Hi Everyone...My current tyre already botak..
Plan to change my tyre..
Due to the price of Viking PT5 is quite reasonable so i think to give it a try..
So anyone here already used this tyre can share some feedbacks of yours?

This post has been edited by Isaac599: Jun 7 2016, 11:49 AM

I m using CT5 for my saga sv, fair amount thread and thick(won't so fast botak), except for abit of noise due to its price haha... But quality wise I would say good for such a price. Been using for months

Ya..the thread is really thick enough to last for a long time..haha..
But dunno what is the diffrence between CT5 and PT5...

U driving what car? I think its the thread design...

u may refer to the links below for further reviews...

[URL=http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/3064023/all]
carsifu
rebiu

I'm driving Civic 8th gen..
I see..

Ok..Thanks a lot Bro..

noisy tyres

u r most welcome bro

Yes, you are nit the only one who said noisy....it like bearing sound..

In terms of dry and wet grip or braking, how does it perform compared to other brands?

This post has been edited by putra23: Jul 1 2016, 11:34 PM

i tried, generally it does not differ much from the other tyres at the same or slightly higher range. But the difference I could tell is the thread it had on the tyre, so thick!

Thanks for sharing. Yes, the grooves are very thick. Should be good in dispersing water during rain.

That day went on to change my saga pair of rear tire, bridgrstone cause the shop don have Viking, Viking is more hard for its side, bridgrstone softer... price wise 140each for bridge...

Bridgestone RE003? Between the 2 brands, which is your preference?

Actually the difference is that soft tyre gives u a more comfy drive... other than that not much diff.

Viking PT5 vs Dunlop J5

which is bestest SiFU?

this interesting tyre actually caught my eyes.

cheap and pretty good.
good at wet and dry, hearsay.
I didn't try it hence don't use my words as a guide.

for a size of 17', it cost less than rm250..

most tyres that are noisy, are good at grip.
like RE003?

thick, because of high treadwear. make your money last.

Both comparable for me. There are some feedbacks on the noise from Viking. Nearing 10k km, so far still ok.
Viking being new to the market, I think most people would prefer Dunlop due to brand familiarity.

Tq

But cudnt get best price these few days asking around

Gonna head to kedai papan klang n settle it for goodyear

how much is best price do u seek?hahaa..if u can get around rm 160-170 is reasonable already.

I want 150 hahaha

But actually citicar told me they can give me rm148 until they say they wrongly quoted me. The price is RM170

damn! i almost confirm buy adi

today went and have a look.. 195/55/15 rm150 siap balancing alligent , labour + gst

Any updated feedback on this type?
I would like to know more.

installed 4 PT5's on my Preve. they're slightly noisier than the previous Yokohama BluEarth but you can't argue with the price!

and with that 360 treadwear they should last a while.

may i know now after a few months of usage, how do you rate the noise level?

after 3 months they're still kinda the same but i've gotten used to it already.

viking under continental?

http://www.motorsportchannel.com/viking-pr...gly-good-value/

viking is a nail attracted . so far i kena nail and tampal 6 times already around all my 4 tyres.( 1 year usage) the tread still very thick after 1 year

maybe luck not by your side.my friend use pt5 so far so good la.no kena nail yet.

once one of my tyres had a defect at the sidewall and it kept on deflating. due to the 3rd party repair (temporary tampal), my warranty claim was rejected by Continental. aiyoh a bit unlucky that time...

heard that if tyre have been patch before might void the warranty.

yes it voids the warranty

then rugi la..have to change new one

Hi all, I got these viking PT5 since feb 2018. Have been using them now for about 16000km.
I do agree it's noisy, sounds like bearing sound on rough road, when braking, it sounds like the tyre really gripping the ground.

When I 1st gotten the tyres, I kept the pressure(cold) at front(~37psi), back(~35psi). The road contact seems ok when I go over e.g. dusty areas, wet areas, I do see front and back tyres have full/good contact with the sand/water marks on the tyres.

I observed something about the tyres after my 1st 10k km rotation. It seems like the back tyres aren't really contacting the road fully at the shoulder areas about 1-2cm from side wall.
Previously, when tyres were new, at 35psi(cold), its was alright. Now, it seems like it is over-inflated. I tried reducing to 33psi(cold), it looks slightly better but not 100%.

Any other users have similar experience to mine?

Just bought Viking tyres so far okay.. a bit noisy...but you get used to it...