Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Xbox 360 will always have better looking games, yeeehaaaaa

views
     
TSam_eniey
post Jan 16 2007, 04:45 AM, updated 18y ago

✿✿✿✿✿
*******
Senior Member
3,314 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Taman Sri Melati, KL



After his keynote at the International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas earlier this week, Bill Gates was chatting to a small group of reporters about the 360 and according to a blogger from Mercury News, Gates talked about how Microsoft and Sony have switched positions.

He said that this time, Microsoft has the high ground. It has "a small box, costs less, is visually compelling, has great games, does online superbly and offers all of the tools for game developers to make games easily," Gates said referring to the 360.

He also said that Sony doesn't have any advantage in graphics saying that Sony "burned a year" trying to make the Cell processor do graphics functions. And when it didn't work, they went to Nvidia for the graphics chip at the last minute. Gates said the 360 game developers would always be a year ahead of Sony on the learning curve in taking advantage of the system and as a result, PS3 will never have games that look better than Xbox 360's.

Currently it's true, Gears of War is the best looking game on any system. There's just no denying it. But I guess only time will tell if Sony will prove Mr. Gates wrong. I for one hope they will, as I imagine Microsoft will then retaliate and it's us, the gamers, that end up playing the sickest looking games ever created.
PrivateJohn
post Jan 16 2007, 06:03 AM

ODST m cry.
Group Icon
VIP
7,071 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: London :: Mutiara Damansara :: Xbox Live Network



Ya, you do not want the competition to die...it do us no good.

All we need to understand is everyone is having a great time with Gears of War or Lost planet or Viva Pinata or....barbie horse adventure. That's what matters.
judge-the
post Jan 16 2007, 07:41 AM

-Judge-Jury-Executioner-
*******
Senior Member
3,331 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: -MegaCity One-


360 not a quite success yet lah... remember 3ROD? pity those that got 3ROD earlier...
Microsuck_360
post Jan 16 2007, 08:38 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


as long moore is there xbox will not success hmm.gif
samurai20
post Jan 16 2007, 08:39 AM

~~HMMMM~~
******
Senior Member
1,441 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
Not 'ALL".. my wanted list game in 360.. so i dont care want machine ... better... i just want to play GOOD game... that all.... most big RPG game i like.. ....goes to SONY.. only little on 360... sad.gif.... & than SONy only release PS3.. 2--3 month ago.. maybe next year... PS3... got lot of "good" game... biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by samurai20: Jan 16 2007, 08:40 AM
entity
post Jan 16 2007, 08:43 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Seberang Perai


yep, only time can tell
fair-pley
post Jan 16 2007, 10:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
131 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Selayang Baru, Selangor.


QUOTE(PrivateJohn @ Jan 16 2007, 06:03 AM)
Ya, you do not want the competition to die...it do us no good.
*
Yeah agree..it will benefit more to end user like us. They r fighting, we r enyoying..

QUOTE(samurai20 @ Jan 16 2007, 08:39 AM)
Not 'ALL".. my wanted list game in 360.. so i dont care want machine ... better... i just want to play GOOD game... that all.... most big RPG game i like.. ....goes to SONY.. only little on 360... sad.gif.... & than SONy only release PS3.. 2--3 month ago.. maybe next year... PS3... got lot of "good" game... biggrin.gif
*
Same wif u. Im still assume Sony will alwayz manage to get the BIG KILLER games..But now 360 is rockin. MS need to offer more variety in game genre instead of shooting..shooting n shooting again..
Lord_Ashe
post Jan 16 2007, 10:54 AM

Old Treasure Hunter Sidekick
******
Senior Member
1,495 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Damansara Perdana - KL


Or maybe eventually they'll fall into the genre of a console solely for shiny, pretty, shooters.

Which isn't bad, IMHO. Each console will have a niche. It DOES get boring quite fast, which is why MS is rolling out all the IPTV bells and whistles...
silencer
post Jan 16 2007, 11:56 AM

AnyThiN GoEs
******
Senior Member
1,846 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: City^of^Anggerik



Just don't forget , with the humongous cas reserves, Microsoft can always play the unfair advantage by taking over any game developer companies.....especially the one that has close association with its competitors...and I am predicting at least 3/4 dgame developer companies will be under the roof of Microsoft Game Studio this year...

This post has been edited by silencer: Jan 16 2007, 11:58 AM
fair-pley
post Jan 16 2007, 12:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
131 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Selayang Baru, Selangor.


QUOTE(silencer @ Jan 16 2007, 11:56 AM)
Just don't forget , with the humongous cas reserves, Microsoft can always play the unfair advantage by taking over any game developer companies.....especially the one that has close association with its competitors...and I am predicting at least 3/4 dgame developer companies will be under the roof of Microsoft Game Studio this year...
*
yet to be seen near future. Many games will cross platform. Ermm..spec n func wise hmm.gif 360 maybe.
rx330
post Jan 16 2007, 02:22 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
11,809 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
me no fanboy here, but x360 really not my cup of tea
although the graphics i saw on dead rising was real nice, and i heard GOW is way better

anyway, the more competition the more improvement, but i really hate those games whre they have it on all consoles

anyway, if $$ permits, i will still be getting a X360 , it seem s tat alot of fun cums from online gaming
Evirober
post Jan 16 2007, 05:02 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
636 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL


wow
even the toys are our for this game

http://www.xl-shop.com/xlshop/product_imag...AI-FIGURE-N.jpg
ventriloquist
post Jan 16 2007, 05:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
does anyone read about graphic comparison between 360 n PS3 on gamespot? they compare ridge racer 6 with 7(if im not mistake, there is another games too) n found out 360 delivers better graphic gameplay than ps3...

still... 360 already out about 1 year, n ps3 just few months ago... let just wait n see...

*as long as major games from team ninja does not belong to ps3... they broke my heart when they decided to developed ninja gaiden sigma for ps3. if not im going to jump from my rooftop for sure...
TSam_eniey
post Jan 16 2007, 05:59 PM

✿✿✿✿✿
*******
Senior Member
3,314 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Taman Sri Melati, KL



QUOTE(ventriloquist @ Jan 16 2007, 05:52 PM)
does anyone read about graphic comparison between 360 n PS3 on gamespot? they compare ridge racer 6 with 7(if im not mistake, there is another games too) n found out 360 delivers better graphic gameplay than ps3...

still... 360 already out about 1 year, n ps3 just few months ago... let just wait n see...

*as long as major games from team ninja does not belong to ps3... they broke my heart when they decided to developed ninja gaiden sigma for ps3. if not im going to jump from my rooftop for sure...
*
hahahahahahahahahaha
Sd-RawK-Cab25
post Jan 16 2007, 08:14 PM

Yiw maaaaaader!
****
Senior Member
595 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Some lady's bush


i totally agree in expanding the genre of games on 360. have u guys noticed tht DOA4 is the only fighting game on 360 for now?

yea we have vf5 and def jam on the way..but still..how far can fighting games go on next gen eh?

blink.gif
deodorant
post Jan 16 2007, 08:46 PM

Surfing LYN instead of Working.
*******
Senior Member
5,691 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Am I the only one who thinks that it would be better for a console monopoly?

I mean, I'm not fortunate enough to be able to own ALL consoles, and quite often I've thought "wow I'd SO love to have that game but I don't have the console for it."

IMO console monopoly is good. The quality of the games would arguably be the same because there's still competition between the studios, but the difference to us would be all the best games would be playable on the same console biggrin.gif
Microsuck_360
post Jan 16 2007, 09:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(ventriloquist @ Jan 16 2007, 05:52 PM)
does anyone read about graphic comparison between 360 n PS3 on gamespot? they compare ridge racer 6 with 7(if im not mistake, there is another games too) n found out 360 delivers better graphic gameplay than ps3...

still... 360 already out about 1 year, n ps3 just few months ago... let just wait n see...

*as long as major games from team ninja does not belong to ps3... they broke my heart when they decided to developed ninja gaiden sigma for ps3. if not im going to jump from my rooftop for sure...
*
yup 360 games got this nice lighting...but have to remember what will happen if Resistance plays on 360...? hmm.gif
alkt
post Jan 16 2007, 09:13 PM

^_^
Group Icon
VIP
10,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur



just wait til Heavenly Swords and White Knight releases on the PS3 then u can compare that time smile.gif
redbull_y2k
post Jan 16 2007, 09:20 PM

"Viva La Revolucion!"
******
Senior Member
1,469 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: YOU.ESS.JAY



QUOTE(Microsuck_360 @ Jan 16 2007, 09:01 PM)
yup 360 games got this nice lighting...but have to remember what will happen if Resistance plays on 360...? hmm.gif
*
Actually RR7 had far better lighting than RR6 but the jaggies are quite noticeable. sweat.gif
samurai20
post Jan 16 2007, 09:24 PM

~~HMMMM~~
******
Senior Member
1,441 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(alkt @ Jan 16 2007, 09:13 PM)
just wait til Heavenly Swords and White Knight releases on the PS3 then u can compare that time smile.gif
*
yeah just SAW trailer for those game... the GFX.. cant say anything la.. so fuking GOOD.. hope... it will remain until the game release.. biggrin.gif....

**now saving money to buy Wii & PS3.. biggrin.gif
Microsuck_360
post Jan 16 2007, 09:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(redbull_y2k @ Jan 16 2007, 09:20 PM)
Actually RR7 had far better lighting than RR6 but the jaggies are quite noticeable.  sweat.gif
*
heheh better wait for RR7 for 360 lol... laugh.gif personally i think RR series is like 'mangsa' xperiment for new console lol....
redbull_y2k
post Jan 16 2007, 09:35 PM

"Viva La Revolucion!"
******
Senior Member
1,469 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: YOU.ESS.JAY



QUOTE(Microsuck_360 @ Jan 16 2007, 09:30 PM)
heheh better wait for RR7 for 360 lol... laugh.gif personally i think RR series is like 'mangsa' xperiment for new console lol....
*
that's what i thought too... got tired of RR series as well. laugh.gif
prazole
post Jan 16 2007, 09:54 PM

Sleepyhead..
******
Senior Member
1,513 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Kuching - Klang



QUOTE(Microsuck_360 @ Jan 16 2007, 09:30 PM)
heheh better wait for RR7 for 360 lol... laugh.gif personally i think RR series is like 'mangsa' xperiment for new console lol....
*
RR7 coming 360 meh?

ventriloquist
post Jan 16 2007, 10:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
QUOTE(prazole @ Jan 16 2007, 09:54 PM)
RR7 coming 360 meh?
*
i don't think so... most likely RR6 dedicated to 360... RR7 for PS3...

and some link...

X360 vs PS3

RR6 Vs RR7

few words from me... everyone got their own taste... graphic "delicacies" hehe biggrin.gif
deepan84
post Jan 16 2007, 10:14 PM

White Rider
*******
Senior Member
2,199 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: OKR KL


have to wait forwhile for ps3 to warm up..hehe..den u'll see da dazzling gfx. its like a 200m race. 1st 100m x360 leadin but later on wen ps3 active..win da race..hehe.. i hope neva kena blasah coz supportin ps3 in 360 section=P hehe.. jus my 0.02sen.
ikanayam
post Jan 16 2007, 11:14 PM

there are no pacts between fish and men
********
Senior Member
10,544 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: GMT +8:00

QUOTE(silencer @ Jan 15 2007, 10:56 PM)
Just don't forget , with the humongous cas reserves, Microsoft can always play the unfair advantage by taking over any game developer companies.....especially the one that has close association with its competitors...and I am predicting at least 3/4 dgame developer companies will be under the roof of Microsoft Game Studio this year...
*
Sony can always send them exploding batteries to take them out laugh.gif


QUOTE(deodorant @ Jan 16 2007, 07:46 AM)
Am I the only one who thinks that it would be better for a console monopoly?

I mean, I'm not fortunate enough to be able to own ALL consoles, and quite often I've thought "wow I'd SO love to have that game but I don't have the console for it."

IMO console monopoly is good. The quality of the games would arguably be the same because there's still competition between the studios, but the difference to us would be all the best games would be playable on the same console biggrin.gif
*
Monopolies are BAD. Competition is the reason why the 360 and the PS3 are selling below cost at the moment.



QUOTE(deepan84 @ Jan 16 2007, 09:14 AM)
have to wait forwhile for ps3 to warm up..hehe..den u'll see da dazzling gfx. its like a 200m race. 1st 100m x360 leadin but later on wen ps3 active..win da race..hehe.. i hope neva kena blasah coz supportin ps3 in 360 section=P hehe.. jus my 0.02sen.
*
Sorry, won't happen.
deepan84
post Jan 16 2007, 11:17 PM

White Rider
*******
Senior Member
2,199 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: OKR KL


which wan wont happen? da blasah or ps3 winnin x360? hehe.. i heard capcom gonne be bought by m$oft.. if dat happens, ps3 kantoi giler..
silencer
post Jan 16 2007, 11:34 PM

AnyThiN GoEs
******
Senior Member
1,846 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: City^of^Anggerik



QUOTE(alkt @ Jan 16 2007, 09:13 PM)
just wait til Heavenly Swords and White Knight releases on the PS3 then u can compare that time smile.gif
*
And by the time they r released......I wonder which new 360 games titles that will be a good comparison.....as it is pretty obvioud that microsoft seems like have already pre-planned their strategy for all upcoming titles of PS3.....I am not 360 fanboy, as I am going to purchase the pS3 too later...but it is pretty clear that the business strategy of microsoft has always one step ahead of sony..and i believe that this flexibilty approach of planning is highly influenced by their strong cash resources......... whistling.gif
xxboxx
post Jan 16 2007, 11:44 PM

The mind is for having ideas, not holding them
*******
Senior Member
5,261 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: J@Y B33


QUOTE(deepan84 @ Jan 16 2007, 11:17 PM)
which wan wont happen? da blasah or ps3 winnin x360?
*

so you just post here for people to bash you? seeking for attention?
alkt
post Jan 16 2007, 11:47 PM

^_^
Group Icon
VIP
10,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur



That time ah, maybe Forza2? AC4 can't compare much lah but if AC4 on the xbox360 supports Live, i'll definitely get 1.

dun forget VF5 is coming to the PS3 also. oh, GRAW2 for the xbox360 smile.gif
Microsuck_360
post Jan 17 2007, 12:01 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


personally i think if games from 360 port to PS3 will not be nice..like Vegas i think 360 will be much more better (well have to wait and see) ..but PS3 exclusive games will definitely will look better... blush.gif
izaman
post Jan 17 2007, 03:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Puchong



this thing really make me think twice....or even thrice before changing to other next gen console. hehehe. long live x360
ventriloquist
post Jan 17 2007, 11:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
QUOTE(izaman @ Jan 17 2007, 03:42 PM)
this thing really make me think twice....or even thrice before changing to other next gen console. hehehe. long live x360
*
don't change, just play both(as long u don't hav problem with money...)

just imagine ur father eager to give u lots of buck to spend on PS3... plus a plasma tv (most likely he get 1080p new 42 sony bravia)... thats happen to my friend now... and his respond is..."i gonna wait probably a year until there is plenty of games i want to buy, and play like there is no tomorrow..."
izaman
post Jan 18 2007, 10:40 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Puchong



maybe i will choose xbox360 and ps2 or xbox360 and wii. maybe this year i will buy ps2, then next year i will buy wii.

wiiiiiiii hihihihihi
TSam_eniey
post Jan 18 2007, 06:21 PM

✿✿✿✿✿
*******
Senior Member
3,314 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Taman Sri Melati, KL



PS2???????GET REAL
izaman
post Jan 19 2007, 10:41 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Puchong



QUOTE(am_eniey @ Jan 18 2007, 06:21 PM)
PS2???????GET REAL
*
to buy ps3 too expensive. and some of the games i really love to play. and in my opinion, it is still worth it to buy ps2.

maybe you are up-to-date type of gamers.

sometimes, some people like old school way. wink.gif

p/s i still play snes eventhough the technology is an old one. smile.gif

This post has been edited by izaman: Jan 19 2007, 10:44 AM
Moraine77
post Jan 19 2007, 04:17 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
for me...
All depend on games.... for temp. 360 got lot of good tittle compared ps3
IMO resistance not really as good as expected...

ps2 won becaused the games tittle... huge....
else xbox1 or gamecube can take on ps2 graphic...
+ xbox and gc less problem in mechanism

nah i'm not any fanboy, it's juz my opinion not to flame anyone

TSam_eniey
post Jan 19 2007, 06:09 PM

✿✿✿✿✿
*******
Senior Member
3,314 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Taman Sri Melati, KL



QUOTE(Moraine77 @ Jan 19 2007, 04:17 PM)
for me...
All depend on games.... for temp. 360 got lot of good tittle compared ps3
IMO resistance not really as good as expected...

ps2 won becaused the games tittle... huge....
else xbox1 or gamecube can take on ps2 graphic...
+ xbox and gc less problem in mechanism

nah i'm not any fanboy, it's juz my opinion not to flame anyone
*
you are so right......you're the truth
matty
post Jan 19 2007, 06:18 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
347 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur


by the way, sony real market strategy is not america or europe. they focus on Japan. if the japan market successful they will consider that the ps3 is a success. else MS concentrate on world wide market. ofcourse they will move a bit faster than the sony la.
ventriloquist
post Jan 19 2007, 07:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
QUOTE(matty @ Jan 19 2007, 06:18 PM)
by the way, sony real market strategy is not america or europe. they focus on Japan. if the japan market successful they will consider that the ps3 is a success. else MS concentrate on world wide market. ofcourse they will move a bit faster than the sony la.
*
when the first time i heard about MS going for console, i tot it was really crazy move, while sony and nintendo r manipulating the market and ppl brain with lots of games. Just imagine every 1st gen xbox MS lost profits, not gain it. But MS is damn too rich to start anything, even trying to compete ipod with zune...

ppl don't really xpected xbox would be successful, including me... since i tot MS doesn't hav xp in console marketing+games+building it... i was wrong. In fact i really xcited and brain washing my rich room mate to buy one, after his brand new ps2 got stolen. He felt he regret bought his xbox, since xbox concentrate on US @ europe game compare to JP games... but xbox start to shine with JP games introduced to xbox (thanx Team Ninja for making DOA series and mine most favorite games of all time : Ninja Gaiden). The graphic really outstanding... and so on.

no mater how many PS series going to be release at JP, they always overcome any "outsider" console in that country, it's like JP ppl got a mind set like "expensive stuff always good quality, why bother buy cheaper one?" and definitely "JP stuff made for JP ppl, by JP own ppl"...

sorry for long post, but i believe x360 or next gen xbox can survive in console war... and hopefully they become no 1 for world favorite console. long live xbox biggrin.gif

just my 2cent....
*i repeat again... if team ninja going to release their best games for PS3 or next gen PS... im going to jump from my rooftop....*
ikanayam
post Jan 19 2007, 09:17 PM

there are no pacts between fish and men
********
Senior Member
10,544 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: GMT +8:00

QUOTE(matty @ Jan 19 2007, 05:18 AM)
by the way, sony real market strategy is not america or europe. they focus on Japan. if the japan market successful they will consider that the ps3 is a success. else MS concentrate on world wide market. ofcourse they will move a bit faster than the sony la.
*
Really now. Makes me wonder why they had more PS3s in the USA than they had in Japan at launch... hmm.gif hmm.gif hmm.gif
redbull_y2k
post Jan 19 2007, 11:02 PM

"Viva La Revolucion!"
******
Senior Member
1,469 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: YOU.ESS.JAY



QUOTE(ikanayam @ Jan 19 2007, 09:17 PM)
Really now. Makes me wonder why they had more PS3s in the USA than they had in Japan at launch...  hmm.gif  hmm.gif  hmm.gif
*
LOL, u got a point there. laugh.gif
silencer
post Jan 20 2007, 05:21 AM

AnyThiN GoEs
******
Senior Member
1,846 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: City^of^Anggerik



QUOTE(matty @ Jan 19 2007, 06:18 PM)
by the way, sony real market strategy is not america or europe. they focus on Japan. if the japan market successful they will consider that the ps3 is a success. else MS concentrate on world wide market. ofcourse they will move a bit faster than the sony la.
*
hahahahahaa....I can't even find any reason that a multinational company with a worldwide brand like sony will only concentrate in its local market, and letting go the vast opportunity in the most valuable market of United States...and even in several of European countries ..... darn....u must be dreaming....sorry, just cant stop myself from expressing it....

This post has been edited by silencer: Jan 20 2007, 05:21 AM
izaman
post Jan 21 2007, 02:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Puchong



US and EU have a very large market man. quite impossible they only concentrate only in Japan. I think even in the map, US is larger. hehehe...
TSam_eniey
post Dec 16 2007, 05:46 PM

✿✿✿✿✿
*******
Senior Member
3,314 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Taman Sri Melati, KL



QUOTE(izaman @ Jan 21 2007, 02:44 PM)
US and EU have a very large market man. quite impossible they only concentrate only in Japan. I think even in the map, US is larger. hehehe...
*
but even in Japan, 360 overtakes ps3
michael9413
post Dec 16 2007, 07:11 PM

***@_@***
*******
Senior Member
6,986 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: E-Poh.../Pen-Nang.../Pee-Jay/S.Jaye



wah... pls don take this topic out again... sweat.gif
it has been laid in the bottom of the forum since 11 months ago...
Hitman190
post Dec 16 2007, 07:42 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
589 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: KrustyLia...Long Live Krusty...


QUOTE(am_eniey @ Dec 16 2007, 05:46 PM)
but even in Japan, 360 overtakes ps3
*
eh where got...the 360 still trails behind all the other consoles in Japan...but then again the 360 dont have cutesy cutesy Japanese RPGs.... tongue.gif
kurtkob78
post Dec 16 2007, 11:32 PM

Do your best
*******
Senior Member
3,833 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Shah Alam


better looking graphic yes, but it also got the RROD problem. They got so much money yet they dont repair this rclxub.gif
MmxZero
post Dec 17 2007, 01:54 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
QUOTE(am_eniey @ Jan 16 2007, 04:45 AM)
After his keynote at the International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas earlier this week, Bill Gates was chatting to a small group of reporters about the 360 and according to a blogger from Mercury News, Gates talked about how Microsoft and Sony have switched positions.

He said that this time, Microsoft has the high ground. It has "a small box, costs less, is visually compelling, has great games, does online superbly and offers all of the tools for game developers to make games easily," Gates said referring to the 360.

He also said that Sony doesn't have any advantage in graphics saying that Sony "burned a year" trying to make the Cell processor do graphics functions. And when it didn't work, they went to Nvidia for the graphics chip at the last minute. Gates said the 360 game developers would always be a year ahead of Sony on the learning curve in taking advantage of the system and as a result, PS3 will never have games that look better than Xbox 360's.

Currently it's true, Gears of War is the best looking game on any system. There's just no denying it. But I guess only time will tell if Sony will prove Mr. Gates wrong. I for one hope they will, as I imagine Microsoft will then retaliate and it's us, the gamers, that end up playing the sickest looking games ever created.
*
Gates is talking crap.

He wanted to beat Sony all along, so he went and push the 360 and had 1 year head start.

He did not care whether the system was working 100% fine. And look what happened. 3rod.

And from the warranty claim, ms should be making quite a lot of loss. Warranty claim for MS is a cost.

By banning people off live also they get more sale because some people who are 360 fan will really buy it. Actually they can just ban anytime when they need more revenue.

And in marketplace, they even make more by people buying points.

My point is MS cares only how much revenue they can generate before launching a newer console.

Sony, yes they are in big trouble, thats why they are trying to reduce the price. And MS is talking crap. We all know PS3 nvidia performs way better then 360 Ati.

The only problem is, there is no good game and not good online like 360 but guess is free rclxms.gif

But Sony was smart in way of making sure the product is in top quality. How many PS3 is not proper working properly compare to 360 ?

Sony just need a good game with high end graphics. But still Sony is 1 good entertainment system.

This post has been edited by MmxZero: Dec 17 2007, 01:55 AM
DjiNn
post Dec 17 2007, 01:55 AM

~||Noob Game Console Advisor||~
*******
Store Representative
7,931 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ, Malaysia



QUOTE(kurtkob78 @ Dec 16 2007, 11:32 PM)
better looking graphic yes, but it also got the RROD problem. They got so much money yet they dont repair this  rclxub.gif
*
all these leave to MS and others to mess with.

we play games enough already.

politics stuff let thier MS boys do the job la. tongue.gif
INFeRNO
post Dec 17 2007, 08:02 AM

Lord and Master
******
Senior Member
1,754 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Balham, London



QUOTE(MmxZero @ Dec 16 2007, 05:54 PM)
Gates is talking crap.
He wanted to beat Sony all along, so he went and push the 360 and had 1 year head start.
He did not care whether the system was working 100% fine. And look what happened. 3rod.
And from the warranty claim, ms should be making quite a lot of loss. Warranty claim for MS is a cost.
By banning people off live also they get more sale because some people who are 360 fan will really buy it. Actually they can just ban anytime when they need more revenue.
And in marketplace, they even make more by people buying points.
My point is MS cares only how much revenue they can generate before launching a newer console.
Sony, yes they are in big trouble, thats why they are trying to reduce the price. And MS is talking crap. We all know PS3 nvidia performs way better then 360 Ati.
The only problem is, there is no good game and not good online like 360 but guess is free  rclxms.gif
But Sony was smart in way of making sure the product is in top quality. How many PS3 is not proper working properly compare to 360 ?
Sony just need a good game with high end graphics. But still Sony is 1 good entertainment system.
*
Spoken like a true fanboi...

Sony's system is shit. It's too damn expensive, the controllers don't vibrate, the games suck balls...

You're right about 1 thing though, graphics don't mean squat. That's what M$ learnt with the original xbox vs. PS2. Oh wait, you said the opposite.

Banning people for more revenue? Comedy gold.

The red ring of death thing is kind of a bummer though. But it must say something about a console when people are buying it knowing that this is an issue.

Am I a fanboy? Hell yeah. Nintendo Wii all the way baby! But since I couldn't find a store which had them in stock, I got a xbox 360 instead. And I enjoy taking flamebait. *yumm*
TSam_eniey
post Dec 17 2007, 09:26 AM

✿✿✿✿✿
*******
Senior Member
3,314 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Taman Sri Melati, KL



Do not buy NFS: ProStreet. It's shit.<-----this is true mate, i've tried it and i am a bit down with the graphics and gameplay. this is what happens when a company is rich enough......
michael9413
post Dec 17 2007, 10:42 AM

***@_@***
*******
Senior Member
6,986 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: E-Poh.../Pen-Nang.../Pee-Jay/S.Jaye



please la... don flame about this again... Xbox, PS or Nintendo
all have pros and cons...
Breaktru
post Dec 17 2007, 12:07 PM

== The World ==
******
Senior Member
1,769 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(am_eniey @ Dec 16 2007, 05:46 PM)
but even in Japan, 360 overtakes ps3
*
Isn't true , according to NPD sales , PS3 sales still far ahead of 360 , at least in Japan .

QUOTE(Hitman190 @ Dec 16 2007, 07:42 PM)
eh where got...the 360 still trails behind all the other consoles in Japan...but then again the 360 dont have cutesy cutesy Japanese RPGs.... tongue.gif
*
360 does have the cutesy Jrpg , like Blue Dragon and Eternal Sonata . PS3 on the other hand still lack of it . The closest is folklore , but it isn't cute lol . smile.gif
redbull_y2k
post Dec 17 2007, 12:09 PM

"Viva La Revolucion!"
******
Senior Member
1,469 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: YOU.ESS.JAY



QUOTE(INFeRNO @ Dec 17 2007, 08:02 AM)
Spoken like a true fanboi...

Sony's system is shit. It's too damn expensive, the controllers don't vibrate, the games suck balls...

You're right about 1 thing though, graphics don't mean squat. That's what M$ learnt with the original xbox vs. PS2. Oh wait, you said the opposite.

Banning people for more revenue? Comedy gold.

The red ring of death thing is kind of a bummer though. But it must say something about a console when people are buying it knowing that this is an issue.

Am I a fanboy? Hell yeah. Nintendo Wii all the way baby! But since I couldn't find a store which had them in stock, I got a xbox 360 instead. And I enjoy taking flamebait. *yumm*
*
Eh but funnily enuff, at least locally, the 40Gb PS3 is the cheapest next-gen console and yet had better spec compared to xbox360. But yeah, it is seriously lacking in games, the only game i'm looking fwd to rite now is just Uncharted : Drake's Fortune. tongue.gif Oh yeah vibration is back too, but the controller's sold separately. sweat.gif
samurai20
post Dec 17 2007, 12:49 PM

~~HMMMM~~
******
Senior Member
1,441 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
dont care la who win... i like to play good game.. the console... GTH.... so play all.. better.. wat.. biggrin.gif
devilfedora81
post Dec 17 2007, 01:20 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
QUOTE(samurai20 @ Dec 17 2007, 12:49 PM)
dont care la who win... i like to play good game.. the console... GTH.... so play all.. better.. wat.. biggrin.gif
*
Ko mmg semua nak bedal tongue.gif
Taman Linkin
post Dec 17 2007, 03:21 PM

Bijes
******
Senior Member
1,657 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klawang stage 1


PC will always have better looking games.
3AAA
post Dec 17 2007, 03:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Speaking of japanese RPG, I think there will be more (that I would buy) coming out soon on xbox360 compare to ps3.
for example, Lost Odyssey (by creater of final fantasy), The Last Remnant (Square Enix), Infinite Undiscovery (Square Enix)

got xbox360 for over a year now, but thinking of buying a ps3 soon due to xbox360 3rod problem. still deciding what game to buy.

This post has been edited by 3AAA: Dec 17 2007, 04:00 PM
zaakath
post Dec 17 2007, 05:41 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
654 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
Ultimately its about the taste of games. Xbox realised that they type of games they have been producing is just not hitting with the Japanese public. So they brought developers to make such games as Blue Dragon.

The PS3 has alot of potential to be a better console but developers of games are still trying to find the best out of using the PS3 technology. If you look at some of the games on PS3 they are essentially a port out of Xbox. However if you look at games like Heavenly Sword, Liar and Motorstorm the graphics shows the true potential of the PS3

So the statement Xbox 360 has better looking games is purely an opinion of the TS. I am not fanboi in any console but right now I am finding my 360 more appealing than my PS3. My son who hated the xbox and loves the PS2 is now exactly the opposite. I ask him why? Its the Xbox Live. You ain't experince the Xbox till you go live and the lack of games. Also why buy a PS3 original game when you can get the same game for much less with the same graphics or worse framerate issues.

PS3 has the potential for Live and are just learning about the Live experince. But ask yourself why was there never headset bundle in the first place like the 360? It was an afterthought and when Warhawk came out in a box format they threw in the BT cause you need a headset to communicate.
msn83235502
post Dec 17 2007, 06:04 PM

ผู้นิยม
*******
Senior Member
2,862 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: アメリカ



argghhh.... there's still no F1 game in x360 ! hopefully next year EA F1's will have for x360..
but lucky,those motogp series are on x360. laugh.gif

This post has been edited by msn83235502: Dec 17 2007, 06:04 PM
TSam_eniey
post Dec 21 2007, 02:18 PM

✿✿✿✿✿
*******
Senior Member
3,314 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Taman Sri Melati, KL



QUOTE(Taman Linkin @ Dec 17 2007, 03:21 PM)
PC will always have better looking games.
*
oh yes but u have to spend your entire savings to earn a console's graphics
ZhaoYun
post Dec 21 2007, 03:31 PM

A Mac Convert
******
Senior Member
1,029 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Petaling Jaya


I agree that xbox360 has a better graphic CURRENTLY ! But Always ?? No, I cannot agree on that. You will not know what will happen in the future, as of now, developer has problem understanding the Cell Processor. But once they master it, who dare to say PS3 will not have the edge ? And last but not least, graphics is not all about a gaming console, look at Wii.
MmxZero
post Dec 21 2007, 06:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
QUOTE(INFeRNO @ Dec 17 2007, 08:02 AM)
Spoken like a true fanboi...

Sony's system is shit. It's too damn expensive, the controllers don't vibrate, the games suck balls...

You're right about 1 thing though, graphics don't mean squat. That's what M$ learnt with the original xbox vs. PS2. Oh wait, you said the opposite.

Banning people for more revenue? Comedy gold.

The red ring of death thing is kind of a bummer though. But it must say something about a console when people are buying it knowing that this is an issue.

Am I a fanboy? Hell yeah. Nintendo Wii all the way baby! But since I couldn't find a store which had them in stock, I got a xbox 360 instead. And I enjoy taking flamebait. *yumm*
*
Fan boy? LOL.

All I'm saying is PS3 is the best entertainment system you will ever get for a good price.

Don't you see. MS only care about how much they earn. Their Xbox live, games, market place. Most of them you must pay to obtain exclude the game

While PS3 is free except for the games.

PS3 just need a good game. Once many good game for PS3, then PS3 will win Xbox 360.

And your a Nintendo fan boy. I have no comment about Nintendo because the console is a next gen of way to play games.

If you still want who wins, I say Pc. Spent less 10k on it you will get a superior system compare to those.
ventriloquist
post Dec 21 2007, 06:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
QUOTE(MmxZero @ Dec 21 2007, 06:05 PM)
Fan boy? LOL.

All I'm saying is PS3 is the best entertainment system you will ever get for a good price.

Don't you see. MS only care about how much they earn. Their Xbox live, games, market place. Most of them you must pay to obtain exclude the game

While PS3 is free except for the games.

PS3 just need a good game. Once many good game for PS3, then PS3 will win Xbox 360.

And your a Nintendo fan boy. I have no comment about Nintendo because the console is a next gen of way to play games.

If you still want who wins, I say Pc. Spent less 10k on it you will get a superior system compare to those.
*
i don't want to argue that if u favor x360 and u want to use x360 than just playing games, it's true that it gonna cost u...

considering the price(for now) between x360 and ps3 - which rm50 - rm70 different... i wouldn't mind paying for LIVE subscription which 12 month + 1... and theres a lot of games to buy...

which mean... if that games is multiplatform... im going for x360. I only go 4 ps3 as long it not playable on x360...

im just frustrated to hear that it sound like everyone can afford expensive machine not to mention more expensive games(but it the same games) because i know some of my friends bought a ps3 but played it on crt tv and when asked why don't buy a lcd tv? all money spend to ps3 and he need to save for future games and sometimes starving sweat.gif ...

talked about MS only care about how much they earn... SONY is well known to sell the most expensive gadget but actually compare to other brand which cost cheaper, it just like adidas shirt or pant is expensive because "3 stripes" on it...

thanks God x360 is exist... if not how much u gonna spend to buy brand new ps3?

P.S. this post is not directly for MmxZero... it's general. Sorry if i offense someone.
haris
post Dec 21 2007, 07:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(ZhaoYun @ Dec 21 2007, 03:31 PM)
I agree that xbox360 has a better graphic CURRENTLY ! But Always ?? No, I cannot agree on that. You will not know what will happen in the future, as of now, developer has problem understanding the Cell Processor. But once they master it, who dare to say PS3 will not have the edge ? And last but not least, graphics is not all about a gaming console, look at Wii.
*
Believe me, cell will not make game prettier. Aabsolutely not in this generation. It does have potential for more parallel processing stuff, like more realistic AI, physic, sounds, etc.

The beauty of 360 is that it is a balance machine with accessible power/performance. This doesn't means that it cannot be squeezed for more performance.

Lets wait another 1 or 2 years, I believe that even then, the difference between 360 & PS3 in whatever areas will not be noticeable.

Cheers!
icon_rolleyes.gif


Afterthought:
Microsoft has great platform (Life, Xbox 360 Operating System), Sony has great hardware (Cell & hardware stability that rocks) and WII has great IPs (controller, creative games). Imagine a world where all of them work together and the console is PSWII360. smile.gif But that will never happen!

Another afterthought:
Microsoft has not always wanted to be in the console business. Originally they just want to provide the platform. Sega Dreamcast is using Windows CE as the OS. Microsoft once approach Nintendo to use windows as console operating system. But got rejected. Imagine if that goes through rclxub.gif .
INFeRNO
post Dec 22 2007, 12:26 AM

Lord and Master
******
Senior Member
1,754 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Balham, London



QUOTE(MmxZero @ Dec 21 2007, 10:05 AM)
Fan boy? LOL.

All I'm saying is PS3 is the best entertainment system you will ever get for a good price.

Don't you see. MS only care about how much they earn. Their Xbox live, games, market place. Most of them you must pay to obtain exclude the game

While PS3 is free except for the games.

PS3 just need a good game. Once many good game for PS3, then PS3 will win Xbox 360.

And your a Nintendo fan boy. I have no comment about Nintendo because the console is a next gen of way to play games.

If you still want who wins, I say Pc. Spent less 10k on it you will get a superior system compare to those.
*
Dude, you're no fun. I'm trying to have an argument with you, and you're coming across all polite and shit... boo tongue.gif

Anyways, consoles live and die by their game library. People like M$ and Sony spend big bucks wooing publishers to develop games for their console, even better if the title is an exclusive. With the PS2, it was so far ahead of everyone else at the time, it wasn't even a fair fight. The PS2 may just be the best console of all time. People still publish games for the PS2, how great is that?

To me, the PS3 is expensive. PS3 games cost £10 more than 360 games. The console itself is £60 more. If you read any game-centric website, you will also know that developers find it a bit harder to create games for the PS3. Something to do with the dev platform. Also, how many good exclusives does the PS3 have? Heavenly Sword? Drake's Fortune? Not exactly must plays... A new final fantasy would be nice, but then again how many people still enjoy playing the FF series?

Getting out of subject here. Sorry for rambling. PS3 may be better hardware wise, but the games aren't there yet, and may never will. So right now, the 360 is a better bet.
TSam_eniey
post Dec 22 2007, 08:07 PM

✿✿✿✿✿
*******
Senior Member
3,314 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Taman Sri Melati, KL



QUOTE(INFeRNO @ Dec 22 2007, 12:26 AM)
Dude, you're no fun. I'm trying to have an argument with you, and you're coming across all polite and shit... boo tongue.gif

Anyways, consoles live and die by their game library. People like M$ and Sony spend big bucks wooing publishers to develop games for their console, even better if the title is an exclusive. With the PS2, it was so far ahead of everyone else at the time, it wasn't even a fair fight. The PS2 may just be the best console of all time. People still publish games for the PS2, how great is that?

To me, the PS3 is expensive. PS3 games cost £10 more than 360 games. The console itself is £60 more. If you read any game-centric website, you will also know that developers find it a bit harder to create games for the PS3. Something to do with the dev platform. Also, how many good exclusives does the PS3 have? Heavenly Sword? Drake's Fortune? Not exactly must plays... A new final fantasy would be nice, but then again how many people still enjoy playing the FF series?

Getting out of subject here. Sorry for rambling. PS3 may be better hardware wise, but the games aren't there yet, and may never will. So right now, the 360 is a better bet.
*
yeah, you're right. PS3 is too state of the art where ppl nowadays buy it to play lots of games not buying it for just enjoying with only a few games......xbox360 is the best bet for everyone
Microsuck_360
post Dec 22 2007, 08:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(ventriloquist @ Dec 21 2007, 06:37 PM)
i don't want to argue that if u favor x360 and u want to use x360 than just playing games, it's true that it gonna cost u...

considering the price(for now) between x360 and ps3 - which rm50 - rm70 different... i wouldn't mind paying for LIVE subscription which 12 month + 1... and theres a lot of games to buy...

which mean... if that games is multiplatform... im going for x360. I only go 4 ps3 as long it not playable on x360...

im just frustrated to hear that it sound like everyone can afford expensive machine not to mention more expensive games(but it the same games) because i know some of my friends bought a ps3 but played it on crt tv and when asked why don't buy a lcd tv? all money spend to ps3 and he need to save for future games and sometimes starving sweat.gif ...

talked about MS only care about how much they earn... SONY is well known to sell the most expensive gadget but actually compare to other brand which cost cheaper, it just like adidas shirt or pant is expensive because "3 stripes" on it...

thanks God x360 is exist... if not how much u gonna spend to buy brand new ps3?

P.S. this post is not directly for MmxZero... it's general. Sorry if i offense someone.
*
ko punya machine dah okay ke? blush.gif
prazole
post Dec 22 2007, 08:22 PM

Sleepyhead..
******
Senior Member
1,513 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Kuching - Klang



QUOTE(INFeRNO @ Dec 22 2007, 12:26 AM)
Dude, you're no fun. I'm trying to have an argument with you, and you're coming across all polite and shit... boo tongue.gif

Anyways, consoles live and die by their game library. People like M$ and Sony spend big bucks wooing publishers to develop games for their console, even better if the title is an exclusive. With the PS2, it was so far ahead of everyone else at the time, it wasn't even a fair fight. The PS2 may just be the best console of all time. People still publish games for the PS2, how great is that?

To me, the PS3 is expensive. PS3 games cost £10 more than 360 games. The console itself is £60 more. If you read any game-centric website, you will also know that developers find it a bit harder to create games for the PS3. Something to do with the dev platform. Also, how many good exclusives does the PS3 have? Heavenly Sword? Drake's Fortune? Not exactly must plays... A new final fantasy would be nice, but then again how many people still enjoy playing the FF series?

Getting out of subject here. Sorry for rambling. PS3 may be better hardware wise, but the games aren't there yet, and may never will. So right now, the 360 is a better bet.
*
u are quite right about 360's game library over ps3..
but 360 isnt without its own flaw..
the 3ROD which has yet to be solved.. remains a big headache..
of coz this might not be so much of a problem if ur in USA or SG
but looking at the fact that we are in malaysia.. its really a huge put off..


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0361sec    0.14    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 01:52 PM