Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Differences between Satria Neo Models

views
     
mystvearn
post Mar 18 2016, 12:35 PM

...
*******
Senior Member
6,639 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: "New Castle"



QUOTE(lsm1991 @ Mar 16 2016, 05:46 PM)
yep, only a few variants,
1)those limited edition 'real' r3 ones with the numbered plates
2)those clubsport editions with the cage
3)the lotus edition

i think thats all? keep in mind that those have eye popping pricetags!
*
You missed the Cusco JP variant tongue.gif
http://www.proton.co.jp/parts.html

Satria neo is a RM 200 mil/500 mil writeoff from proton. Too niche a car to be profitable.



QUOTE(goandloveyourself @ Mar 16 2016, 05:47 PM)
the lotus racing edition is the best variant of the Neo's, maybe?
user posted image
*
The lotus is the most expensive, but rides high. You want the more sensible r3-2011 year model.

QUOTE(haroon86 @ Mar 17 2016, 06:14 PM)
Thanks.

Also as I was researching more, some people say that the auto gearbox is bad? ohmy.gif
I finally liked a good H-Line piece, and I have been looking for auto 1.6 all this while and this particular one suited all my requirements, and it looked EXCELLENT! But its auto, which I really wanted.

But is it that bad? Like compared to what? I have driven isawara auto, waja, myvi, mutsibushi all auto, etc. Or is it really bad compared to like sporty higher spec cars? *worried*
*
People are complaining of the torque dip actually, which is quite bad.

If you want a hatchback, get the Suprima. Has rear doors. laugh.gif The neo's long doors+small parking place at shopping mall = trapped inside laugh.gif


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0181sec    0.55    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 02:18 AM