Firstly, there's a 2.5L turbo in the CX9, so I guess the possibility, however minute, is there for them to put it in the 3 or CX5.
Secondly, I'm a big NA fan, so I'm pleased to see Mazda continue to develop sans turbocharging (even though everyone and their mothers are shoving a turbo down their tiny <2L engines).
I do not agree with the sentiment that turbo power makes a car fun to drive - I've always appreciated the linear pull of a good NA engine.
So I recently got a Subaru with a CVT. This is my first time owning a CVT, but I've previously rented a Mitsu ASX with CVT and I wasn't impressed with it - it felt lethargic, it droned and very uninspired as a whole.
But with the Subaru - it's a 3.6L unit with bundles of torque - it felt smooth and effortless.
The revs were happy to stay low while the car still pulled.
It made the whole notion of changing gears feel antiquated - no more jerky gearshifts.
I guess what I'm trying to get at is - don't diss it until you've tried it

my previous car was a Proton Exora CVT Turbo 1.6 so i know what i'm talking about. it's not about the jerky gearshifts. it's the CVT lag that is annoying. even when you floor the pedal it takes the car at least 1-2 seconds before it responses. with the price tag for your Subaru.. if you are not happy with it then something is seriously wrong