Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo/Quad Overclocked Rev. 2, Going beyond factory limits
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 1 2007, 09:09 AM
|
|
QUOTE(irenic @ Jan 31 2007, 02:42 PM) takmo try! hahaha just kidding anyway i hope to see more results from commando user and abit quad gt user  w00t? abit not that bad la weii, but the bios overclocking menu really simple later i update if i manage to get somethin' magical result with my c0mmand0  Added on February 1, 2007, 11:25 am.. current test with my c0mmando note: when i still using DS3, hard to bypass 3.2Ghz barrier  all hardware used are same, only change the mob0 This post has been edited by gengstapo: Feb 1 2007, 11:25 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 1 2007, 01:16 PM
|
|
QUOTE(irenic @ Feb 1 2007, 01:09 PM) great result.. but i'm surprised with ds3 u couldnt break 3.2ghz.. bcoz ds3 is quite good in oc.. sorry, actually what i mean was during prime/ stress session laa i can do 400 x9 with my previous ds3 but to pass prime almost impossible so, i try to get as high as i can(target 3.3Ghz atleast with ds3) which is prime stable 8hrs but failed currently on my c0mmando, almost reach 8hrs & will stop my prime
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 2 2007, 05:15 PM
|
|
QUOTE(DaRkSyThE @ Feb 2 2007, 12:44 PM) looking good dude. im also pretty tempted to grab thois board seeing as toits performace is prett good especially in XS forums juz grab it bro, need no waiting QUOTE(yehlai @ Feb 2 2007, 04:58 PM) @Tampoi, can E4300/E4400 join this thread? Maybe some other forumers alrdy o'c their proc and ready to share their result. yeahh, should be welcome whom using e43/ e44
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 3 2007, 02:07 PM
|
|
QUOTE(rlhc17 @ Feb 2 2007, 10:31 PM) Another update Abit AB9 Quad GT : No boots up problem for using e6600 over 400fsb compare to other p965 board that i had tested  yoshh there booting direct from BIOS ka? the bios menu nice? QUOTE(suri @ Feb 3 2007, 02:02 PM) i bought the e4300 at viewnet. rm614. stated price rm604 but have to add rm10 coz buy proc only. my mobo have both agp and pcie. but pcie speed only 4x. also have both ddr and ddr2. the chipset is VIA(R) PT880 Pro/Ultra. u dont wanna buy this board if ur into overclock. but it is a great board if u still have all those old but reliable things (Kingston HyperX ddr ram, 6600GT agp gc) or if u dont really have much money to buy all things at the same time, like me  . took me 6 months planning to setup this new system..  nice, usaha tangga kejayaan
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 5 2007, 09:07 AM
|
|
QUOTE(rlhc17 @ Feb 5 2007, 01:51 AM) yup direct from bios bios menu simple & easy  d@mn, izzit better than aw9d-max?
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 5 2007, 11:27 AM
|
|
QUOTE(emubleeeem @ Feb 5 2007, 11:21 AM) issit stable to run orthos? i dont think so if can get 3.4-3.6 for daily useage already very nice
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 6 2007, 11:35 AM
|
|
QUOTE(yehlai @ Feb 6 2007, 11:24 AM) Actually u should run Orthos Prime test instead of prime95. Orthos prime is design for dual core/Core2 proc. And i think 1.3125vCore is too low for 3.2GHz set up and u play DVD summore, thts why ur proc crash and pc will reboot. (vCore is too low so proc is not stable.). If u set 1.3125vCore and try Orthos i dont think u can prime stable for 2hrs anymore. Safety range for vCore adding is +5% vCore. yupp, i think so coz mine stable at 3.2Ghz speed would be 1.325v
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 6 2007, 03:39 PM
|
|
QUOTE(fo33il @ Feb 6 2007, 03:22 PM) kinda noticed that u all using the gigabyte mobo...is it suitable with C2D? sorry for noob question.. hahaa kamon d0od, if its not suitable, Y we use it? ps: can u dig it
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 7 2007, 06:39 PM
|
|
QUOTE(irenic @ Feb 6 2007, 10:54 PM) just ran sets of benchmarks on vista 32 and clock to clock comparison between vista and xp shows vista has better score.. will upload screenshots at this post soon. kewL br0, thanks 4 sharing ps: c0mmando user, Asus just release new Bios 0803, get it HERE
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 8 2007, 08:35 AM
|
|
QUOTE(mfcm @ Feb 8 2007, 01:12 AM) thx bro for da info..hv u tried new bios?hows?better then 0801?  already BIOS to 0803, kinda ok laa but havent thru heavy oc yet maybe need to change my RAM 1st kinda fed-up with my cheapo KVR
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 8 2007, 12:40 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mfcm @ Feb 8 2007, 12:37 PM) yeah..come on bro get new ram..huhu wat it wud be  waiting ur gud news oc on this new bios..hope perfom better w/o bugs  w00t?? only waiting for me arr? urs dunt want OC??
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 9 2007, 08:55 AM
|
|
hurmm.. 400 x9 = 3.6Ghz w00t, nice clock but to make it stable, i dont think so
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 16 2007, 08:23 AM
|
|
QUOTE(mfcm @ Feb 13 2007, 08:06 PM) yeah..ur luck wit skills to tweak it  alo bung, bila lagi mau kasi show-off itu tuniq?  wanna c the performance is killing or not
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 16 2007, 04:43 PM
|
|
QUOTE(stevenlee @ Feb 12 2007, 10:28 PM) higher achieve is for my e6400 at 3.2ghz... can refer to C2D oc page... i post my detail over there.. that time my ram able to hit 800mhz ....then i cant go higher due to my ram (corsair)..and now i change to Patriot it seem better compare to corsair but i think try to pust it yet... ... u directly b0ot from bios or u overclock in windows environment using uguru?
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 16 2007, 10:48 PM
|
|
^ic ic.. coz lastime im using the AW9D-Max, highest FSB i can b0ot via bi0s less than 350 if urs can do 400FSB, its should be nice, IMO if u can get stable at 3.4Ghz at lower vcore, that already nice
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 21 2007, 04:33 PM
|
|
QUOTE(HaHaNoCluE @ Feb 21 2007, 03:40 PM) as stated above post.. will lowering temp lower the v core?? i read a few of urs oc result n u guys seems to be able to run at very low v core... not to mention those who r able to undervolt their cpu.. what is the guideline of normal oc v core?? i found temp guide but v core guide any1??? since u runnin' on ES, i think its kinda normal my e66(retailed) speedin' at 3.33Ghz@ 1.4V for 24/7 useage currently still dont have time to find best setup
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 22 2007, 08:45 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Hyde`fK @ Feb 22 2007, 01:11 AM) look like the diff. between both e43 & e63 very small larger FSB doesnt help e63 alot, but since the e43 having higher multi, this could be the point where it can compete with e63 Added on February 22, 2007, 8:49 amQUOTE(vailance @ Feb 22 2007, 12:39 AM) anyway, my mobo no Vcore mod so i able to oc the fsb to 300 max wanna ask 2.1ghz E6300 (300*7) VS 2.7ghz E4300 (300*9) both 6300 and 4300 which 1 will perform faster? im planning to get a new c2d this week.. need some help here.. shall the e43 faster than e63 This post has been edited by gengstapo: Feb 22 2007, 08:49 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 22 2007, 09:43 PM
|
|
QUOTE(siauann @ Feb 22 2007, 07:57 PM) i also agree wif u...perhaps my proc limiting me..  but i believe our ram can go higher...i havnt tried updating bios yet..coz some ppl claim different bios different oc results kamon, get the e66 or e43 can optimize the useage of ur RAM This post has been edited by gengstapo: Feb 22 2007, 09:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 23 2007, 08:43 AM
|
|
QUOTE(SHOfrE3zE @ Feb 23 2007, 08:14 AM) i dunno where 2 post it.. but i'll just post it here. my friend bought an E6600 weeks ago and just found out that cpu-z and system properties shows that his proc is an E6800!. is it possible that the manufacture accidently place the chip or is it a bug on windows? wo0t? can u post the cpu-z screenie?
|
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 23 2007, 10:50 AM
|
|
QUOTE(SHOfrE3zE @ Feb 23 2007, 08:55 AM) it's not ES since he bought it a c-zone.. sure, i'll post out his cpu-z later coz i haven't recieve it yet.. i hope he didn't tipu me la.. nice.. but the prob is, when it comes to RMA if its really not the same(e66) sure hard lohh
|
|
|
|
|