Just don't forget , with the humongous cas reserves, Microsoft can always play the unfair advantage by taking over any game developer companies.....especially the one that has close association with its competitors...and I am predicting at least 3/4 dgame developer companies will be under the roof of Microsoft Game Studio this year...

Am I the only one who thinks that it would be better for a console monopoly?

I mean, I'm not fortunate enough to be able to own ALL consoles, and quite often I've thought "wow I'd SO love to have that game but I don't have the console for it."

IMO console monopoly is good. The quality of the games would arguably be the same because there's still competition between the studios, but the difference to us would be all the best games would be playable on the same console

have to wait forwhile for ps3 to warm up..hehe..den u'll see da dazzling gfx. its like a 200m race. 1st 100m x360 leadin but later on wen ps3 active..win da race..hehe.. i hope neva kena blasah coz supportin ps3 in 360 section=P hehe.. jus my 0.02sen.

by the way, sony real market strategy is not america or europe. they focus on Japan. if the japan market successful they will consider that the ps3 is a success. else MS concentrate on world wide market. ofcourse they will move a bit faster than the sony la.