what they were trying to communicate was "Unlike most carmakers, we have some high tech HPF press in our factory that can make lightweight UHSS, so our cars are tough but lightweight"......which would invite more questions like "lightweight why FC still so high?" or "so that's why you need RM1.5bil bailout because you spent the money on some fancy press machine" Oh well....that's Poton marketing for you. If they had just simply threw out a 1.5GPa figure it would've been simpler and more impressive, instead of HPF HPF HPF. This post has been edited by dares: Aug 23 2016, 08:12 PM |
|
|
Aug 23 2016, 11:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Aug 23 2016, 10:59 PM) I mean why not? It is a marketing opportunity and you make use of it. They didn't emphasize on HPF at all during Preve, just mention about it at glance. But it is not part of their big marketing campaign. Not in the Suprima and Iriz. Now they decided, we have this technology and others don't. how fool are we not use this as marketing? If other automakers have this, they will make use full of it. Even the Perodua already quite bangga about their 590Mpa HS. Proton just keep quite about this. Even exora already have UHSS they did not market it properly. Sure HPF is nice to have. But UHSS would be the more important point right? I mean the name UHSS directly refers to strong steel used in the car, while HPF refers to the process only.You look at the Persona360 video, at the shot showing the factory floor, on of the Persona assembly line, replace those "HPF HPF HPF HPF" with "UHSS UHSS UHSS UHSS".....wouldn't that be more straight to the point? |
|
|
Aug 24 2016, 09:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
|
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0238sec
1.00
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 06:54 AM |