QUOTE(hiphop @ May 29 2007, 08:51 PM)
s0rry but i cant see any screenie here Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo/Quad Overclocked Rev. 2, Going beyond factory limits
Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo/Quad Overclocked Rev. 2, Going beyond factory limits
|
|
May 29 2007, 09:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#121
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31 2007, 09:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#122
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(yehlai @ May 31 2007, 08:27 PM) Bro, are taking the risk of crashin' ur system or damaging ur mobo when u o'c with i-cute. Better run all setting by default b4 any unwanted things happen. lol.. my advise laa, dont even use akuc0mel with ur rig coz it seems need al0t powerlastime my p4 rig using this psu almost burnt even runnin' at st0ck |
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 05:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#123
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(AceCombat @ Jun 1 2007, 12:35 PM) i can 200% confirmed what mobo is that,it's w0ot damn.. never tot P5B-Deluxe was capable of handling those speed..Asus P5B-Deluxe! Intel P965 chipset mobo! compare it with the link's pic and my attached pic. thumb up for Asus |
|
|
Jun 5 2007, 08:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#124
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2007, 10:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#125
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(VT-Ten @ Jun 6 2007, 10:46 AM) guys, got a n00b question here. errr i thinks it is.. higher speed & bandwidth consume more voltage(s)changing from FSB 400x8 to 400x9 generally need to up the voltage of vcore, and nothing else (FSB, NB, SB voltage) right? perhaps, maybe sata & pci-e voltage need to be raise also |
|
|
Jun 10 2007, 10:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#126
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 19 2007, 09:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#127
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(§layerXT @ Jun 19 2007, 04:46 PM) yupp, e66 shall easily reach 3.5ghz~3.6ghz stable running short-term benchmarkbut for stability testm, shall be quite problem0 QUOTE(remysix @ Jun 19 2007, 05:27 PM) not ALL E6600 plz...dun wan people starts rushing buying the E6600...mmm, maybe that's the main reason - marketing gimmick. yeahh, the sifuz already speakin'.. |
|
|
Jun 20 2007, 09:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#128
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(VT-Ten @ Jun 20 2007, 08:55 AM) proc temp reached 85C at certain point during overnight load @ 3.2Ghz using 1.38vcore. do you think it's normal or i need to reseat my HSF? i feel u should check ur HSf since 85c load at 1.38v pretty high idle temp is 43C ![]() http://img77.imageshack.us/my.php?image=highqg5.jpg i use vcore 1.48v for my e66 but load at 88c.. almost same with u but my voltage sure higher |
|
|
Jun 24 2007, 09:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#129
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
w0ot.. all movin' into quad-ro already ahh
nice.. wanna see more OC result from the quaddy |
|
|
Jul 2 2007, 12:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#130
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Jul 20 2007, 07:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#131
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.3099sec
0.30
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 01:10 AM |